User talk:Arran Anyrin Bowyn

Welcome!

Hello, Arran Anyrin Bowyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as GUSTAV HASFORD, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Adem20 (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GUSTAV HASFORD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on GUSTAV HASFORD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adem20 (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Messiahs of Gods Army

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Messiahs of Gods Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CatcherStorm ^talk 16:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 63lbs

The article 63lbs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Does not clearly state whether this is a book, a film, a video game, or what. As a result, not a useful addition to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 63lbs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 63lbs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/63lbs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 63lbs. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 63lbs. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. XboxGamer22408^{talk to me} 18:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at 63lbs, you may be blocked from editing. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 18:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at User:Arran Anyrin Bowyn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 20:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Messiahs of Gods Army

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Messiahs of Gods Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 20:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism - disruptive editing, removal of AFD templates after multiple warnings. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Arran Anyrin Bowyn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Arran Anyrin Bowyn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 20:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arran Anyrin Bowyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17447 was submitted on Feb 02, 2017 20:41:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arran Anyrin Bowyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17454 was submitted on Feb 03, 2017 09:25:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arran Anyrin Bowyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this is the correct space to write this. I did not realise the consequences of my deleting notices from administrators during my attempt in working on my page on wikipedia, I have since learned about what one can write and what is not allowed, i.e. personal advertising - to which I certainly was not intending in doing or thought it was at the time. Please in good faith unblock me, this would allow me to emend and correct to guidelines my page. I understand your reasons and will not repeat the mistakes made before, thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arran Anyrin Bowyn (talk • contribs) 14:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no evidence that you have any intention of doing anything other than using Wikipedia to publicise yourself and your work: indeed, your referring to your intention to edit what you call "my page" appears to confirm that. The trouble with unblock requests which say things as general as "I understand your reasons and will not repeat the mistakes made before", without explicitly saying what the editor understands, and what "mistakes he or she will understand, is that experience over the years shows that more often than not such an editor actually does not understand, and if unblocked does go on to repeat the same things. Also, I wonder what you mean by saying that you "did not realise the consequences" of your persistently removing "Articles for deletion" notices. If, as seems likely, you meant that you did not realise that you would be blocked from editing (despite being told that was the case) then how does that not amount to saying "I will ignore Wikipedia policies as long as I think I can get away with it, and only claim that I now know better and will stop doing so when I think it will benefit me"? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request was originally malformed, added in Special:Diff/763661274. I have fixed the formatting. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 14:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]