Template:Did you know nominations/Textile industry in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Textile industry in China[edit]

  • ...that China is the world's largest textile exporter with an export value in 2013 nearly seven times greater than the next largest exporting country?
  • ALT1 ...that China is the world's leading textile exporter, shipping nearly seven times as much as the next country in 2013?

Created by Muzzleflash (talk). Self-nominated at 07:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article is new and was created on 00:20, 03 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2315 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (12.3% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 137 characters
    • Muzzleflash has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 5 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 15:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment Shorter ALT1 added. Edwardx (talk) 19:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • The article is new enough, long enough and within policy regarding neutrality, citations and avoidance of close paraphrasing issues. The hooks are both within length, interesting and neutral. No QPQ is required. Alansohn (talk) 03:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)