User talk:Carrieruggieri

Welcome

Hello, Carrieruggieri, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our conflict of interest policy

Hello, Carrieruggieri. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 13:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 15:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

License tagging for File:Aedp chart.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aedp chart.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Aedp chart.png

Thanks for uploading File:Aedp chart.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

February 2016

Your addition to Draft:AEDP: Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AEDP: Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Before we can fully review this, the number of references per statement must be reduced. References exist to provide verification of facts, and only one, at most 2, references should be provided for each fact. If you have other significant references, you can create a bibliography or further reading section in the article and list those there. Those readings should not be coded as references, but simply given as normal bibliographic citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AEDP: Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Carrieruggieri, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Happy Squirrel (talk) 22:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse reply

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AEDP: Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these citations support incidental information that does not establish or corroborate the notability of the topic. The citations that are on-topic are to primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AEDP: Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This draft is obviously nowhere near complete. Please get it as close as possible to finished before submitting it again. Submitting incomplete drafts for review is simply a waste of time, yours and that 9f reviewers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Carrieruggieri, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok. I have deleted the sections I am actively working on. I will work on them in a word document. The sections completed should not have any copyrighted information. If you detected something could you please let me know what that is so that I can correct it? thank youCarrieruggieri (talk) 17:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If something is copyrighted on the page it is crossed out - that is my cue . the draft is a work in progress. If you found something that is copywriter please let me know what that is. I have been extremely careful. please do not deleteCarrieruggieri (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dianna, I reviewed the information you deleted. I have a few questions and comments about the copyright issue while writing a draft. 1. I first encountered this issue in Feb. and I received this message:" Please remove ALL copyrighted content before submitting for review. Theroadislong (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)". The point here is BEFORE submitting for review. I was working on a draft. 2. a few of the selections you deleted,were selections had copied pasted to my workspace for my personal reference to work on later. These selections were referenced and some had quotes and referenced and had a strikethrough line - so there is no chance anyone would think those excerpts were written by me. Also, a few phrases were tagged as copyrighted.. I see only one of them as sentences that could likely be from another source. 3. some of what was selected to be deleted is technical language: i.e., moment-to-moment tracking... how can these issues be dealt with without deleting a persons page? 4. nowhere in the section about writing in the draft space, does it say to not use copyrighted material while you are creating your draft. Of course, one doesn't submit a draft for review with copyrighted material. 5. New writers should be told that copyrighted material from drafts in progress will be deleted. And, a draft space is therefore a misleading term. 6. Isn't it just as easy to ask me to correct the problem with my draft rather than deleting it? When I saw "all or part of my article is deleted" I practically had a heart attack.Carrieruggieri (talk) 14:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I would like to annotate a few references on my page AEDP... I do see a way to do that using the template provided. Or, I could use footnotes, but, I don't see a template provided for footnotes. Thank you. Carrieruggieri (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC) Thank you Huon Carrieruggieri (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Footnotes for an introduction to footnotes. On a more general note, annotating references seems like a kind of original research to me. We should summarize what the references report, not comment on them. Huon (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joe Roe (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joe Roe (talk) 21:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy has been accepted

Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joe Roe (talk) 16:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AEDP

Hello again Carrie. As you'll have seen above I've just accepted your submission to AfC. I understand it's been a bit of long slog, so thank you for sticking with the process and contributing such a wealth of information.

However, the work doesn't stop when the draft is published! Wikipedia articles are never finished and I hope you'll continue to improve accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. In particular, I find the article quite hard to follow as a non-expert, and it would be good if you could add more context and explanation, maybe cut down on theory and jargon, so it's more accessible to the general reader (Wikipedia's audience). For example, the first part of the article (the lead) should provide a very high-level, concise summary of the topic suitable for someone who has no idea what it is. At the moment your lead goes into considerably more detail than that, so I would suggest moving it to a section of the article and writing a more accessible one.

Happy editing! Joe Roe (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Thank you Joe Roe, I will definitely work on your suggestions. I appreciate your feedback. Carrie Carrieruggieri (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Diana Fosha2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Diana Fosha2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Hi, The image is copyrighted by a person who's name and email is attached to the info on the photo in the "media." Is there a form I need to send to her? Carrieruggieri (talk) 13:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diana Fosha has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diana Fosha. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diana Fosha has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diana Fosha. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diana Fosha has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diana Fosha. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Fosha (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many of the references are associated with Fosha, her organization, or her school of therapy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana Fosha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Diana Fosha2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Diana Fosha2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 21:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carrieruggieri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Carrieruggieri. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Diana Fosha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 07:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Missvain, I am in the process of re-writing the draft: diana fosha. I do not believe I have a conflict of interest based on what wikipedia defines as COI. Though Dr. Fosha acknowledged me in a footnote to her transcript in her 2009 book, we are not professional associates. The acknowledgement was for a statement I made in a writeup to the aedp listserve on her seminar which featured a video-tape of the session she transcribed in the book. She was very generous to acknowledge me. I am a student of AEDP and not a peer affiliate by any means. I am not being paid, or advanced by writing these articles on aedp, and now diana fosha. I suppose the closest analogy would be an undergraduate student's relationship to a department chair in a graduate program. carrieruggieri Carrieruggieri (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Fosha (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is currently still borderline questionable for WP:PROF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana Fosha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diana Fosha

