User talk:Dennis.nasarov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Masering Elliott Wave.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masering Elliott Wave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mastering Elliott Wave.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mastering Elliott Wave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mew cover.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Mew cover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mew cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mew cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alexrexpvt (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Neely article[edit]

Dear Excirial,

I've got copyright notice from you while trying to submit Glenn Neely article. It is a mistake. Article content goes DIRECTLY from Glenn Neely, and he PERSONALLY approved content in article. Link to timer digest PDF you've sent to me (as the reason for deletion) contain just a LITTLE part of article information. Information inside PDF is public, and free for all. I believe we can solve that mistake, just give me hints what should i do. It is very pity that you deleted whole article without deep "copyright restriction" research.

Thank you very much, Dennis signed unsigned comment for Dennis.nasarov

Hello Dennis,
Quite a few things i should comment on here.
  • Best to start with the copyright issue. The PDF in question is marked with "Copyright © 2012, Timer Digest. All Rights Reserved." on the front page, which clearly asserts that the content in it is copyrighted and not compatible with the CC-BY-SA / GDFL dual license that Wikipedia uses. Note that this isn't the only copyright violation; Large parts are copied directly from http://www.neowave.com/faqs.asp, which in turn is marked "© 2013". Whether or not the copyright is owned by the subject of the article or publically availible is irrelevant - the content is simply copyrighted and therefor cannot be used directly.
  • Second issue: The article is straight-up advertising. In 1983, Mr. Neely founded Elliott Wave Institute (now NEoWave, Inc.) and is internationally regarded for his work to transform Wave analysis into a logical, As a respected, innovative leader in the technical market analysis field, Due to its step-by-step, logical approach, NEoWave transformed R.N. Elliott’s intriguing theory into a comprehensive market analysis and forecasting system.. All these are examples of advertising and peacock wording, which is not allowed.
  • Third issue: The article is not supported by reliable sources. What is included is a PR release, a self written text, a link to a self written book on amazon and a forum post. There are either primary sources or not deemed reliable. Any article - and especially biographies of living persons must be supported by reliable sources. Both for the sake of verifiability and the sake of notability.
  • Fourth issue: You are writing on behaf of the article subject, which means that you are a COI - or a so called conflict of interest with the subject. Editing while having a COI floats somewhere between "strongly discourages" and "not allowed" as far as the respective policy goes.
To be quite blunt: The article would need a complete rewrite to be anywhere near acceptable. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 22:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, Dennis.nasarov. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Glenn Neely, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 11:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Glenn Neely. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Status and Advice[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I have deleted the article for the second time, and also blocked re-creation. You are using this article to promulgate the position of the EWI and Neely's version of the the theory. It might conceivably be possible to write an article on him, based on the three LA times articles, though they are not entirely about him--the other references here are unacceptable-- WP requires references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. But I think it will be difficult to show notability without additional coverage. With respect to WP:AUTHOR, I notes his books are in only 65 or so libraries--books about the theory by others are in several hundred. If you think you have additional good sources, you can try again, but use WP:AFC. If you do not have additiona lsources, i do not see how there can be a sustainable article. DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 17:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. j⚛e deckertalk 17:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely[edit]

Hello Dennis.nasarov. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Glenn Neely".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glenn Neely}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dennis.nasarov&oldid=1065584997"