Jump to content

Talk:Cal Horton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconWiki Loves Pride
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2024.

Cal Horton's comments were not considered substantive enough for the Cass Review page

[edit]
WP:NOTFORUM
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Cal Horton's comments were not considered substantive enough for the Cass Review page

The page did once include some of their statements and claims - but as the [Review Talk] page records. it was not considered due enough. So the Cass Review page for months has nothing about Horton.

Cass Talk has for example about Horton: that they are:

   <a quote from Cass talk, that I used last time >

whereas on the Puberty Blocker page, a whole sizeable paragraph is given to Hortons views, which to my reading, are exactly contradictory to statements on the Cass page about the very same things.

There is now more indepth discussion on the Puberty Blocker talk, about the need to address the fact that it and Cass page are stating 100% contradictory things.

I guess I'm asking, on the chance that on reviewing the Puberty Blocker page the Horton content is removed from it: would that mean that this Horton page itself is no longer due on wiki? Or not?

PS Raladic - I've worked hard to rephrase this comment, so I hope it is now acceptable to you, so won't be 100% deleted again. Many thanks. Peckedagain Peckedagain (talk) 02:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is and isn't due for any particular page is handled on a case by case basis and what one pages consensus is, has no bearing on another as each article has different scopes. Also note that editors are not infallible and may make mistakes, so one decision from the past of a local consensus on one article does not mean that it is immutable and consensus can change and evolve as more details become clear.
Please note that Wikipedia is not a forum and this comment here doesn't actually appear to have any content on improving this article here in particular, so this discussion is not relevant on this article talk page here.
This article talk page here is to improve the content of the Biography of an expert on transgender research, so any discussions here are limited to improvement of this article here, not unrelated other questions. Raladic (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]