User talk:Alrofficial/Archive 1

Why are you removing this?

Why are you removing Category:Body of Proof from articles? They are meant to be there, that is why I added them. They are the actor/actresses who appear in the show, as well as the producers. — M.Mario (T/C) 11:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

• People are not included in these categories, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Actors by series. --Alrofficial (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sincere apologies, thank you for notifying me. — M.Mario (T/C) 12:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Why are you removing from the Dallas (2012 TV series) page, information that informs readers that the new series continues from the old series and does take into effect the changes that were made in the TV movie? There were references to commentary with the stars and a interview with the shows developer. How is it not note worthy to inform readers of this important fact about the series on the series page? If you though that the wording should have been updated or changed, or even a different title, don't you think it would have made more sense to edit and update the page rather than remove these vital details of continuity?JDD4J4J (T/C) 12:55, 3 July 2012 (CST)

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Nice

The Katherine LaNasa filmography looks so much better now. Great work! Safehaven86 (talk) 18:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

My apologies

Hello, sorry about my revert of your edit at Nashville (2012 TV series)‎. I have no idea how I did that! Yesterday I put up for deletion (as {{db-author}}) the previous file (that you replaced), so there was no reason for me to revert your edit. I didn't even think I was at that page today. Sorry again, and thanks for catching my mistake. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

any good reason why you removed the image

Do you even watch Laurie Holden's movies? It is even said in the introduction of the article that the Silent Hill movie is one of the movies Laurie is best known for. The photo illustrates Holden in one of her best roles. It has educational purpose and depicts the actress's talent, genre and performance. I think describes Holden's ability better than some picture of there smiling at some silly fan meetings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebaychatter0 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Lange

FYI: It was not an intention to remove the template {{cleanup}} recently added by you to the article above. There has been an edit conflict, while I was working on the article, so I just then copied my edit and forgot to add your template as well. Anyway, I believe you should use formal English when adding templates, especially to the top of an article. Reading "Fans writing". What am be that? Use not neutral or else. And at last, when taking an action such as reverting edits, explain yourself in Edit Summary, please. No one reads your mind. Hornik (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Dana Delany

Before I get to the three revert rule, why do you think the older, worser quality image, emotionless, although is more face on, image is better than the more recent, better quality by far and she is actaully look good and happy? — M.Mario (T/C) 20:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your photo is not good, her face not seen.--Alrofficial (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Am I seeing the same image as you? :s — M.Mario (T/C) 20:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Her face is seen, but just in a much better quality. Why dont we get other users involved, create a discussion, so its not just us two fighting over different images? A different users opinion would be good, and if they say yours is better, I would step down. — M.Mario (T/C) 16:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure? Thank you very much! — M.Mario (T/C) 18:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Sorry for the disagreement, maybe we could work together to get the Body of Proof article good? :) — M.Mario (T/C) 18:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but my English is not so good to write good article. I write good articles only for the Russian wiki.--Alrofficial (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Dexter

Rya Kihlstedt is in the cast template with 30+ others. No reason to remove Fuddle (talk) 14:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Archive 11#Navigation boxes. --Alrofficial (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree it's silly, but they should be on all or none. Not 29 of 30.

Jessica Lange page (HALP!)

I keep making productive edits to the page under the username "Sister Jude Martin" and they continue to be reverted. I don't know you, but you've made useful edits to Lange's page before. You can you review mine and let me know if they are inappropriate. I'm not being told what I am doing wrong when it comes to the references and additional information I have provided. 76.109.97.68 (talk) 07:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:American actresses

Why are you trying to speedy delete Category:American actresses. Category:Actresses by nationality was just decided to be kept at CfD. This means we should have the American actresses cat. Plus someone else tried to speedy delete it yesterday and the move was declined. It makes absolutely no sense what you are trying to do.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Alrofficial", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because the use of the word "official" in your name might lead some editors to think that you are "officially" editing for or on behalf of Wikipedia.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 10:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

• On WP:IU there is nothing about official in the name, WP:POINT. --Alrofficial (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, there's nothing specific about the word "official". However, it does state (under the heading Misleading usernames) that:

Usernames that give the impression that the account has permissions which it does not have, for example by containing the terms "administrator", "bureaucrat", "steward", "checkuser", "oversight", or similar terms like "admin", "sysop" or "moderator"

...and...

