User talk:Brianga/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
My information
Brianga,
I dont see what is wrong with putting up information about a new idea that is going to change an industry. American Agent Online was created for the public and a definition of it and how it came about should be allowed. Dont you think? What can be changed to allow it?
Richard Brazil —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.177.171.102 (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Lemonrock
Hello,
Please can you explain what you mean by "inappropriate". Thank you.
Mac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macmaclaren (talk • contribs) 05:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Dear Brianga:
don't cry just cuz i was telling the truth about janice she's a slut and i am going to do it again most likely.
hoping you are well,
derek —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.250.118 (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
More detail required
Hi Brianga,
I am not interested in promoting my business. I simply wish to explain what this web site does.
Having read your references, I am none the wiser. If you can help me reduce the content to something that you consider non-prejudicial, I would be grateful.
Regards,
Mac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macmaclaren (talk • contribs) 05:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Ownership query
Hi Brianga,
Thanks. Do you mean that I, as the creator of the web site, am prohibited from creating an article on Wikipedia about the site?
If so, would it be acceptable to have one of our independent members/contributors create the article instead?
Regards,
Mac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macmaclaren (talk • contribs) 05:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Brianga,
While I am happy to admit that I have a vested interest in my company, I wanted to make a *neutral* entry in Wikipedia, as I realise that it does not tolerate self-promotion, which is entirely fair.
However, I am a little confused about the "notability" issue. When I submitted the Lemonrock entry in November 2007, I cited the inclusion of our business connection with Archant (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archant), but this was not accepted.
Can you explain what the site would have to do or to achieve to become "notable", please? Is there anything that you could suggest to add our site to Wikipedia, without the entry being biased?
Regards,
Mac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macmaclaren (talk • contribs) 05:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Secondary sources
Hi Brianga,
We do provide HTML feeds to several other web sites (such as bands', artists' and venues' own sites) who post their gigs on the Lemonrock gig guide site. However, it seems that we have to "break out" of the web world in order to be notable on Wikipedia! This is a difficult issue! Looking forward to the future, when (perhaps) these "secondary" sources of newspapers and television will not exist separately from "the Web" - what will constitute an "independent" source, I wonder?! I can't answer that any better than you can!
Anyway, thanks for your considered responses tonight. I appreciate your effort.
Lemonrock looks forward to being a valid, and useful, part of Wikipedia, one day, hopefully soon!
Regards,
Mac
Editor, Lemonrock —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macmaclaren (talk • contribs) 06:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Brianga,
I blocked the above user, who you had previously given a final warning, after he continued to create inappropriate pages. I made the block indefinite, but in retrospect, fell that this might be too harsh. Do you think the block should be shortened? If so, would you mind telling me how to do it? Thanks for helping out a new admin! :) faithless (speak) 10:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi
where it says it must be approved by an online editor, does that mean you or can you give me a list of online editors.
thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by No-kaiz (talk • contribs) 05:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
RE: RE: Hi
so how would it be possible to get me up on there, would i have to ask a friend to do it or something? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by No-kaiz (talk • contribs) 05:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Undeletion
You deleted my page on the US Moderate Party. I'm not sure why, and I'm new at this. If you could tell me what was wrong so I could fix it I would appreciate being able to make this page.
harry townsend
what was wrong about that???????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherdogbob (talk • contribs) 06:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Ryan Moss
Hi there.
