User talk:Brianhass/Archive 2

Proposed deletion of Vernon Brown (South Dakota)

The article Vernon Brown (South Dakota) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable prerson. Appears to fail WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilentSmuggler (talk) 07:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Jack Horkheimer: Stargazer

	Valued Contributor Award
	You have been identified as a valued contributor and your efforts are appreciated. We are honored to present you with the Valued Contributor Award and we thank you for donating your time, expertise and effort to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. Thanks. (more details)

Thanks very much for the note about the JH: Stargazer episodes. I've scoured the Internet trying to find any information on the older episodes. I've also tried contacting the show and haven't made any progress, so any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks very much. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 06:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Hydroxonium's talk page. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 08:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Stargazers - you beat me to it

Hi Brian, long time no see. How have you been? I just saw that you beat me to the Star Gazers article. I saw the new show/website stuff at the end of the episode a few days ago. I was going to add some updates, but you beat me to it. Anyhoo, I just stopped by to say thanks for adding the stuff about the new website and new host. Thanks very much. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 02:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Brian. I replied over at my talk page. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 03:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kristie VerMulm

Hello, Brianhass, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristie VerMulm whether the article Kristie VerMulm should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Kristie VerMulm, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC) 05:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Donna Lass

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Donna Lass requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Prodego ^talk 01:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Star Gazers (2013 season)

Hello, Brianhass, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Star Gazers (2013 season), appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Star Gazers (2012 season). Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Star Gazers (2013 season) at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 04:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

The bot definitely made a mistake. The 2012 and 2013 pages for the episode listings of Star Gazers do have similarities in certain areas but are not identical or redundant. Brianhass (talk) 08:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Photo request

Do you take and upload pictures? At the National Register of Historic Places wikiproject, we maintain lists of historic sites for every county in the country, and we try to get as many pictures as possible, but we sorely need help in South Dakota — if you go to Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Progress, you'll see that South Dakota has the second lowest ratio of photos to sites for any state nationwide. We have slightly better coverage of the southeastern part of the state, but we're still really weak there. Anything you can contribute would be greatly appreciated. Nyttend (talk) 23:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I happen to reside in the southeastern part of the state (which is unfortunate for your project). However, if I should ever travel outside of my local area, I might try snapping a photo or two for the project. I can't promise anything in the near future because of my work schedule; but, I would like to do some traveling related to my genealogy research.Brianhass (talk) 10:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I specifically mentioned the southeast because I saw that you lived there, but as I said, we're still really weak: there are still several southeastern counties with no photos, and most have just a few. The only reason the southeast is better than elsewhere is that most of the state (including basically the entire northeastern corner, as well as every county on the North Dakota line) has nothing at all; it's not that we're missing one or two southeastern photos. Nyttend (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Nyttend, I just clicked on the page you linked into your message above. I saw that quite a few of the sites are in Union County, where I live. I will seriously look into photographing some of those places for your project. Right now, I'm a bit heavy on hours at work after a coworker recently quit; but as soon as my work load lightens up, I wouldn't mind snapping at least a couple of the photos of places on your list. Three of the places are right here in my town of Beresford. The Railroad Depot (on the list) is now housing a restaurant called the Dark Horse Cafe. I should mention that I have never uploaded photographs to Wikipedia before. Is it a simple process? I've read that there are two places to do it (one of the places allows Wikipedias of all languages to access the photos).Brianhass (talk) 09:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of interstellar radio messages may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Lone Signal]] (20130

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me of the typo. I visited the page. There had been a typo; but, somebody else has since fixed it.Brianhass (talk) 08:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lone Signal

The DYK project (nominate) 16:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Don Jorgensen

The article Don Jorgensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

apparently not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DES ^(talk) 06:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lebanon Hanover

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lebanon Hanover requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SFK2 (talk) 12:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Debra Alden

The article Debra Alden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actress who only had one role total and nothing else and very little info about her (no clue if shes even living still!)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)