Usernames including phrases such as "wikipedia", "wikimedia", "wiktionary" if they give the incorrect impression that the account may be officially affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation or one of its projects.

The examples given are not exhaustive. As I said above, the problem is mostly in regards to the second point above, that your username gives the "incorrect impression that [you] may be officially affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation" (emph. added). If you take a look at this list of blocked users, you'll notice many users that have been indefinitely blocked who have the problematic word "official" in their username. In fact, there was a user blocked just now, in part because his/her username contained the word "official".

Therefore, I strongly suggest that you change your username using the methods described above. It really is an easy process. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 14:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. - Alr is not related to real-world group or organization and official not connected with Wikipedia. --Alrofficial (talk) 15:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

(1) I don't know whether Alr is connected to anything real world, I assume it isn't, but... and (2) A new editor might not know that a username with the word "official" is not connected to wikipedia. You are posting notices to people's pages, so it's conceivable that there might be some confusion. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that you have adequately responded to the point, and the discussion below seems to indicate that it is likely that continuing confusion could be a problem. Therefore, I have raised the issue at WP:RFC/N. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 03:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Alrofficial. The result of this discussion was to allow your username. The discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can find a link to the discussion in the archive. You do not need to change your username. Thank you. Danger ^{High voltage!} 00:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits

Please stop reverting my edits. The show and people were shortlisted for the award but did not make it through to get nominated. This is why I have added them, with official sources and reliable ones too, which prove the show was shortlisted. — M.Mario (T/C) 19:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Many shows are listed at GoldDerby forecasts. This source just ABC press-release about 2012 Emmy campaign contenders.--Alrofficial (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Is that not what I am trying to state? Hmm... shortlisted would not be a parameter on the table if it should not be included? — M.Mario (T/C) 20:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Body of Proof shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 04:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nashville discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Justin Davis

The Music of Nashville: Season 1 Volume 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Justin Davis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Actress classification

Thankyou for moving people into the actresses categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Why are my edits being removed?

Hi,I don't understand why my edits are being removed? It said vandalism? I was not trying to do that. I checked the copyright and it was okay to use those files on the page Connie Britton so I don't understand why you're removing them? Morganlynn19988 (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

• Copyright violation. Images is NOT free licensed.--Alrofficial (talk) 08:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

How do I license files found on the internet?

I have tried to find the correct licensing for internet files,but all of them seem to be a copyright violation,even after I put the source & author. I don't understand can you please help me? I see other photos similar to photos I uploaded that were found on the internet also and they were accepted but not mine..I don't understand this? Morganlynn19988 (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

• See Creative Commons license.--Alrofficial (talk) 09:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Katherine Wentworth

If you take a moment to read those references, you'll see that one is a dead link, one is probably not a reliable source and the others are about the actress, not the character. Not every fictional character needs an article. JR is clearly a character that has entered mainstream popular culture and should have an article. Katherine Wentworth is not notable beyond the series at all. --Randykitty (talk) 18:54, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

• In Wikipedia many articles about fictional characters from older shows. This character was very notabile in 1980's, and described in the book Dallas: The Complete Story of the World's Favorite Prime-Time Soap. About 80's shows and characters now not more reliable references.--Alrofficial (talk) 19:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

• Basicallly, what you're saying is: there are no good sources, but, hey: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. That's not enough. We're an encyclopedia, not a fansite. --Randykitty (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

• Regarding this edit: please explain where I did not assume good faith. All you have to do is read the article to see that it is all in-universe and all plot. Even if you disagree with that assessment, what has AGF to do with this? --Randykitty (talk) 20:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

• I see you have been editing since I posted this: I still would like to have a response on your above-cited edit summary, which constitutes an unwarranted accusation. --Randykitty (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Donna Mills

I really think this photo is much better for the infobox than this one. Oddly enough, she looks younger in 1990 than in 1977, but I also find the 1990 photo better in several ways (higher resolution, better pose and lighting). It's always a hassle gathering other editors to come to the talk page and form a consensus, so I'm hoping you will change your mind so I don't have to bother with that. Helliea (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

