User talk:DRosin

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, DRosin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A more personal welcome...=[edit]

How you doing? I noticed your recent edits on a number of seduction community articles :) Mathmo ^Talk 04:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

scandals eh? wouldn't mind reading about that, need a more open wiki however... is more flexible however what gets written on talk pages, so I'll sometimes post stuff there until actual references turn up (if it happens). Mathmo ^Talk 09:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society[edit]

A tag has been placed on King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of JDOG[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, JDOG, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JDOG (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Marc Kupper|talk 03:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society[edit]

The article King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable student club

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 19:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's College London Entrepreneurial and Investment Society. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. JohnCD (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Zara Raymond[edit]

Can you please add better citations to prove this person is notable? Bearian (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Bearian, I'll get on it now DRosin (talk) 19:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kemp Little[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kemp Little requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Adam Lyons[edit]

I have nominated Adam Lyons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lyons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lyons[edit]

Hi, I have added the template at the top of the discussion, the instructions are there..read the comment and the instruction is at the end, copy it and add it after the relevant user, don't forget to put the users name or IP. I saw that there were a few more from the earlier section and I thought about also tagging them, but didn't at the time want to seem a bit pointy, but I agree they do need tagging as such, feel free to attempt to tag them, if you have a problem with it feel free to ask me. I did see you are attempting to improve the article whilst the discussion is underway and that is a correct thing to do, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at cleaning up the above article. If you would like to have another look to see whether this affects your comments at the AfD. Cheers. Quantpole (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

about last week...[edit]

On January 6, at the AFD for the the article on Hari Dhillon, you offered that the article might benefit from some good sources and a rewrite. I ask that you might please compare the original that was first sent to AFD against what it is currently to see if your concerns have been addressed. Best regards, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Had a look, the article looks a lot better now, definitely agree with the keep decision! DRosin (talk) 12:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Bacon ![edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bacon has been created, and you are cordially invited to join, and list yourself as a participant at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bacon#Participants!
You may also feel free to add the userbox - {{User Bacon}} - to your userpage, to indicate your participation in the WikiProject.
The Wikipedia:Bacon WikiCup is also ongoing, more info about that at User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011, and User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 08:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Lyons for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Lyons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lyons (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kemp Little for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kemp Little is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemp Little until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Lyons[edit]

The article Adam Lyons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

G11 - overt promo & A7 - 2 of the 5 sources are decent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jppcap (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]