The article which I started about Ryan Moss is a legitimate article. He is an icon in the Pacific NW, one of the most accomplished photographers, whose work highlights life in Central America. I even think he is actively working on conservation issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Photosnw (talk • contribs) 07:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Why do you hate philanthropy so much. It just tries to help. This can all be resolved very easily. I want my own wikipedia page. To document my acheivments. I have to have a record on the net. Dont send me to angelfire or geocities. Their terrible. Also I am the best thing from richmond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonedead (talk • contribs) 11:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
CSD R3
ok. Please, delete the ones you think are recent enough. I will nonimate the remaining. In the last 4 days I have tagged more than 600 redirects, only 5 of them I had to Rfd. It seems that the definition of recent is a little bit loose. Don't worry. Friendly, Magioladitis (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Can you at least delete the redirects created in 2007? Like "Low Carbon Communities" which was created in September 2007. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Please block 68.190.126.97
This person keeps vandlizing the Kazoo page and I know that this individual has been warned many times. Please consider blocking 68.190.126.97 from editing. Thank you. Chrismaster1 (talk) 18:18, 06 January 2008
Image:The cure live.jpg
I didn't mean that wikipedia is commercial. I meant that the image is tagged as cc 2.0, but if you click the link to the original file on flickr, the owner has it tagged as cc 2.0 Noncommercial. Which isn't an acceptable license for Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Deprecated#Non-free_Creative_Commons_licenses. The Wiki uploader tagged it incorrectly which makes it a copyright infringement. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Oak Grove Fire Department already had a prod removed
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Oak Grove Fire Department, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- Atamachat 21:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Exterior kaifeng synagogue.JPG
Why in the world did you delete the image without consulting me (the uploader) first? It is a much higher resolution version of the previous one. I was in the process of having the lower resolution one deleted. I will be re-adding my image. Delete this one. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I have to say that, initially, I thought a year was too much as there hadn't been a block since last June, but it does appear to be a long-term IP, so I agree. I'm still a little wary about a year's block, though. Perhaps we could make it 3 months for now? Sam Korn (smoddy) 10:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
86.144.67.193
Thanks - it was intentional - I just hadn't logged-in first. I'll log-in and change it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.67.193 (talk) 11:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Deeny Kaplan?
What was this message you left me in reference to? I have never created a Wikipedia page...let alone heard of a Deeny Kaplan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yem75 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the talk page revert! Best, --TheOtherBob 18:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
dear Brianga
You deleted my page on Daryl Woodall. I'm not sure why, and I'm new at this. If you could tell me what was wrong so I could fix it I would appreciate being able to make this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwfishman26 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Tyler V Smith
I have made the article to inform users of a certain website why their websites owner does what he does.
I dont understand the reason for deletion!
Please help Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zero sk8 24 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I am getting sources, they are pending, requesting them for use, give me at least a day please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrEaK40 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
why do you keep on deleting my page that i created. This is not fair. i am entitled to having my biography on wikipedia.org. Please reinstate my contribution to my lifes work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewboy1oo (talk • contribs) 22:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
theres info on the page now —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyequip (talk • contribs) 05:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Brianga
You have just reverted the latest posts for Komati and Vasavi. You say final warning. What else do you want me to do when people keep hacking and writing all denegrations about the Komati, Vasavi and other Vysya articles. The user "Yenkata setty (talk • contribs)" pretends to be a Komati but he is vandalizing and writing all sorts of rubbish about this caste. The user with ip address "122......." always hacks the Komati article and Vaishya article to denegrate Komatis. "yenkata setty" is the same guy who writes from "122........" as well. If you think something could be done please let me know. Please understand and research on "122......." and you will more about that guy. You can find his traces in Komati history. He pretends to be Komati but keeps writing all denegrations. Thank you
toubrojawiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toubrojawiki (talk • contribs) 06:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Unblocking
Look, I'm unblocking User:Abdulbaqi2; I gave him a final warning and e stopped. I was already on it. Thx. El_C 10:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- How is it that your block, which appears on the main block log page, is now replaced by Alexf on the user blocklog page? El_C 10:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
RE: Brandy Dulick Article
I understand why the article was put up for speedy deletion. I'm not contesting it. It was part of a Valentine's Day gift, and it served its purpose. Thanks for letting it stay on as long as it did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonedawg2189 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Semi-Protection
Could you please semi-protect David's page. Thanks --Be happy!! (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to hold off on that for now, unless the user is requesting it. Brianga (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- The vandal seems to have access to a range of IPs (please take a look at the history of user's page and the talk page - also User:Durova's talk page). David will still be able to edit his page if it is semi-protected, I think. --Be happy!! (talk) 07:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to hold off on that for now, unless the user is requesting it. Brianga (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Paris Hilton
"unreferenced or poorly referenced"
Well it was unreferenced. But I didn't add it to the article, did I. I thought the talk pages are for talking. Fine, keep the article crappy. I know better now. Aren't all women bisexual until proven married anyway? The users who want (as near as we can manage) FACTS know to ignore talk pages. And it's the 21st Century. Who the hell outside the bible belt thinks being or asserting that someone is gay is "controversial". Or was your instant complaint just general-purpose boilerplate that has little bearing on what I wrote? yeah, whatever. Dreammmmmmmm on.