• Maybe this photo for infobox? --Alrofficial (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that's the same as the one I'm suggesting, only it's not cropped. The cropped version is better because the full version shows other people in the background. Helliea (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Saving Milly TV.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Saving Milly TV.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. It is likely extremely important that you respond quickly and appropriately. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Melissa Ponzio. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cindy(talk) 09:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Melissa Ponzio, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. It is important to source statements attempting to support notability. If you have questions or need help, let me know. That said, do not remove maintenance templates without addressing the specific issues. Thanks, Cindy(talk) 10:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

• On page added 3 reliable sources.--Alrofficial (talk) 10:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  • The number of sources is not sufficient, when excessive content remains unsourced. The maintenance tag adds the article to a queue to flag editors focused on addressing these specific issues. In essence, we need to make sure that BLP articles are accurately sourced, rather than minimally sourced. Again, if you have questions, please let me know. Best regards, Cindy(talk) 10:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
    • I added 2 more references.--Alrofficial (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
      • I would recommend that you focus on sourcing the outstanding unsourced content, rather than sourcing overkill on Walking Tall. What is your source for the personal background and appearances and roles outside of Walking Tall? Focus on those issues. Do not continue blanking the sections in accordance with the Manual of Style or remove the maintenance tags that indicate that additional sources are needed for a BLP. Focus on addressing the issues, rather than dismissing them. Cindy(talk) 10:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Melissa Ponzio, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Cindy(talk) 10:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

• WP:FAITH--Alrofficial (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Honestly, I have the utmost faith in my fellow editors when it's warranted. When another editor continues to disregard policies and guidelines, this good faith quickly comes into question. Your work in alignment with the community standards is appreciated. However, disruptive editing is not. Best regards, Cindy(talk) 10:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Emily VanCamp

Hello sir/madam, i'm letting you know I have returned the Emily VanCamp article to the place it was before your litany of edits today. You are of course perfectly entitled to have issues about it, but suggest rather that you bring them up on the article's talk page, where I and other users may view and discuss your opinion's merits, instead of indiscriminately deleting information you don't believe should be included on the article. Let us not forget this is a collaborative encyclopedia. In addition, the article is currently awaiting re-assessment from two WikiProjects, and I'd respectfully ask you not to mess with it while this process is ongoing. Coming down to it, I'm puzzled with what your issues are. You apparently have problems with grammar and tone? And yet claim to not be a good English speaker? I guess you just don't like my style of writing? But more importantly, I don't understand how you can say I was not neutral in my writing. Just about every thing stated is supported by a variety of sources, and it's not like I only say negative things or only positive things. When she has been involved in something succesfull, it is stated and the other way around, so color me confused. Anyway, kind regards. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

• A critical and ratings success for the channel, receiving awards consideration from organizations such as the Emmys and the Screen Actors Guild, Everwood lasted four seasons, ultimately not surviving The WB's merge with UPN into The CW. - it not associated with VanCamp, she was just supporting player in show. Her article now look like a press release.--Alrofficial (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
  • I'd have to disagree with you there. Are you familiar with the show at all? VanCamp was certainly not "just supporting player in show". She was without a doubt the lead female character. The third thespian mentioned in the opening credits for 4 seasons and 89 episodes, and first actress. It is the first role she had to have made any sort of impact and thus I would argue that it is very, very relevant to talk a bit about it. As for you press release argument, um...no it's just stating the truth. For example, just before talking about Glory Days: "mildly positive reviews but was a ratings disappointment, getting cancelled after nine episodes." Later about Ben Hur: "The film itself received middling reviews". About Beyond the Blackboard: "The film garnered low ratings." All these negative elements certainly wouldn't appear in a press release or a biased pro-VanCamp article. You want biased and promotional? Go check out the biography over at evancamp.com/info/bio/ Take care Happy Evil Dude (talk) 21:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Hi Alrofficial. Why did you once again revert the Emily VanCamp article? I thought we had agreed to discuss whatever issues you may have on the article's talk page. One again it is just your opinion that this article does not follow guidelines. I and others happen to think it does. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 11:50,

Hi why did you change my edit? Madeleine is half british and said in an interview that her dad's side came from England -Stowechaser5-

