User talk:Dannyturmoils

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sparkle-pro-visual-web-design/id863015334?mt=12.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sparkle-pro-visual-web-design/id863015334?mt=12. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BiH (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 13:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Dannyturmoils. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Issues on Sparkle's page[edit]

(moved here from User talk:Justlettersandnumbers) Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I'm writing to you about the issues on Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design. Sorry for the problems. I'm one of the authors of the software (I've added to my user page), I just wanted to create a neutral page about this software since similar pages for similar products exists (e.g. the ones listed in List of HTML editors). I know that articles from people close to the subject is discouraged by Wikipedia, but I hope that users will change/improve it, the article I wrote just wanted to be a starting point. I think the article is written in a neutral form, but if it is not please let me know. The first version of the article (that has completely rewritten) received a number of issues, I think some of them could be removed if possible. Thanks for your patience. dannyturmoils (talk). — Preceding undated comment added 14:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, I understood from your username that you are one of the authors of the software (I speak Italian). Thank you for the declaration on your user page. As I think you know, you have what we call a conflict of interest at the Sparkle page. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., Talk:Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design). A good first step would be to add there a number of independent reliable sources with substantial in-depth coverage of the topic which demonstrate its notability – otherwise it is likely to be deleted. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same message applies to File:Sparkle - Pro Visual Web Design Screenshot.jpg -- Diannaa (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]