A fact is a fact. Because I am an Objectivist. Never argue with one of those. --81.105.243.17 (talk) 02:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
And yet:
Google says: Results 1 - 10 of about 493,000 for paris hilton lesbian. (0.18 seconds)
Well. Who needs wikipedia to reveal the truth. Locked articles get inaccurate fast. Controversial personalities are always locked so that stuff gets censored. Admins sanitize to prevetn libel. Even in England it's not libel when it's true. Off I go to register parisisgay.com
BTW. I CHOOSE to use an ip address.
A 21st century nightmare:
The truth causes rage. When it should say 'Edit This Page'. Life can't take it's course. When it does say 'View Source'
--81.105.243.17 (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Violation of Rights
You have violated my freedom of speech. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfgq1232s (talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Why cant i just write about this incredible article of Jacob Elmore? I mean he IS the coolest guy ever.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jake Elmo (talk • contribs) 17:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Arnob.jpg
This image (Image:Arnob.jpg) is not a redundant copy of Image:Arnob Shayan Chowdhury.jpg. This is a picture of me. I am not Arnob Shayan Chowdhury.Arnob (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
I am curious as to why you deleted this album cover image. You said there is a better copy of this cover somewhere else - I can't find it. --NrDg 05:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Raven.png was originally uploaded as a cartoon character for another article. It got overlayed with the current image and is the wrong image for the justification. If it is OK with you, I'd like to delete the current raven.png to return it to what it should be and undelete Raven-S.png and put it back in the album article. --NrDg 05:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- I went ahead and fixed it all. Reverted to proper Raven.png and undeleted Raven-S.png. --NrDg 05:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Dear Brianga, thank you for your message. I did delete the tag at issue once and that was because I had not saved the entry for two seconds before it was tagged. I strongly believe that the responsibility of tagging has been inappropriately left in the hands of some individuals who seem even unable to be polite in their addressing others. Further, it is risible that an entry can be tagged for deletion, hardly two seconds following its creation, for the sole reason that the editor at issue is unable to trace information concerning the entry with the aid of Google. To my best judgement, this is philistinism gone mad. For what purpose would I create an entry, if the subject matter of the entry did not exist? Moreover, I did not join Wikipedia today or yesterday; why would I perpetrate a hoax now? These are questions that these so-called editors should first consider before tagging an entry. Who appoints these know-nothings and do-gooders as editors? This evening I have spent my valuable time simply to respond to issues arising from what amounts to an act of utter immaturity by a so-called editor, tagging an entry without knowing anything about its subject matter. You may bring to the attention of these individuals to learn at least the basics of addressing others before placing them on positions of responsibility. The person wrote to me as though I were his/her mate on the playground. Yours sincerely, --BF 00:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Rick.chase.hisxpress.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rick.chase.hisxpress.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank You!
Re: [1]. If you want to nuke the rest of his "articles", I won't be complaining. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 05:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Obama's Mother and IP address
(172.168.15.104)It's not my IP address, I don't write trash in wiki. Andy.
You removed some non-vandalism
I just noticed that you removed "The Bat Segunda Show" interview from the Scarlett Thomas page. This was not vandalism, but was an hour-long interview.
