Jump to content

User talk:DONBOSCO 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Monosodium glutamate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GirthSummit (blether) 08:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DONBOSCO 1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monosodium glutamate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Boothsift was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
The One and Only Boothsift 02:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dharma Huang (February 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DONBOSCO 1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:DONBOSCO 1/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DONBOSCO 1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:DONBOSCO 1/sandbox/Dharma Huang.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]