User:FisherQueen/Archive29
| FisherQueen
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Speedy deletion of :User:FisherQueen/Secret[edit] If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Edit war[edit]IP adress 74.248.71.213 is currently edit warring on quite a few articles, breaks the 3 revert rule, has been warned twice about this, but blanked his userpage and continues. Warrington (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Apology Please[edit]I would like an apology for slamming me with a sockpuppet name that I have no clue who he/she is nor have I heard of.Cena Jr (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Replay Photos page[edit]Hi FisherQueen, On Feb. 20, you deleted a page I was creating on a company from Durham, NC called Replay Photos. At first, I didn't understand what had happened to the article, so I tried to recreate it without providing the appropriate documentation to back it up. I've assembled several articles that prove the notability of this company (especially among well established individuals like Coach K at Duke University). Please take a look at them and let me know if you'll be able to undelete the article so I can keep adding to it. Thanks! http://www.news.wisc.edu/15767 http://ecupirates.cstv.com/genrel/090607aaa.html http://www.hokiesports.com/cc/recaps/1152004aaa.html http://www.coachk.com/coachk-photos.php http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-151895535.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-152645647.html http://www.goduke.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=4200&ATCLID=3642874 http://www.killerstartups.com/Site-Reviews/replayphotos-com-athletic-college-photos http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/11/prweb481961.htm http://www.news.wisc.edu/11946 http://www.thezoi.com/node/10355 Corleonebastich (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Wonderful editing![edit]I have seen some of your pages and they are very organized. Keep up the good work! (Iloveapplemacintosh (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC))This message was mistakenly put on your user page so I copied it here. LovesMacs (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC) After all.[edit]I bet you type without using your little finger, right?[edit]
Bout time you had one of these[edit]
Love note[edit]Fuck you bitch I will find your IP adress n kill you with my gun bitch ass motherfucker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.2.190 (talk • contribs)
Botched block review of Histopher Critchens and Wikipedius Reparo[edit]Histopher Critchens (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Sockpuppets[edit]User try to bias article, removing relevant and sourced facts, most probably also using sock puppet. No respect for guidlines. This user is editing the Komondor dog article under one name, User:Meoconne [1] Probably also edits the article Komondor as User:Lynovella and IP adress 70.121.204.57. Provides third oppinion on Komondor issues and edit war, on talk page under name, User:Lynovella which he or she presents as Thid Person Arbritation, misspelled. (Lynovella also claiming that average height has never been removed). Combined IP adress :70.121.204.57 and red link User:Meoconne repeatedly reverted edits at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed, non-NPOV edits. Remove edits from the Komondor article such as : No upper height limit is given.[1] and other relevant and sourced edits such as the dog breeds average height (most possible influenced by personal bias). Both average height (sourced) has been removed, (several times), [2] [3] [4], [5] [6] [7] upper limit height (sourced) [8], [9] mentioning other similar Hugarian sheepdogs [10], which all of them are extremely relevant information for this encyclopaedia article on this dog breed, and when we (and even ClueBot) [11] [12] [13] [14] put them back he keeps removing them [15], and produce a lot of unhelpful edits isntead [16], removing reference title [17], [18] without any consensus. This qualifies as Wikipedia:Edit war, disruptive editing, [19], [20]copright violation, from the FCI Komondor Standards [21], poorly formulated edits added in upper case, bias, non-NPOV edits Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and [22] most probably sockpuppetry by same editor, the above mentioned newly created new red link user accounts all editing the same articles, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show Komondor and Alpha Omega Epsilon. They are all concentrated on the same issue at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed, trying to adjust the article in a certain way. Namely that the breed is smaller than it acctually is and it is more like a certain dog the accounts and IP might be related to, or like, thoug they deny this. It is also possible that the account User:Goldie102 has been created to support this issue around this dog, see edit [23]. A dog which the accounts calls Ouincy, and which figures in a picture here (a smaller dog with a longer body), ignoring breed standard, and other sources and pictures presented in argumentation. This breed beeing fairly unknown, not many people check that article, or try to defend it from bias . I would like report them as sockpuppets but it looks like only administrators can do that. Warrington (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Warrington (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Question about a deleted page[edit]Hi FisherQueen, Let me first say that I'm not upset with you, I just want to know what I need to do to get a page I created back online. I am the web site administrator for the Stop TB Partnership and I had at one point created a wikipedia page for them but apparently it was deleted for copyright violation. Could you please let me know what I need to do to indicate that I am an authorized representative of the copyright holder so that the content will be allowed on wikipedia. Thank you very much! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobarr (talk • contribs) 15:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Question about a deleted page[edit]Hi FisherQueen, Let me first say that I'm not upset with you, I just want to know what I need to do to get a page I created back online. I am the web site administrator for the Stop TB Partnership and I had at one point created a wikipedia page for them but apparently it was deleted for copyright violation. Could you please let me know what I need to do to indicate that I am an authorized representative of the copyright holder so that the content will be allowed on wikipedia. Thank you very much! JoBarr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC).