Hello, Carrieruggieri. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Diana Fosha".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cordless Larry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Cordless Larry, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordlesslarry: why speedy deletion? I was about to make a few grammatical tweaks and re-submit.Carrieruggieri (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Carrieruggieri can i submit this draft?Carrieruggieri (talk) 18:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)carrieruggieri@Cordlesslarry:[reply]

oh I see this is not about the draft:diana fosha. i inadvertently created a page cordless larry?Carrieruggieri (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)carrieruggieri[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Fosha (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:WEASEL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana Fosha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 18:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diana Fosha has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diana Fosha. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Fosha has been accepted

Diana Fosha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Joe (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revising article on AEDP

@Carrieruggieri: I saw that you commented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy after the deletion discussion closed (which you are not supposed to do, so User:SoWhy was right to revert your edits there). In the deletion discussion, I voted for a temporary redirect to Diana Fosha while the article is revised to address the problems mentioned in the discussion. I have just moved the article back to Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy, where it can be revised. I can probably help revise it, if I can find enough time to contribute. I am well read in the psychotherapy literature, and I think I have a good sense of what this article may need to address the problems mentioned (see my comment in the deletion discussion). I will also ping User:Joe Roe, who accepted the first WP:AFC submission. Further discussion should take place at Talk:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. Biogeographist (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the same issues that caused this to be moved to draftspace a few years ago still exist. This does not read anything like a formal, neutral WP:OR free wiki article. I would recommend looking at other established psychology pages for how to format one and what in particular we are looking for. I would reach out to WP:PSYCH to see if anyone at that project is willing to help make sense of all this. Also, it seems you might have a very clear WP:COI with this subject and you might want to consider declaring as much. I've posted a notice on your talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me how I ask PSYCH for help with article? I followed the link but there is not place to ask a question. Do you want me to address COI here? Carrieruggieri (talk) 23:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Carrieruggieri. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This needs an answer, please. Fiddle Faddle 07:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Carrieruggieri! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how to submit a draft for review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 14:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 07:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There are several problems with this draft.

1. This draft is much too long to be an encyclopedic discussion of a therapeutic technique.

2. The submitter has been asked about conflict of interest and has not either made the appropriate declaration or made an appropriate and plausible disclaimer of conflict of interest.

3. It was previously redirected as an alternative to deletion following a deletion discussion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. Since it was deleted, this draft should not be accepted unless the reasons for the deletion have been addressed.

4. The article that was deleted is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Accelerated_experiential_dynamic_psychotherapy&oldid=803176419

5. A comparison of this draft and the deleted article shows that they are substantially different, but this draft appears to be a reworking of the deleted article, or based on the same sources as the deleted article. It therefore does not address the concerns of the deletion discussion.

6. There probably should be an article on Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. It should be separate from the article on Diana Fosha, but shorter than either this draft or the deleted article. This draft is not that article that we should have. Neither is the deleted article. (That is, I concur with the deletion.)

7. There is no reason to think that this submitter is going to provide a suitable draft for review. This draft should be blown up and started over.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is an article not a draft...

Please be very careful to stand away from it, lest you be criticised for COI editing. I am aware that your actual COI is trivial here, but it is well to be circumspect. You may obviously participate in any possible future deletion discussion. If that happens still stand back and do not plunge in at once, however hard that might feel. If you need to argue there do it based purely upon policy.

If you feel it needs an edit, please deploy {{Request edit}} on its talk page, with details of your edit. An example might be "Replace [these words] with [these new words] because (citation)"

The most important thing you can do is to be a spectator, to watch with interest what happens to it, but to choose not to be concerned at all. Be its father and let it graze its knees and fall into the river. Do not be its mother and wrap it in warm towels and prevent it form coming to harm. Remember that your words are not sacrosanct however much hard work you put into crafting them. Others may use poorer language, better language, different language, mayaffectf the meaning, but your very mild COI status means you need to stand clear. Fiddle Faddle 06:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I hope you are still on wikipedia. the aedp article was deleted completely - there is no trace of it. There was no notification. there is not even a talk page. Can you help? Carrieruggieri (talk) 02:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timtrent, Thank you for your wise guidance. I love the idea of being it’s after not it’s mother. I am happy to be a spectator and to let it be a Wikipedia article and no longer my project. I look forward to other Wikipedia projects that interest along the way. I’ve learned so much in the last 4 years and I am grateful for all of it. Carrieruggieri (talk) 11:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Fosha

Hello, Carrieruggieri. You have new messages at Talk:Diana Fosha.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Polygnotus (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI (again)

Here you wrote the following sentences:

I use AEDP as one of my methods of practice as a psychotherapist.
There is no potential for me to receive financial benefit, direct or indirect, from the publication of an article on AEDP in wikipedia

The first sentence appears to be true, so the second cannot be true. Especially considering the fact that the AEDP article used to contain promotional language.

If your customers look up AEDP online, and they see an article on Wikipedia praising it, you receive financial benefit from that. That is a conflict of interest. Polygnotus (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]