User talk:51145

51145, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi 51145!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thrash or Die (December 11)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thrash or Die.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 51145, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mötley Crüe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Guns N' Roses discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Meatlantis album cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Meatlantis album cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Freddie Mercury, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure[edit]

Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.

--thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Mötley Crüe. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Thrash or Die was accepted[edit]

Thrash or Die, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

51145 (talk) 07:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poser Holocaust[edit]

The article Poser Holocaust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album by non-notable band, even though they have an article. Also PRODed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 09:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FAC comment[edit]

Hi. Would you be interested in commenting at this FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? There's been some inactivity recently, and some input would be greatly appreciated. If not, feel free to ignore this message :) Dan56 (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 6 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Poser Holocaust page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thrash Or Die for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thrash Or Die is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrash Or Die until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..

Speedy deletion nomination of The Anthology (Nazareth album)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Anthology (Nazareth album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album[edit]

Hello 51145,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jppcap (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album[edit]

The article Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON. Time to create the article when the record has a title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Greatest Hits (2009 Mötley Crüe album) ‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mötley Crüe's tenth studio album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SummerPhD (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mötley Crüe Farewell Tour[edit]

The article Mötley Crüe Farewell Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mötley Crüe Farewell Tour, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mötley Crüe Farewell Tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mutherfucker of the Year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Heavy metal and American

Mötley Crüe Farewell Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wells Fargo Arena

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spectra Place[edit]

The article Spectra Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Borderline A3, non-notable location.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 09:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mutherfucker of the Year[edit]

The article Mutherfucker of the Year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour)[edit]

The article Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails WP:NCONCERT TOUR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 15:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mutherfucker of the Year for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutherfucker of the Year is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutherfucker of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why Though

Please see WP:NSONG. Most songs are not notable. The guideline gives some possible exceptions. Has the song:

been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts
won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award or
been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups? - SummerPhD (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Red, White & Crüe Tour 2005...Better Live Than Dead[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Red, White & Crüe Tour 2005...Better Live Than Dead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 04:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mutherfucker of the Year. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Mutherfucker of the Year. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour)[edit]

The article Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCONCERT TOUR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mutherfucker of the Year[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Mutherfucker of the Year, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD (talk) 03:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Mutherfucker of the Year, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including removing an "Articles for Deletion" notice from Mutherfucker of the Year six times. I don't know if you imagined that removing the notice would somehow magically make the deletion nomination disappear from the listing at Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion, but whatever you thought would happen, your intention was clearly to disrupt the deletion discussion process. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Mutherfucker of the Year, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 19:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Don't jig pages around unless you've very clear about what you're doing. You create a lot of redirects that can be a pain to sort out. I've moved the High Voltage (1975 album) back to the correct title - it was released in '75, as the article says. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mötley Crüe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Anthology (Nazareth album)[edit]

Hello 51145,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Anthology (Nazareth album) for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. versace1608 (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Genre warring[edit]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Tooth and Nail (Dokken album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Valid sources can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. Thank you. Lewismaster (talk) 06:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Heaven's on Fire, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, 51145. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Asylum (Kiss album). - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 51145. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]