Talk:Varig Flight 967

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Number of paintings lost[edit]

The article states that 53 paintings were lost. But https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manabu_Mabe says that 153 paintings were on board. Which number is correct? Renerpho (talk) 04:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly a typo on one or the other Bucky winter soldier (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Largest disappearance[edit]

Doesn’t MH370 count now? Iamthinking2202 (talk) 12:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It didnt then! tweaked sentence, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 14:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We must change this because parts of MH370 were found. I would suggest simply reverting MilborneOne's edit. - Samf4u (talk) 14:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but they haven't found anyone from Malaysian 370 yet. So I might still count that as the larger disappearance Bucky winter soldier (talk) 00:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]