User talk:Carlobulletinph

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Carlobulletinph. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added 05:09, 7 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sakura Cartelet^Talk 05:09, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Legacypac was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:NPOL I already told you this on another similar page

Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carlobulletinph! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm really getting lost that's why I published what I already did earlier. Does this mean I can't improve on the subject anymore? I actually have additional sources which are not online to meet the notability requirements. I'll be reviewing those in the following days.

No you can always resubmit the article whenever you feel that it might meet the notability standards. Just click the button that says submit your draft for review. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 16:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Carlobulletinph, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A big thanks Diannaa! I'm planning to include a list here of some of the subject's achievements/recognitions and that would mean identical wordings like award titles. Those might be flagged and removed too since they have identical wordings right?

As long as you use your own words when describing the achievements/recognitions then it (probably) should be okay. From my understanding as a non-Lawyer (so this is not legal advice) copyright protects the expression of facts not the facts themselves. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 06:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I noticed that there's a "Move" option at the top. I made a quick read about moving pages but I'm not quite sure what will happen if I move a draft entry to let's say "User" or "Talk". Will it have a negative effect on my contributed article?

AfC notification: Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janella Ejercito Estrada (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Janella Ejercito Estrada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question[edit]

I just saw this question. I am slow at getting to the archives. There is no requirement that a source be online as long as it meets the guidelines for reliable sources. To find out if they do go to WP:RSN.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]