So, I've put it back cojoco (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
You're not helping
Brianga:
After looking through your talk page, I can only come to the conclusion that you are not helping. You might want to WP:AGF before editing or deleting content. Best of Luck. Arnob (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Careful with TW
Please have a bit of caution with adding notices of blocks with Twinkle. Here you gave an indefinitely blocked notice to an IP that was blocked for 1 week. Thanks, Metros (talk) 14:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:NokiaTimesSquareExterior.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:NokiaTimesSquareExterior.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:NokiaTimesSquareExterior.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 23:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Fairfield.jpg
Hi. You deleted Image:Fairfield.jpg giving reason:
- 06:32, 3 May 2008 Brianga (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Fairfield.jpg" (I1: Redundant (pixel-identical) to another image in the same file format: This image is a redundant (all pixels the same or scaled down) copy of Image:Fairfieldadsad.jpg, in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not Commons), and)
That is not my recollection, Image:Fairfield.jpg was an image of a mountain top and Image:Fairfieldadsad.jpg of a coal plant, nothing like similar. Could you check out what happened here? Thanks. Rwendland (talk) 10:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- The image was used by Fairfield (Lake District) (this version), and was interesting and a bit unusual. Worth the trouble of bringing back with the vandalistic re-upload reverted I think. Rwendland (talk) 10:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism? Mine or yours
Kindly explain how my edit would be vandalism and how yours wouldn't be if my edit is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.2.79 (talk) 10:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Blackwall Buildings pictures
Can you help me please? I have an email allowing use of the two pictures you've just tagged on Wikipedia. They did this with no reservations. The pictures are Image:Blackwall Buildings 1969.jpg and Image:Blackwall Buildings 1940.jpg. The email reads as follows:
Dear Mr Singer,
Permission is granted to use the two images in connection with the entry for Blackwall Buildings at www.wikipedia.org
Yours sincerely,
Malcolm Barr-Hamilton Borough Archivist
Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archives Bancroft Library 277 Bancroft Road London E1 4DQ 020 7364 1290
(I had previously written explicitly naming the two pictures I wanted to use)
Can you help me please and let me know what tags I should put on them so they don't get deleted for copyright violations?
Many thanks GoScoutUK (talk) 09:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
I confirm that permission has been sent to the OTRS. I have sent two emails as suggested. if I need to do any more I would appreciate knowing. Being new to this process I'm just a tad confused. i'd hate to get pictures deleted when I uploaded them in good faith and hope that I haven't violated anything GoScoutUK (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Photos will be deleted - the conditions set down by wiki commons are too stringent. Sorry GoScoutUK (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what you're doing but I've deleted all pictures I've ever uploaded. It appears that after a week of being uploaded with no problem you've started a vendetta against my pictures and so I've given up. Sorry, but I just don't need the hassle that is involved. Good luck to wikipedia getting pictures at all. I'll not upload any more - even if they're ones I've personally taken. And if this continues I'll just delete my articles too and call it a day. GoScoutUK (talk) 06:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Jones Soda
So this applies even though the image in question is a self-taken photograph made in my own kitchen? If so I'll just go ahead and remove it, then. It needs reworking before it'll be ready for prime time. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 21:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Believe it or not, yes. I had a similar problem when I uploaded Image:Corona_can.jpg (see the talk page there for more information). Brianga (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
M. Lucas
Hi, I must've overlooked the image number I was quoting. If there are any other problems, please let me know. Regards, Solinkov (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
SPY delete
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank you
Thank you for alerting me of my picture of Aiden McGeady. So i give you the sensible award!!.--Adidasnike619 (talk) 08:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Unfree images
Hi, I just saw you tagged a bunch of images as having copyright problems. There's a user who has uploaded a lot of images found randomly on the web and tagged them as having been released under GNU license, though this is obviously not the case. The majority of the images found here, in fact: [3] I've tried to reason with him on his talk page, but he has just reverted my comment. Could you have a word with him and have the images deleted? Funkynusayri (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Connorflanagan.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Connorflanagan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:PippaBlackElle.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PippaBlackElle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
S&M
As noted in the article, it is a relatively new drinking game. Its origin is Murdoch Uni., Australia but has started spreading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpig (talk • contribs) 19:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can you prove that it is sufficiently notable based on WP:N? If so, please edit the article to prove it. If not, it will likely be deleted. Brianga (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Hopstop Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hopstop Logo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Warning
Talking about vandalism will get you deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marmar98 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:Josh_Berresford_2008.jpg
This is a screenshot from a program which I produced and own, I give it freely for use on these pages. Any questions or comments regarding this please ask. Griff (talk) 11:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Just curious... on what basis do you call the image on Michelle's page a copyvio?? Tabercil (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- The image which I removed was Image:MichelleTrachtenberg2008.jpg. It was a photo copied from WireImage.com Brianga (talk) 23:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Tatyana Pic
Hi Brianna I put that picture of Tatyana to brighten the page a bit. Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.248.62.248 (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Fran Healy
Everything is legit with the Fran Healy image. Have a look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frog84 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. Please see Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr for more information on permissible flickr images. Brianga (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry Brianga. You're right. I assumed that license was ok. I contacted the license holder, and he has chaged it again. Hopefully all ok this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frog84 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
You're right again. Sorry. There was a mix up. Hopefully all ok this time! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frog84 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
HEEEELP!!!
