User talk:Caniche
|
Colocolo vs Pampas Cat vs Pantanal[edit]
These have been split. See User:UtherSRG/Carnivora. I'm in the process of updating all of the Felidae articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Please read the text above about signing your "talk" edits, and take some time to read the links above on how to be a better Wikipedia editor. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Andean Wolf[edit]
I've nominated Andean Wolf, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Andean Wolf satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andean Wolf and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Andean Wolf during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Coren (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Adjule requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 09:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
re:nativecanine[edit]
Ciao, Purtroppo le mie conoscenze sui criptidi sono scarse (alcuni lavori di Heuvelmans) e non mi sento in grado di aiutarti: il poco tempo libero non mi consente di seguire molto oltre Wikipedia e il mio inglese scritto non è fluente. Grazie, in ogni caso, per avermi contattato. :)
Hi, Unfortunately my knowledge on cryptids are scarce (some Heuvelmans's works) and I do not feel able to help: the little free time also does not allow me to follow far beyond Wikipedia and my written english is not fluent. Thank you anyway for having contacted. :)
--Nanae (talk) 18:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Pampas fox[edit]
Two photo upload as gray fox is photo of pampas fox. See photo of pampas fox and place make of photo-Argentina, there exist pampas fox. It was bad upload and You bad doing that You delete it from this article. Wikipedia is open encyclopedia.
Caniche, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caniche (talk • contribs) 15:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Your English is fairly difficult to understand. It seems that you are trying to say that the images I removed from the article were correct, but uploaded improperly. If that is so, then you need to upload the images properly and have the incorrect images removed. But since I can't understand you well enough, I'm not certain that that is what you are saying. You should consider NOT editing on the English language Wikipedia without someone who can translate your poor English. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Eastern wolf[edit]
You did this editin the Eastern wolf article. You added the references not so proffesionally and for some points the references are probably even missing. Can you fix that please. I can help you with making proper reference tags.--Altaileopard (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Mitla.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Mitla.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Wucharia_Jackal.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Wucharia_Jackal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 09:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
My work for wikipedia is finished[edit]
Dear friends,
My contribution to wikipedia articles was started in 2006. I created and edited articles opportunistically. I finished contribution in february 2012.
kind regards for all,
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Mountain fennec for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mountain fennec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain fennec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 19:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Burmese gray wild dog for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burmese gray wild dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burmese gray wild dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 13:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Mitla (cryptid) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitla (cryptid) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitla (cryptid) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 13:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)