User talk:216.81.94.71

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Stockholm syndrome worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cody Lundin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Γιάννης Α. ^✆|☑ 22:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! ^(Whisper...) 10:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mickey Ward, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WAYNESLAM 21:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richard Trumka, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- West.andrew.g (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Satan (Old Harry's Game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Satan (Old Harry's Game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan (Old Harry's Game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Imperial Valley College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kevin Jennings. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Rye whiskey. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ΚΛΤΛΝΛGØD^Τλłκ 12:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

John D. Rockerduck

Say since this is a shared IP I might be completely of base here and if I am I apologize in advanced, but after undoing my edit at Chick-fil-A you at first glance appear to be an old user User:216Home who was blocked indefinately, so I believe if you were that would be block evading, but again it's possible I'm wrong here John D. Rockerduck (talk) 17:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. Your recent edit to the page Findlay, Ohio appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Security & Protective Services, Inc..
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States Department of Homeland Security may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Reflist|colwidth=35em}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Thomson Park (Fiji), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Security & Protective Services, Inc. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Security & Protective Services, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello. Your recent edit to Downriver appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Velella. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Corozal, Puerto Rico seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris R. Notarile (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chris R. Notarile.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Civil Rights Act of 1964 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Future (rapper)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Isoroku Yamamoto. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 23:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Temecula, California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Someone at a government agency should not be vandalizing Wikipedia. Bahooka (talk) 22:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Julie Rowe— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm Quenhitran. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Toombs County High School  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 16:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mel Reynolds into List of federal political sex scandals in the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Same Chinese characters, two are not needed?

Do we really need to post the characters of the title in simplified and traditional, if they are exactly the same? (simplified Chinese: 北京遇上西雅图; traditional Chinese: 北京遇上西雅圖) 216.81.94.71 (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)unsigned

June 2017

Hello, I'm LM2000. Your recent edit to the page List of Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at M-80 (explosive). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dlthewave (talk) 21:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Dlthewave (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Languages of Guinea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Erica MacDonald seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe _talk 22:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Erica MacDonald. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —Non-Dropframe _talk 22:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Erica MacDonald, you may be blocked from editing. —Non-Dropframe _talk 22:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Trenton, Michigan appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

Hello, I'm Mstrojny. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Mstrojny (talk) 21:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Mili (1975 film)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ―Susmuffin ^Talk 21:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Semmendinger. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cutler, Maine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020 edits

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 03:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WDGQSE3RSC (talk • contribs) 03:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

July 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Killing of Dolal Idd. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please read Wikipedia's no original research guidelines. Thank you. Minnemeeples (talk) 03:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

---