WP:Sources--Alrofficial (talk) 06:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Upload imgae

Hi, I'm SoapFan12. I was wondering if you could upload this image for me, then crooped it to have two diffrent imageS? The exact same thing you did for Anthony Geary and Genie Francis images. Please? It will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 14:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry, but licensed at the source as "All Rights Reserved", which is not a free license.--Alrofficial (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. When you time, can you please find an 2013 image of Jacqueline MacInnes Wood that uses CC-BY,CC-BY-SA or CC-0? It will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 15:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

not images for Creative Commons licenses--Alrofficial (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

So are you going to upload that image for me? SoapFan12 15:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

CC BY-NC 2.0 not good for Commons.--Alrofficial (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Is there any way to change this? To make good for Commons. SoapFan12 15:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Only if you write message flickr user about the photo license. Maybe the image' author will be change CC BY-NC 2.0 on CC BY-SA 2.0. --Alrofficial (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay, but can you upload this image? SoapFan12 15:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• Also All Rights Reserved. Sorry.--Alrofficial (talk) 15:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay. But can you please write a message flickr user about the photo license for me? SoapFan12 15:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I wrote message about this image.--Alrofficial (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Awesome! Thank you so much. When you have the response, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks again! SoapFan12 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

If user will be change license on CC BY-SA 2.0, i upld image in Commons.--Alrofficial (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks again! SoapFan12 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Image

Thanks for the image! This means a lot! But I was wondeing if you can cropped them making, one image for Clifton and the other for Wood (exact same thing you did for Anthony Geary and Genie Francis)? SoapFan12 18:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

• Only this cut version:

--Alrofficial (talk) 18:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. :) SoapFan12 18:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Help!

Hey Alrofficial, I was wondering if you could help with Jacqueline MacInnes Wood article, espacially with the images? It will be great help! SoapFan12 Talk page here 03:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC) I move 2012 image to infobox, looks more good.--Alrofficial (talk) 04:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! SoapFan12 Talk page here 09:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Witches of East End

Hey. I had not come across that Manual of Style Television article before adding some of the edits to the page, so I apologize for including the International broadcast section. I see it on one page and I automatically assume I can use it on others. I'm just trying to make the page look as informative as possible. I'll keep on top of it though and keep checking the Manual of Style page to ensure I do it correctly. Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow. Codywarren08 (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

• When detailing a show's international broadcasting, simply listing every channel the series appears on is discouraged, Wikipedia is not a television guide. Apart from the channel of origin for the series, editors are encouraged to instead detail English-speaking countries that the series appears through prose form. Special mentions can be used where a show does something noteworthy for a country/international channel, and are best addressed in the appropriate sections (e.g., If the American show Breaking Bad aired its series finale in France a month before it aired in the U.S., this would be added to the "Broadcast" section while The Simpsons breaking the viewership records for ProSieben in Germany on MM DD, YYYY would be addressed in the "Reception" section). This section is best named simply "Broadcast" and also address broadcasting in the country of origin. All information must be verifiable by reliable sources. --Alrofficial (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Devious Maids logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Devious Maids logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Clare Bowen

Hello, please review WP:3RR. Since the recent edits by Soundofair are not obvious vandalism, your actions may also constitute as edit warring. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Danai Gurira

Hello, are you sure about the reverting you did? This is not how she mentioned it in her interview with the magazine 'American Theatre' (September 2013). Beireke1 (talk) 16 October 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 13:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

• Need link to this her interview.--Alrofficial (talk) 13:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
• The interview is not available online. I referred to American Theatre September 2013. The most precise I can be is: 'American Theatre 30/7 (September 2013), p.70-71.' Does that suffice? Beireke1 (talk) 16 October 2013
• Yes.--Alrofficial (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Reverted me?

IN the Jane Levy article, I put an "issues" tag. I see the tag missing, but I don't notice any changes. "Multiple issues" is an understatement for what the article needs, so could you please let me know what happened to improve the article? GcT (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Black Box TV show revert

Hi Alrofficial,

I noticed that you revered an edit to The Black Box (TV series) about filming on Columbia Univ. campus, presumably because the person didn't give a citation. I provided a cite and put the sentence back in the article. Just putting this here in case you wanted to discuss the change.

