User talk:DanielLerish

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vodka has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vodka was changed by DanielLerish (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926032 on 2017-07-01T08:42:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

DanielLerish, you are invited to try Wikipedia training modules

If you're looking for some guidance on how to get started, try these training modules. basic rules how to edit evaluating articles adding images citing sources copyright rules about these trainings We're trying to improve our tools for helping new editors get started. These trainings are hosted on the "Programs & Events Dashboard", a tool for helping Wikipedia editors organize editing events. You can optionally log in using your Wikipedia account to keep track of which trainings you've completed. If you have feedback, we'd love to hear it!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

DanielLerish, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DanielLerish! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nicnote. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 11:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Vodka

Please use reliable sources. Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

We can't use Wikipedia articles as references. www.slavavodka.com/the-birthplace-of-vodka/ and bestofukraine.com/culture/ukrainian-cuisine/horilka.html are pages that basically advertise their services, they are not reliable sources, see WP:RS. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

You are using spam links as references. Please stop. Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: [1] bestofukraine.com/culture/ukrainian-cuisine/horilka.html is spam. The Best of Ukrainian Cuisine by Bohdan Zahny is an incomplete reference that I can not verify. Materialscientist (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Help For You

I've been reading over the warnings on your talk page and looked at the Vodka Page for all edits. Would you mind giving me a link of the website your trying to use so I can look it over? You can give it to me on my talk page or here which ever you'd like. I also recommend adding something to your userpage (like what countries your from and what launaguges you speak). It allows people to reach you easier especially mobile Wikipedians like myself. Dinah In Wonderland 15:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Now I really suggest you stop using the references for now. Try using the SandBox https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox. Dinah In Wonderland 15:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Vodka. Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DanielLerish. You have new messages at Dinah Kirkland's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dinah In Wonderland 13:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kolomyjka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ukrainian

Kozachok (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ukrainian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm KAP03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Russification of Ukraine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 15:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello DanielLerish, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Kondraty Ryleyev have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ostrogozhsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Your addition to Kondraty Ryleyev has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kondraty Ryleyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paska (bread), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Ukrainian rulers. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC))

Partial block from List of Ukrainian rulers

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 12:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DanielLerish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not participate in edit warring, rather I pursued dispute resolution whilst regularly reinstating what is a fact cited by more than 5 differnet sources. I consistently engaged on the talk page with the relevant party, did not contravene Wikipedia guidelines and did not resort to faecetious or snide edit summaries WP:ES as I was exposed to. I was the first to suggest that a discussion be initiated on the talk page. Four of the seven instances provided as proof of editing warring to the relevant admin were double linked (copies of the same link). I have regularly assumed good faith on the article page from which I have now been banned, and made every attempt to converse and understand the opinon of other parties even though it could be conveyed in a manner and structure that is at times unintelligible and not in the standard language of English Wikipedia. 140 though posited as one of many invalid examples of my alleged edit warring, was an initial edit (not reversal) and attempt by myself to insert a piece of information substantiated by more than 5 citations attached with various quotations justifying the terms used. Other users have supported my endeavours and even formed a consensus with myself before I was arbitrarily banned. I don't believe I was edit warring as I helped form a dialogue, the information for which I have been a proponent of is easily verifiable, not original research and is from a neutral point of view. The information as demonstrated by the numerous citations reflects the current attitude and general academic consensus of the time towards the topic. This ban is unjust, disregards the sincere effort I have made in helping to reach a mutual agreement, inclines towads the other party in removing what to a normal Wikipedian is a corrobroated and normal addition and is based on disinformation rather than the truth.DanielLerish (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are extremely lucky that I did not extend your block after your Checkuser  Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts using this account as well as this one. You used those accounts to support your position in two separate disputes. Please don't waste admin time by posting an appeal denying the connection, the tecnical evidence is clear. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• When I posted the above I didn't realize you had only received a partial block. I've changed that to a site-wide block due to the sockpupptry across multiple articles. The duration remains the same.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)