Jump to content

User talk:Anime Dude

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]

Hello Anime Dude! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Chavatshimshon 08:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Thank you for your contributions for the Negima Character page. However, you have listed unreferenced comparison and unsourced claims in your edit that cannot be verified. Therefore, it has been reverted. Please state you sources, otherwise, it is against wiki's policy. MythSearchertalk 09:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. MythSearchertalk 09:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article [[:Characters of Negima (16-31)‎ and Characters of Negima (1-15)‎]] did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! MythSearchertalk 17:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot provide a verifiable source for your edits, I will start to use verror warnings. Wiki is not a place for you to put speculation per WP:NOR. And no, a fan translated version or a blog is not a source. MythSearchertalk 17:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Characters of Negima (16-31), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MythSearchertalk 18:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, as you did to [[:Characters of Negima (16-31)‎ and Characters of Negima (1-15)]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MythSearchertalk 03:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Negima pages[edit]

Wikipedia is not your own blog or web site, per WP:NOR and WP:NPOV, the articles should not contain personal research and point of view of editors, everything that are included into the articles have to be verifiable sources per WP:V. Sentences like This angered a lot of fans is not going to stay if you cannot provide any published source about it. Also, you keep getting the name of the character Ayaka wrong. It is Ayaka, not Ayeka. If your edits are reverted, try to talk in the talk page before adding it back in. MythSearchertalk 17:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. No matter how they look like each other in the series, per WP:NOR, you cannot just say Nodoka is a take of Shinobu of Love Hina if you cannot find a source from the Author. It is called speculation and is definitely not suitable for wikipedia. MythSearchertalk 17:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:A-Bloody-end.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A-Bloody-end.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Negima!?. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BTW, your edit summary does not mask what you did. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A-Bloody-end.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:A-Bloody-end.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy in Saimoe[edit]

For now, I removed the text y'wrote into that section. However, it won't be permanently eliminated. It needs to be cleaned-up and rewritten in "Encyclopedic" form. If you can get citations and sources for it, that will be great. In the meantime, I will hold that text into my sandbox here. As your text stands, it is very non-neutral. KyuuA4 21:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meyrin[edit]

I have watched the episode, which is why I am reverting. We see Kira fire, then Meyrin. Then it cuts to the grenade in air, which shows 2 shots missing and a third hitting. It is impossible to tell who fired that third shot. Personally, I think it was Meyrin, she was competant and professional without, but Wikipedia is about facts, not opnions. Edward321 (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The wording you posted on my talk page sounds good. Edward321 (talk) 22:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny45-(81).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Destiny45-(81).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]