Template:Did you know nominations/Conchoderma virgatum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Conchoderma virgatum[edit]
- ... that the goose barnacle Conchoderma virgatum
seldomrarely attaches directly to a fish, but four individuals were once found attached to a single spine of a porcupinefish? Source: "These barnacles seldom attach directly to fish" and "4 specimens were originally seen attached, all to the same spine"- ALT1:... that the goose barnacle Conchoderma virgatum has been observed attached to an isopod that was parasitic on an orange filefish?
- Reviewed: Ian Aird
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC).
Copyvio 1%, QPQ done. hook in article. Cited. New article, well sourced and cited. Clearly written. Whispyhistory (talk) 07:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
