Talk:Hurricane Eugene (1987)

Hurricane Eugene (1987) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Eugene (1987) is part of the 1987 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 16, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
July 20, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
November 15, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Eugene (1987)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk • contribs • count) 16:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Eugene weakened back to a Category 1 hurricane, Eugene made landfall near Manzanillo, Colima. Eugene" - can you cut down on the number of times you say Eugene? :P Ditto with the MH, it uses it a lot.
- A changed a few. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"The amount of rainfall dropped by Eugene caused it to be the wettest tropical cyclone in five Mexican states." - that's a little wonky. I recommend switching it to something like... "The hurricane deluged the southwest Mexican coastline, resulting in the highest rainfall totals from a tropical cyclone in five states."
- Added your suggest to the page.
"Over 5,000 people were left homeless and heavy crop damage occurred" - it seems weird to compare how people were affected to how the land was affected.
- Split into two sentences.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"Over the next two days it moved across Central America and was next noted by meteorologists off the coast of Nicaragua on July 20" - that doesn't make sense, the "next noted"
- Reworded. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"746 mi (1,201 km)" - why so exact?
- Why not? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"Eugene continued intensifying as it tracked at a steady pace to north-northwestward" - that doesn't flow too well ("to north-northwestward" mainly).
- Changed to "to towards the". Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
" Forecasters anticipated to storm to reach minimal hurricane intensity that day, but the tropical storm was initially predicted to remain offshore." - why do you feel the need to mention that hurricane intensity was forecast? That seems redundant considering the next sentence establishes that it did. I guess I'm just not sure why you use the "but" in there, since there's nothing contradictory.
- Reworded. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"When the storm first posed a threat to Mexico on July 24, the port of Zinuhuatenjo was closed for small craft. Navigation classes were suspended in Acapulco. The port of Manzanillo was closed. Many other ports were closed as well." - could you combine a few of these? That's four very short sentences in a row.
Combined the second and third and wikilinked Acapulco (most people do not know where it is exactly). YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- I was actually thinking combining that Manzanillo, as well as others, were closed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the preps/impact section, can you find a way to avoid starting two consecutive paragraphs with "Hurricane Eugene"?
- Switched the second to "the system".Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"According to a front desk person at one hotel, it was forced to use emergency generators during the passage of the hurricane" - why is that encyclopediac? Not just the first part, but any of it. Lots of people use generators during hurricanes.
- Removed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Three people, one of those being a six year-old girl" - that happens right after you mention the man's death due to a tree falling. It creates some confusion whether the man is included there. I'd recommend something like "There were two other deaths, including a six year-old girl".
- Used your recommendation. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The damage amounted to more than $2.6 million in damage (1987 USD)" - department of redundancy department?
- Removed the second use. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you say Eugene was the first since 1954, considering the Calvin source says since 1949?
- Switched to 1949. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - But I see why you did 1954, since there was technically a July hurricane that hit Mexico in 1954. Try finding a way to reflect the sources. Plus, it's weird how you say "the 1949". ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I found nothing in a goggle search and removed the record, though I still mention that Eugene is the second most recent landfalling July cane.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane

Otherwise it's good. These are pretty minor and I'll be happy to pass once finished. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Eugene (1987). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304030354/http://www.conagua.gob.mx/OCLSP07/Contenido/Documentos/ProgHidricodeJalisco2030.pdf to http://www.conagua.gob.mx/OCLSP07/Contenido/Documentos/ProgHidricodeJalisco2030.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]