Jump to content

User talk:ArtistWikier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings...

Hello, ArtistWikier, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.
I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Happy editing! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CH (artist)

[edit]

Hi ArtistWikier, I noticed the page you created CH (artist). My opinion is that it is not properly sourced and you have failed to prove the artist's notability. Please read the article Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and the article Wikipedia:Notability (people). If you think the persone you are writing about is notable, please refine the prose and citations to reflect Wikipedia's guidelines (in the next week). After that if notability issues aren't addressed I will tag the article as needed. Thanks. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WomenArtistUpdates! Thank you for your message and editing. From your revision, I have learned a lot... Also, I guess you have seen this person's notable for so far (from the original article sources and materials). Therefore, I would like to sincerely invite you to make any necessary editing for this article if needed... Many thanks, my WiKi professor :) And have a blessed weekend! ArtistWikier (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, actually I do not see that CH is notable. You have not demonstrated that in the article. It reads like a promotional piece with a non-neutral POV. "World Association of Artists" is entirely the invention of CH and being the president is not indicative of notability. Your citations are often not reliable sources and you cannot use Wikipedia as a source. I am asking that you please read the article on writing about living people. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources as well. CH (artist), as written, fails WP:Notability (artists). I do not plan on editing the article for you. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CH (artist) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CH (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CH (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CH (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://narrationism.com/ and Foundational close paraphrasing. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 16:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello ArtistWikier! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]