User talk:Chidera D.O.

September 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Young John have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Young John was changed by Chidera D.O. (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899014 on 2022-09-23T13:54:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sungodtemple. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Young John, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can confirm that i have authoritative rights to edit the information on his page. Could you please restore the version? I am also not paid to make the edits. It is an effort to ensure that accurate information is put out about him. Chidera D.O. (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are paid to make the edits since you literally said you are a staff at his record lable. And you do not have any authoritative right to edit the info on the page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chidera D.O.. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Young John, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chidera D.O.. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chidera D.O.|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. You said you are a member of his record label which means you are paid. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid to make the edits. It is an effort to ensure that the information on his page is accurate Chidera D.O. (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment above. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information on this page is literallyoutdated. What then do you advise? Chidera D.O. (talk) 15:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well first you need to declare that you are being paid (and don't say you aren't because you being a staff member at the record label means you are being paid). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. So, having an affliation with the subject's organization falls under the 'being paid to edit' category? Chidera D.O. (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a paid employee yes. Otherwise it's simply a WP:COI. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Can you go through the edits then, so they can be restored?

Thanks Chidera D.O. (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:6 andrea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:6 andrea.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:5 andrea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:5 andrea.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Bleakz

Since you are a paid editor, you must submit articles through the articles for creation process, and not move them directly to mainspace yourself. Please do not move the page to mainspace again. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s been submitted that way for a long while with nothing done about it. Can you help? Chidera D.O. (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't that there was nothing being done about it - the previous draft was rejected for not being notable. The draft is also extremely promotional and reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:3 andrea.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:3 andrea.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:4 andrea.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:4 andrea.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Bonaceto (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would need a fundamental rewrite to be moved into mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrea Bonaceto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chidera D.O.! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Bonaceto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andrea Bonaceto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Bonaceto (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the exhibitions is referenced. Only half of the awards are referenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrea Bonaceto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 08:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Bonaceto (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject's notability seems to hinge on a single event. No other reliable sources attesting to sustained coverage are provided. It is possible that subject may become notable in the future, but for the moment this appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrea Bonaceto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 01:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrea Bonaceto

Hello, Chidera D.O.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrea Bonaceto".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:SIFAX Group.png

Thanks for uploading File:SIFAX Group.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sifax Group moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sifax Group. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 14:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sifax Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sifax Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.citypeopleonline.com/how-dr-taiwo-afolabi-runs-his-sifax-group/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ASUKITE 15:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article from City People is in fact, dubbed from the company's website. I got my information from the company's website and have rightly cited that. Kindly look into this Chidera D.O. (talk) 11:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:SIFAX Group.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:SIFAX Group.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was gotten from the web- Google search Chidera D.O. (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Sifax Group

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Sifax Group has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.sifaxgroup.com/companies/skyway-aviation-handling-company-plc/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]