-- Kevin chen2003 (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Khandi Alexander page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Madeleine Stowe

Mrs. Stowe's representatives donated that image to Commons specifically to replace the old one. You are of course free to insert the old one somewhere in the article, but please keep that one on the infobox. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Not good image for infobox. WP:LEADIMAGE.--Alrofficial (talk) 06:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't understand. Nothing in that guideline spells out why your image of choice is better than the one Mrs. Stowe donated to Commons. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Her face not seen on your image. If you want this image, maybe need photo with only her face - .--Alrofficial (talk) 06:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Ah, OK. Fair enough, we can crop it. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Inga Cadranel) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Inga Cadranel, Alrofficial!

Wikipedia editor Bruno Russell just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating a good quality article. Your dedication to withholding standards of new articles is much appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Bruno Russell's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Edit warring on American Crime

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at American Crime (TV series). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on American Crime (TV series). If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Your reverts turned the article into the worst sort of trashy fan magazine writing. This is just what Wikipedia needs. 32.218.39.214 (talk) 16:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lana Parrilla page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Eileen Davidson

First of all, I just want to say that I admire your work, adding images and cleaning up articles (like you did with Michelle Stafford and others) which comes to my next point. Eileen Davidson has become more known because of her recent Daytime Emmy win and her amazing performance on Days of our Lives and The Young and the Restless therefore I bet people around the world would want to look for some facts and information on her, so would you please help me cleaned it up? I can definitely work on the Filmography and award/nominations sections because I am a pro at those kind of stuff but the writting part (lead, personal life, career etc..) is not my best thing but I can certainly aid and do something. I would really appreciate if you can help me because editors like you are fantastic and this article could really use your abilities. Please and thank you. Cheers,  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 20:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Eileen Davidson - Real Housewives of Beverly Hills

Eileen Davidson's involvement in the show is quoted from a "source" not Bravo, nor Davidson. It's a supposed insider. It is NOT a confirmation. Please stop reverting until an official comes out and confirms it. We don't post tabloid information. 68.81.219.47 (talk) 17:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Tony Award Discussion

Hello - there is a discussion happening at the bottom of this page [[1]] about if the nominations list for Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play should have character names for all nominees. I think the character names are an important part of the list and should be there. The creator of the list refuses to add them because it is a "Featured List" of his. Let us know your thoughts on this. Thanks! HesioneHushabye (talk) 23:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Mary Page Keller

I have tried on a couple of occasions to make some edits to the Mary Page Keller article to make it more readable. It does not seem necessary to repeat so much of the information twice within the article. I have gone back in to this article and made numerous grammatical corrections simply to make the sentences flow better. You do not own this article or any other article. Anyone is free to edit this article.

• WP:LEAD. --Alrofficial (talk) 06:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

How to Get Away with Murder

International broadcasts are allowed. See WP:TVINTL. I don't know what you mean by "notable". The TV community has agreed that English-language broadcast is notable. Stop removing it. Dcbanners (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on How To Get Away With Murder. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:State of Affairs NBC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:State of Affairs NBC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Marcia Cross Image

Hi, I want to change the photo on the page. I'm with her personal management team. The new pic will be appropriately licensed, but I wanted to ask for any guidance you might have to make the edit successful since you're the top editor of her page. Thanks!Marciacrossfan (talk) 04:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring on Melissa McBride

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Melissa McBride. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Melissa McBride. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, please do not revert any additional edits on this article without first discussing them on its talk page. The prior version had myriad grammar mistakes and policy violations. Thank you for your expected cooperation.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• From WP:LEAD - The lead should define the topic and summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight.. Her critical reception has refs and listing as contender for an Emmy Award is very notable.--Alrofficial (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

You are supposed to discuss editing disputes on the article's talk page, not yours. You are further required to reach an agreement before making arbitrary changes. If you revert my edits again, you may be permanently blocked from posting.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Just stop deleting Refs! If you want del her critical reception or info about character - article's talk page before revert edits. --Alrofficial (talk) 05:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You are thoroughly confused and in blatant violation of Wikipedia's policies. You cannot continue to revert edits without first discussing them on that article's talk page. The grammar on the referenced article is atrocious and needs to be corrected.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 12:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Your recent editing history at Melissa McBride shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donna Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

