User talk:DImi The Online

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, DImi The Online, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 14:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello DImi The Online! Your additions to Flag of the Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag and CoA of North Peru[edit]

Hi. I've recently noted your changes regarding the flag of North Peru. The flag and coat of arms used for North Peru remained unchanged, as seen in government publications [1][2] and the Peruvian real.[3] Therefore, a proposed emblem cannot be used to represent the state if there is a version actually in use. While I do appreciate the effort, I'll ask you to please undo your changes, as you yourself have admitted, you do not appear to have a source for this flag (excluding FOTW). Thanks. 180app (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me, but i only created that flag after seeing a "north peru coat of arms" that did not fit with the flag originally used on the wikipedia page, i will undo my changes and thank you again. DImi The Online (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have accidentally linked the wrong flag, This is the flag i was saying was originally used DImi The Online (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Manuel de Cañas moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Juan Manuel de Cañas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Manuel de Cañas (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

possibly notable but will require sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Manuel de Cañas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright so, there is a spanish article with the same name and no sources for many of the things written. The only things it does have sources for are (in my opinion) not as important (those being of the children of his son Manuel Antonio Cañas Avendaño he had with Ana Josefa Hidalgo Muñoz de la Trinidad). I attempted to translate that page into to English, but i was unaware of what i presume is a new requirement of being an experienced editor to be able to upload translations as articles, that only allows you to draft a translation if not experienced. Also in my translation i did not mention the descendants of Juan Manuel de Cañas, therefore there was no reason for me to source anything. I do not understand why the spanish article does not need any sources, but mine does. I hope this clears up everything and i am terribly sorry if i came of as rude, that was very much not my intention. DImi The Online (talk) 22:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia has much stricter guidelines on inclusion, articles absolutely MUST be sourced. Theroadislong (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me, i will try not to repeat this again, and i am sorry for my ignorance. Thank you again. DImi The Online (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DImi The Online! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Manuel de Cañas (August 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very little of the content is sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Manuel de Cañas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José Ballivián, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Juan de Dios Orozco, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DImi The Online. Thank you for your work on Juan Espinosa (politician). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malespín's War moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Malespín's War, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1882, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supreme director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malespín's War (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is looking really good, it just needs a few more citations in some places. I've gone through and added a citation needed tag in a few places to give some indication, but there are other areas where it could benefit from having a citation. There are also a couple places where you may want to reword things a bit, as it's borderline on whether it's encyclopedic enough. The one which stood out for me was talking about "the most humiliating aspect", which I'd stay away from unless it was a direct quote from someone - and if that was the case, then it should be cited as such. Fix those few things and I reckon you're good to go.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malespín's War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Juan Manuel de Cañas[edit]

Hello, DImi The Online. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juan Manuel de Cañas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juan Manuel de Cañas[edit]

Hello, DImi The Online. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Juan Manuel de Cañas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malespín's War has been accepted[edit]

Malespín's War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]