User talk:Dkreisst

Archives

Royal Danish Ballet[edit]

Is there a problem with {{WikiProject Ballet}}? I notice that you reverted it to {{WikiProject Dance}} on the Royal Danish Ballet talk page, likewise Patricia McBride. — Robert Greer (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, unfortunately, the {{Ballet}} does not allow for an independent importance rating for the two separate wikiprojects for which it posts. I left you a message about it on your talk page, but I think that I am not describing the problem very well. I'll try again.

The {{WikiProject Ballet}} labels the article as part of two different wikiprojects, Wikiproject Ballet and Wikiproject Dance. Because it does this, and because both wikiprojects allow for articles to be rated by importance, both wikiprojects can receive importance ratings within the single template. The {{Ballet}}, when written out like this: {{WikiProject Ballet|class=Stub|importance=low|Ballet-importance=mid}} has two separate entry locations for each projects' importance (one at "importance=", for Wikiproject Dance, and one at "Ballet-importance=", for Wikiproject Ballet). Unfortunately, the template always lists the importance for Wikiproject Ballet as whatever is written in for Wikiproject Dance, even when something different is written in, as in the example above. When I figured this out, I posted on the template page the problem, but received no answer. Eventually, I figured out that the {{WikiProject Dance}} did work in the respect that the {{WikiProject Ballet}} did not and, as it seemed to do exactly the same job as the the {{WikiProject Ballet}} when written as such: {{WikiProject Dance|class=Stub|importance=low|Ballet=yes|Ballet-importance=mid}}, I posted that template instead of the other.

I don't know if there actually is a difference in the results of the two templates, I only know that one does not allow for what I think is an important distinction. Please let me know if I am relating the problem adequately, if I am creating a problem that I am not aware of, or if you have any other solutions. Dkreisst (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had little to do with the {{WikiProject Ballet}} template; User:Paul foord and User:Editor at Large are perhaps the people to talk to about this problem (or User:WOSlinker, User:MSGJ, User:Ms2ger, User:Kbdank71, User:MelonBot). — Robert Greer (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave them a note about the problem. In the meantime, would you consider reverting your edits to Talk:Arabesque (ballet position), Talk:Raymonda, Talk:Les Sylphides, and La fille mal gardée as there seems to be no difference between the templates besides the presence of a bug in {{WikiProject Ballet}}? Dkreisst (talk) 22:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is one significant difference between {{WikiProject Dance}} and {{WikiProject Ballet}}, that being the WikiProject Dance and WikiProject Ballet To-do lists. My own view is that these are no less important than seperate importance ratings for the two WikiProjects. I would leave the templates as they are and get the underlying problem fixed rather than change a bunch of templates from {{WikiProject Ballet}} to {{WikiProject Dance}} only to have to change them back later. — Robert Greer (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I had no idea. Thanks! Dkreisst (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you link to those lists so I could see what you are talking about? I assume you are not referring to the to-do template on the Wikiproject page. Dkreisst (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is the templates' to-do lists to which I refer; the underlying lists may be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dance/to do and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ballet/to do. I hope you will wait for the templates to be fixed as there is already quite a handful which will need to be changed back to {{WikiProject Ballet}}:

— Robert Greer (talk) 13:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I see the connection. I don't know much about the to-do list process: does adding a wikiproject template to a talk page make an article appear on the do to template? It seems that the to do templates are updated by editors independently of what kind of talk-page wikiproject template they have (or even independently of whether they have any talk-page wikiproject template). If you have time, could you direct me to a place that would explain this? Dkreisst (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you click on the [show] box in the lower-right corner of {{WikiProject Dance}} it will display the WikiProject Dance To-do list; doing so on {{WikiProject Ballet}} shows the WikiProject Ballet To-do list. There are tabs for edit, history, watch and purge at the top of each, and anybody who wants to can add topics to the lists (or delete topics from them as they are completed). Please contact the author(s) of Template:WikiProject Ballet and Template:WikiProject Dance for assistance fixing the problem you have found before you change more of the former into the latter, as doing so will result in what are clearly ballet articles showing the WikiProject Dance To-do list instead of the WikiProject Ballet To-do list. — Robert Greer (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I completely missed that! Thank you for taking the time to explain. It seems to me that, in the merging of the Ballet and Dance templates, the mergers created a conflict that they should have resolved by providing that both to-do lists would be listed on the merged template.