hi so i added a picture to krystal meyers' page, and i got a message saying it was gonna de deleted if i didnt get a copyright thing, how do i get that? oh and i got the picture from her myspace, if that helps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chickfila14 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Images from myspace are not permitted to be uploaded here. Please see Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Adding_images for more information on which images are allowed. Brianga (talk) 20:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Britney Spears photo
Where can we get free photos which are the latest pictures of celebrities?WikiArtifact (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- The image has to be completely free - you cannot use a fair use rationale for living people, since a free replacement image is always theoretically possible. See Wikipedia:Non-free_content#UULP for more information. Brianga (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Interesting talk page. I am just wondering the next upload by this user and the next speedy deletion message in his/her talk page. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I blocked the user for removing PROD tags despite a final warning. Brianga (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:GB2K05 - Invasion of the Body Squeezers, Part 2.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:GB2K05 - Invasion of the Body Squeezers, Part 2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Ashad Ali declined speedy
I declined the speedy deletion for this as playing for a national team asserts notability. Cheers, 20:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
re: Image source problem with Image:285.jpg
Thank you for the message. It appears a vandal has wrongfully replaced the image. I will try to get the image back to what it was. JRHorse (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:Screenshot.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 00:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Nile Ranger Deleted due to him not making senior appearance
Nile Ranger is curently on the bench for Coventy FC v Newcastle FC Carling Cup match kick off 7.45pm. Does this count as a senior appearance? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/league_cup/7576358.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.178.18 (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Connor.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Connor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
An award joke...:P
Are you allowed to view source for an award and change the text in it to make some spoofy thing on your page? Cuz somethin keeps tellin me I can't... Gyroid X —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC).
- On your own page, or on my page? I don't see why you couldn't do it on your own page. Doing it on mine would be kind of rude, tho. Brianga (talk) 00:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Please block 216.70.27.226
I just undid three vandalism edits by 216.70.27.226, to Ella Baker, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Agnes de Mille. Please block as appropriate for this repeat offender. Dwalls (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey Brianga, just wanted to point out that the above file didn't qualify for speedy deletion under F1. It was not in the same file format as its replacement. It was supposed to be deleted after seven days as an orphaned fair use image. I certainly don't oppose the deletion, as I'm the one who orphaned it; just wanted to let you know. TomTheHand (talk) 12:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:GacyFilm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GacyFilm.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages
Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 23:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Read me
Im sorry? I havent said anything abou Abraham. I was looking at the page for my homework. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.155.202 (talk) 19:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Ta
Thanks for fixing that revert to Amor, I was just having a look at my edit and scratching my head ;). Good one - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Wack Wall Street?
My fix to black wall street is fine, I was correcting vandalism. You obviously have no knowledge of Hip Hop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.30.40 (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Wack Wall Street
It speaks for itself, The Game is owner of Black Wall Street, not wack wall street. It's obvious. In theory you're the one vandalising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.30.40 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- After doing some research, it seems like you are right. Go ahead and make your constructive edits. Sorry for getting in the way. Brianga (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Shaniwarwada.jpg
File:Shaniwarwada.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pune fort.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pune fort.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry
Er, that was dumb and I owe you an apology. I won't vandalise again. 81.155.57.116 (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)