Jump to content

User talk:105.184.83.194

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About your nonconstructive edit warring on Cuck (film)[edit]

I am not any sort of admin, but I want to warn you to stop. The edits I reverted on this article were from a user edits went against the already agreed upon consensus. If you care to notice, said user also happens to now be indefinitely blocked from editing; for undisclosed paid editing no less, so yes, I was well within my right to revert their edits. If you have a problem with this take it to that article's talk page. I have no ability to do anything to your account, but I can warn you that others do, and you have already fair exceeded the minimum requirement to be blocked from editing. --2A02:C7F:3A2B:3B00:5012:AA3C:4BA4:EEEA (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GirthSummit (blether) 18:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Stop it[edit]

I appreciate that you were trying to get the other editor to engage on the talk page, but you were still edit warring. You should start a discussion on the talk page, and if the other party refuses to engage, go to dispute resolution. This is a very short block, which I will be happy to lift if you agree to stop reverting on that page (or any other admin may lift it without consulting me if such an commitment is made). GirthSummit (blether) 18:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

105.184.83.194 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Edit war started as other user was not following Wikipedia:Five Pillars, even source to disrupt is not WP:RS, he cant be opinionated as per Wikipedia:Five Pillars

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason you were blocked. Go and read this page carefully before making another request. GirthSummit (blether) 18:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.