I don't know how the people over at Wikiproject dance feel about it, but, by adding " |Ballet-todolist = yes" to the dance template, it will change the to-do list from the Dance to-do list to the Ballet to-do list. A solution! You may notice that this is the case for the template that you linked to at Template:WikiProject Ballet: if you view the script, you will see that the example at the top of the page is, in fact, a Dance template. Dkreisst (talk) 06:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does this solve the issue you have with the template? If so, I'll go back and modify all the templates that I added and changed so that they show the Ballet to-do list. Dkreisst (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a |Dance-importance= parameter to the WikiProject Ballet banner & have updated Talk:Royal Danish Ballet to use that. Hope this is ok. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That works beautifully. Dkreisst (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{WikiProject Ballet 2}}[edit]

I've been away from the Internet since last Friday — oh, bliss! — and was on but briefly yesterday or would have gotten back to you sooner.

Take a look at Talk:Corey Snide. I created an idiot's delight template WikiProject Ballet 2 that adds |Ballet=yes|Ballet-todolist = yes| to whatever ever parameters are fed it and passes the list to {{Dance}}.

Let me know if it works properly, so I can replace {{WikiProject Ballet}} with this simpler piece of code, and you'll be able to add you ratings to the template that's there instead of having to type {{WikiProject Dance | ~~category=no |~~ Ballet=yes | Ballet-todolist=yes | and so on! — Robert Greer (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the previous | category=no |. — Robert Greer (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bliss. :)

Do you know how to fix the template at Talk:Corey Snide so that the ratings show? I don't even know how to start creating a template, much less feeding or passing them. It would make sense to me, if it were possible, for both to-do lists to show on the template, as is done with {{WikiProject United States|class=start|importance=|WA=yes|WA-importance=|Seattle=yes|Seattle-importance=low}} for WP Washington and WP Seattle, but, again, I have no idea of how to do this. Dkreisst (talk) 00:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't; a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and I have very little knowledge of template coding, which must therefore be a very dangerous thing! — Robert Greer (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that the Dance template as it currently is an awkward template in that it has so many parameters that make it so long, but as neither of us knows how to create a new template that works or fix the Ballet template, it looks like we're stuck for a bit with the Dance template. I'll finish up changing the to-do lists, just to not leave a job half finished. Dkreisst (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nalo Hopkinson photo[edit]

Thank you for the note -- the photo didn't meet the Commons guidelines and was deleted, so I will go fix the caption in the article. Thanks again! OttawaAC (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atch, darn. Thanks for your effort. Dkreisst (talk) 00:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Johnson[edit]

You're welcome. Amusingly, I thought I was looking at the end of the New Pages list (the older articles), not the beginning, or I wouldn't have jumped on it so quickly. It was only after I made a few edits that I noticed you had created the page only moments before. Apologies if I interrupted you :) heather walls (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No interruption at all. I was impressed with how quickly you got to work on it. Dkreisst (talk) 00:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mariinsky to Marian[edit]

I saw your comments on User talk:WPK's page and you have my support for the position you've taken there. However, I think that we might be advised to raise this on the Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Opera's talk page (of which I am a member) and get some additional feedback and, I hope, support for changing this back to Mariinsky. What do you think?

If you make a statement of your case on the WP Opera page, I'll immediately support you (though I'm in Milan right now and I'll be on my way from Milan, Italy to Santa Fe, New Mexico all day on Monday 6th, so may not have much time before 7 May). Best, Viva-Verdi (talk) 16:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Viva-Verdi,

I was just about to revert it again when you wrote. If User:WPK doesn't involve himself in discussion and continues to move it, then it becomes an admin problem. If he does involve himself in discussion then he'll either have a valid point or he won't. Right now, though, he has not responded to the most current problem presented to him. Dkreisst (talk) 23:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dkreisst. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-04-29/In the media#Categorisation of women novelists.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ballet Dancers[edit]