IF LOVING YOU IS WRONG conflict

It's season 2 not season 1 look at facebook & twitter and stop destroying this page. watch the end of the video: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=948191765205532&set=vb.810079805683396&type=2&theater

and https://twitter.com/ILYIW411/status/572574984851365889

• No, it 1B. First season has 20 eps, show was renewed for second season of 22 eps. So, per facebook, this 22 eps will be like season 3?--Alrofficial (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

• Then how come on OWN they "season premiere" and not "spring premiere? Tyler Perry and the Twitter and Facebook say: SEASON 2!!! wikiKid100 STOP DESTROYING THE PAGE or you'll be banned.

Ways to improve A Quiet Passion

Hi, I'm Denver20. Alrofficial, thanks for creating A Quiet Passion!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please Check your Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Quiet_Passion and do the Necessary. Denver F. 17:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Denver F. 17:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebecca Ewing.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rebecca Ewing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

• The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
• Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Kim Dickens

Hi. It's really not a big deal and I am not going to rv your edits re Dickens, but just to explain why I deleted the infobox per MOS:

Per WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.”

As Dickens' infobox contained only minimal info., usually available in the lead/lede anyway, I went ahead but I may have been wrong in doing so. Thanks for looking out. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Deborah Kara Unger because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please follow WP:BRD in a dispute. Betty Logan (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quantico (TV series) revert

Hello, I noticed you reverted my edit to Quantico (TV series) citing WP is not a TV guide, which I accept, however I added the Australian broadcast information per WP:TVINTL which states it is permissable to list the original broadcaster in an English speaking country with a reliable source, in a section titled Broadcast. I believe what I added meets this criteria. Whats new? (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nashville season 3 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nashville season 3 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hunter King

Hey, I was wondering if you can clean up Hunter King's article for me, as well as uploading a image for her? It would be very much appreciated for me.  — JJakathestrength (talk, contribs) 11:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

A suggestion

Hi there, I notice every time you add a reference to American Crime (TV series), you first add a bare reference, then use some ref generator to fill it. Can you not just add a proper reference the first time? All you have to do is copy a reference, then switch out some of the details (it's especially easy when most of them are from Deadline.com). Every time you do this, I've had to come along and fix the reference anyway, as it's misformatted. The author parameter isn't properly split into first and last; it incorrectly includes stray text such as - Deadline as part of the article title; it doesn't include the date parameter; it uses DMY for accessdate when the article uses MDY; and uses work for Deadline.com when it shouldn't be italicized, thus publisher should be used. I've had to do this 7 times now over the last month. It's a bit frustrating. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Family ABC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Family ABC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Changing of the image?

Greetings Alrofficial! Is there a reason that you keep on changing the image for Adepero Oduye? I am trying to use a better image of her.

Home crown (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

• Copyright violation. --Alrofficial (talk) 07:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. It is not a copyright violation. I own the image. Home crown (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• Commons:OTRS, if you owns images. --Alrofficial (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

According to the OTRS, it says that I do not need to contact OTRS since "I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)."

Home crown (talk) 21:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Key "and it hasn't been previously published", your image was published before on IMDb.--Alrofficial (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Alrofficial! I have an image that belongs to me that I personally took. This image hasn't been previously published. Nu aao (talk)

• Liar. --Alrofficial (talk) 07:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

You know that there's numerous people taking photographs there, right? Nu aao (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Catch ABC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Catch ABC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Alrofficial, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenleaf Oprah Winfrey Network.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greenleaf Oprah Winfrey Network.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenleaf Oprah Winfrey Network.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greenleaf Oprah Winfrey Network.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Coco (2016 film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Coco (2016 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Request for 5 minute survey

Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 22:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alrofficial. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Tika Sumpter

Hello Alrofficial. I reverted your edit to Tika Sumpter because it was unsourced. I see you reverted my edit, but added a source in your edit summary. Could you please add an inline citation to support your edit, per WP:PROVEIT. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of American Housewife (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on American Housewife (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Crime ABC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Crime ABC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Alrofficial. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alrofficial. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alrofficial. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)