User talk:Boboraks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please unblock me

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Boboraks, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boboraks, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Boboraks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


April 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Richie Campbell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to India at Big Four international beauty pageants have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Stop adding materials not pertinent to the article and promotion of other pageants such as Miss Supranational and Miss Grand International pageants just like what you did with India at Big Four international beauty pageants, Puerto Rico at major beauty pageants, Mexico at major beauty pageants ‎, Philippines at major beauty pageants . There is no article in wikipedia related to Big Six Pageants and previously deleted, there's only Big Four international beauty pageants. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to agree with what Richie Campbell said with one exception. I think you're trying to add the information in good faith. However, it's clear that consensus is that Miss Supranational and Miss Grand International are not within the scope of the Big Four. If you think those two pageants should be added, you will need to discuss the matter and get consensus—especially now that there is clear opposition to the addition. —C.Fred (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not revert my edit related to India at Big Four international beauty pageants, Puerto Rico at major beauty pageants, Mexico at major beauty pageants, Thailand at major beauty pageants, I encourage you to participate in the wiki discussion at Talk:Big Six International beauty pageants.---Richie Campbell (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mexico at major beauty pageants. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Richie Campbell (talk) 04:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at India at Big Four international beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing. Richie Campbell (talk) 04:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Puerto Rico at major beauty pageants. Richie Campbell (talk) 04:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at India at Big Four international beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Richie Campbell (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Six International beauty pageants[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Big Six International beauty pageants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Six International beauty pageants for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Six International beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Six International beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vaticidalprophet 12:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Planet International 2019 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Miss Planet International 2019, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Planet International moved to draftspace - unreferenced[edit]

An article you recently created, Miss Planet International, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You already have an existing draft for this article, which has been rejected at AfC. Don't just go and create another, work on your draft so that it can be accepted. And if it still cannot, that should tell you all you need to know. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boboraks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. All your edits seem to be about certain beauty pageants, so either you're a huge fan, or somehow involved. If it's the latter, please make the necessary disclosures now. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Planet International 2 (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. FF-11 (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mutya Pilipinas 2019, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dostana 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 22:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at United States at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing. Stop being disruptive by adding and promoting your so called Big Six International beauty pageants since it had been deleted via wikipedia consensus, otherwise you will be blocked from editing. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hey, you reverted three changes I made at Miss Earth 2021 without any explanation [1][2][3]. I had removed information that was unreferenced or badly referenced. It's considered polite to at least put in an edit summary when you revert. Do you care to comment now on why you are making these changes? - Bri.public (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same for this other place [4] where after my last note, you reintroduced flag icons, against the Manual of Style. My edit summary explained my changes, you did not use an edit summary again. Hello, are you there? - Bri.public (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let’s discuss before you revert again at Femina Miss India 2019. No sub-national flags should be added to the article, per MOS:FLAG. The manual of style is consensus based and applies to every article. Do you believe this article is an exception to the flag standard for some reason? ☆ Bri (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you reverted me and reinstated unreferenced content again, this time on Miss Supranational 2021 [5]. If you don't discuss it here, my next step is a noticeboard. Are you reading your talkpage? - Bri.public (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And again on Miss_Grand_International_2021 [6], followed by a disruptive removal of a merge proposal [7] ... I'm asking an administrator to review this apparently one-way conversation. - Bri.public (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shah Rukh Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 June 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 245CMR. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hanuman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. .245CMR.•👥📜 14:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Grand International 2021 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Miss Grand International 2021, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 12:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Grand International 2021 (2) (June 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "do not add unsourced content" is unclear?[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Miss Supranational 2021, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When ?? What Boboraks (talk) 15:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Stop icon Do not add non-free images to any article other than that covered by the non-free-use rationale. - Arjayay (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boboraks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to Wikipedia please unblock me in future I would use this opportunity in effective way pleaseBoboraks (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 15:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information icon Hello, I'm SierraTangoCharlie1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Asha Bhat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STC1 (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Grand. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asha Bhat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miss Charm international[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boboraks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miss Charm international, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Grand International 2021 (2) (September 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please cite reliable sources to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Xclusivzik (talk) 23:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Grand 2021 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Miss Grand 2021, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 13:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Manika Sheokand. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miss Planet International 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boboraks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miss Planet International 2019, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Supranational 2022. - Bri.public (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have received several warnings about adding unreferenced content. Are you reading your talkpage? - Bri.public (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Miss Supranational 2022. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Miniapolis 22:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miss Planet International 2[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boboraks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miss Planet International 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why ediot Boboraks (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me 🙏🙏🙏🙏 Boboraks (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Charm international[edit]

Hello, Boboraks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss Charm international".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Planet International 2019[edit]

Hello, Boboraks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss Planet International 2019".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miss Grand International 2021 (2)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boboraks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miss Grand International 2021 (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Grand International 2021 (2)[edit]

Hello, Boboraks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss Grand International 2021".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57805[edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58249 [edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boboraks&oldid=1087443905"