A fact from Natalie Simanowski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was created or improved during the Olympics & Paralympics edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project from July to September 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced and has no copyvio. The hook is cited and interesting, but I'm not sure if describing her attacker as a "psychopath" is politically correct enough for Wikipedia. I can see that it's the term used in the original source, but since I'm not knowledgable about German I can't tell if that's a diagnosis or a turn of speech (ie "He's such a psychopath"). Not a problem that would prevent this nom from passing, I just want another opinion. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had that problem too, I though about "by a stranger" or "random attack", but its not made clear whether he was known to her and I wanted to avoid being so politically correct that we failed to report the facts. Leaving "by a psychopath" out of the hook side steps the issue and we can put "described as" in the article. I'm not sure we will find an authoritative opinion here. Victuallers (talk) 12:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
True, I'm not sure how to verify whether the "psychopath" bit is factually accurate or journalistic color (I also don't know much about German news media, whether its more likely to be accurate or not). From what I know, the popular use of the term psychopath is inaccurate but without understanding nuance I don't know if that's the case here. I think I'll err on the side of trusting the sources to be strictly factual and approve ALT0 and ALT1@Victuallers:. BuySomeApples (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced and has no copyvio. The hook is cited and interesting, but I'm not sure if describing her attacker as a "psychopath" is politically correct enough for Wikipedia. I can see that it's the term used in the original source, but since I'm not knowledgable about German I can't tell if that's a diagnosis or a turn of speech (ie "He's such a psychopath"). Not a problem that would prevent this nom from passing, I just want another opinion. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)