Ahhhh, I see. Ok, Thanks for the explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.232.3.98 (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC) undeletion[edit]Hello my name is Duncan Edwards one of the pages that i have created has been deleted numerous times. it has been marked as vandalism and such of the sort. It is not. The article is on Coffeeism it is a starting religion. The religion started almost a year ago but I have just started making it public. The Coffeeist religion has a website at www.coffeeism.webs.com, I started putting the information about the religion on Wikipedia about a month ago but it keeps being deleted for no reason. i would like you or one of the other administrators to make my article safe from deletion. you have deleted my article and i would appreciate it if you would put the article back thank you, Coffeeism (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Duncan Edwards My question above[edit]I did not get any help anywhere. But I strongly suspect these are socks, can you check them, please? Warrington (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
And all of them are referring to a certain Komondor dog called Quincy, (which is said to be the one in that picture). All accounts try to adjust the Komondor dog article to make it sound like the breed is smaller and with a longer body, which means, to look more like the dog in that picture. A dog the accounts and IP might be related to (thoug they deny this), or like this dog, which the accounts all call Ouincy, a smaller Komondor dog with a longer body than the international standards calls for.
Combined IP adress :70.121.204.57 and red link User:Meoconne assisted by User:Lynovella, repeatedly reverted edits at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed articles, and removed facts from the Komondor article, such as: the dog breeds average height (30 inch), the fact that no upper height limit is given.[2] leaving only minimum height (and even other relevant and sourced breed caracteristics too). Both average height (sourced) has been removed, (several times), [24] [25] [26], [27] [28] [29] upper limit height (sourced) [30], [31] mentioning other similar Hugarian sheepdogs [32], which all of them are relevant information for this encyclopaedia article on this dog breed, and when I (and even ClueBot) [33] [34] [35] [36] put them back he keeps removing them again [37], and makes quite a few unhelpful edits instead [38], removing reference title, [39] without any consensus. This is both Wikipedia:Edit war, and disruptive editing [40], [41]. This edit was also copright violation, an exact copy from the FCI Komondor Standards [42], poorly formulated edit added upper case The above mentioned newly created new red link user accounts are all editing the same articles, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show Komondor and nothing else. They are all concentrated on the same issue at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed, trying to adjust the article to show that Quincy is a perfect dog according to the breeds standards.
They were trying to ignore breed standard, other sources and pictures presented in argumentation on the talk page . This breed being fairly unknown, not many people check that article, or try to defend it from bias . I am a bit lost, I thougt socks are not allowed on Wikipedia. Warrington (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009 — 16 March 2009
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Its MEEE!!![edit]whazzup?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBeardedWoman (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC) User:IzzyandBelle is a sockpuppet of a banned user. I revert this person's edits without hesitation. --Boston (talk) 01:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello... the vandal Big Geniuz seems to have a new name Polsit and to be about merrily vandalising more articles vaguely Polish - the latest one is attempting to change Witczak to Mitczak on the Lusitanian mythology page. Paul S (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] |
||||
