User talk:ACMEMan

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Characters and sketches on Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 12:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection requests[edit]

If you want to request that a page be semi-protected, just drop a message in the Help desk. Socal gal at heart (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Characters and sketches on Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco⁵ 19:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Use your imagination, PBS Kids and You![edit]

I have nominated Use your imagination, PBS Kids and You!, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Use your imagination, PBS Kids and You!. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gladys J Cortez 03:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Watched By More Americans Than Any Other Network[edit]

I have nominated Watched By More Americans Than Any Other Network, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watched By More Americans Than Any Other Network. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gladys J Cortez 15:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding block notices[edit]

I see you added a block notice to an IP's talk page here. You need to be an administrator in order to issue blocks, and adding a block notice does not issue a block - the page Special:Blockip does. Please don't add block notices in future as you aren't an administrator. If you want to request that a user be blocked for blatant vandalism, the place to go is WP:AIV. Feel free to ask me if you have any further questions. Hut 8.5 17:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 70.17.182.110 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: _→AzaToth 13:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV report[edit]

I have declined your report of VoABot II (talk · contribs) as this is a vandal reverting bot (it is not human) and it would be highly unusual for it to engage in vandalism, I can find no evidence of it malfunctioning in any way. If you have any problems with the edits this bot is making, please contact the bot owner Voice of All (talk · contribs). Camaron | Chris (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

coincidence? --slakr^\ talk / 11:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ACMEMan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.17.182.110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gsnguy5". The reason given for Gsnguy5's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Spellcast (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This IP was hard blocked by a checkuser. I will ask Alison to review your request - it's strongly frowned on admins undoing checkuser blocks. — B (talk) 04:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please remove the sockpuppet tags of Gsnguy. I am not Gsnguy!! And that is final!

Absolutely not. I'm the checkuser that ran your RFCU case and I'm 100% certain that you're Gsnguy. Hence, also, the autoblock - Alison ^❤ 07:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]