Hi Dkreisst Can you please tell me why you removed my edits of "as of November 2013?" I am struggling to learn how to use user talk and how to create a user page, so I am sorry if this is the incorrect way to contact you. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 04:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding so fast. I was editing ballet dancer's profiles to say "as of November 2013" because I was told by Tenebrae not to use the world "currently" because that's meaningless over time. As you can probably tell I'm still a rookie at this. Thank you again for your response.SpiritedMichelle (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Algarve Cup[edit]

Hey, the tiebreaker is H2H, so they defeated both CHN and ISL, which means there last game is a given. I thought the same as you first but on dfb.de and more sites they said they reached the final, so it is what it is. I will see if i can find a reference for that on the official website (which is pretty horrbile btw)... Kante4 (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Thanks for doing the research. Dkreisst (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make it "official" here. Kante4 (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Tallchief[edit]

Hi Dkreisst. I see you deleted "See also: Women in dance" from the article. I thought it was important to direct readers to this article as it clearly explains Tallchief's key place in the history of women in dance as you will see if you browse through it. Indeed, Tallchief appears to be one of the very few Americans who have contributed so significantly to the overall picture. As for using it as a category, we already have Category:Female dancers which together with the related subcategories covers literally thousands of articles including some 900 just for Category:American female dancers. As I always try to avoid conflicts in editing, I would prefer to have your consent before reinserting anything (unless you would simply like to make the change yourself). May I also take this opportunity of thanking you for the tremendous amount of work you have undertaken on ballet-releated articles yourself. I see I had missed Emily Johnson when working on the List of female dancers but have now included her. Maybe some of your other contributions (Emery LeCrone, Katarzyna Skarpetowska, Tatiana Baganova and Helen Pickett) could also be added, especially if their biographies could be expanded a bit. I would welcome any other suggestions you may have on improvements. For your information, we are currently working on the biographies of the principal dancers of the major companies listed at here. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipigott, Thanks for your note. I'm afraid I was a bit hasty in undoing your edit, and will revert my edit. I think I felt that the article Women in Dance was not so much tangential to the topic of the article Maria Tallchief as encompassing, and was working on that feeling. But perhaps, as you mention, Tallchief is important enough to share a readership with people interested in a more general topic. Thank you for your work on principal dancers. At this point I am most interested in researching and writing about ballet choreographers who are women and would be happy to take up any small projects you have. Thanks again for your thoughtful note. Dkreisst (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. It is of course equally important to work on the choreographers. Let me know if I can be of any assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me[edit]

You thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
YOU'RE WELCOME!
...along with seventeen layers of fun because you deserve it! It's a pleasure, and I sincerely hope that you enjoy your continued improvement of this awesome encyclopedia and the staggering, huge community effort that supports it! – Paine Ellsworth

16:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you messaging me?[edit]

Don't ever send me five pillars crap, I have no idea why you messaged me 86.191.157.156 (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 86.191.157.156, welcome to wikipedia! I sent you a welcome so that you would feel welcome, and I hope you do. I would especially recommend reviewing the fourth pillar, Wikipedia:Civility. Dkreisst (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Dkreisst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Making Contact (radio program) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Making Contact (radio program) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Making Contact (radio program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquis de Faux (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dkreisst. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dkreisst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dkreisst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Algarve[edit]

Hey, i don't see any problem adding the new "line" when the tournament is confirmed (or info available). Kante4 (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I don't feel too strongly about it. Thanks for the quick response and all your work. Dkreisst (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 14 Miles (January 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:14 Miles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:14 Miles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dkreisst! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 10:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacqueline Green for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacqueline Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 11:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Arabia Women's Cup[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you have created the article of this tournament. Do you also know the scorers of Group B (specifically of Lebanon)? Thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nehme1499. Unfortunately I do not. The press does not give a whole lot of attention to these events. Dkreisst (talk) 05:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I see. Do you think there is any way to be able to know who Lebanon's scorers are? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you could contact the team, but unless they can direct you to a secondary source it wouldn't be useful for adding to Wikipedia. Just looking now at your work: thanks for making all those players' pages! Dkreisst (talk) 07:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised you've been editing Wikipedia for nearly 14 years! What makes you come back to the website every year? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 13:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is useful! Dkreisst (talk) 23:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Striding Into the Wind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]