User talk:DreamRimmer/Archive 6
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
review
Hi sir can u please review the page Dhimahi Monhiroe (talk) 07:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done! -- 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you sir, Sir if can Pickle Entertainment and Media please check Monhiroe (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Monhiroe, unfortunately, this does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, so I cannot mark it as reviewed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Okey sir Tantiram please check sir Monhiroe (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sir please review this Sila Nodigalil Monhiroe (talk) 08:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- sir can u please review Fight Club (2023 film) Monhiroe (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sir please review this Sila Nodigalil Monhiroe (talk) 08:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Okey sir Tantiram please check sir Monhiroe (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Monhiroe, unfortunately, this does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, so I cannot mark it as reviewed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you sir, Sir if can Pickle Entertainment and Media please check Monhiroe (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
![]() |
Greetings, DreamRimmer. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
|
Tol Bot (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barritus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Godtres -- Godtres (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-51
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- The next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 8 January 2024 because of the holidays.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 December. It will be on all wikis from 21 December (calendar). There is no new MediaWiki version next week. [1][2]
- Starting December 18, it won't be possible to activate Structured Discussions on a user's own talk page using the Beta feature. The Beta feature option remains available for users who want to deactivate Structured Discussions. This is part of Structured Discussions' deprecation work. [3]
There will be full support for redirects in the Module namespace. The "Move Page" feature will leave an appropriate redirect behind, and such redirects will be appropriately recognized by the software (e.g. hidden from Special:UnconnectedPages). There will also be support for manual redirects. [4]
Future changes
The MediaWiki JavaScript documentation is moving to a new format. During the move, you can read the old docs using version 1.41. Feedback about the new site is welcome on the project talk page.
- The Wishathon is a new initiative that encourages collaboration across the Wikimedia community to develop solutions for wishes collected through the Community Wishlist Survey. The first community Wishathon will take place from 15–17 March. If you are interested in a project proposal as a user, developer, designer, or product lead, you can register for the event and read more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Barritus you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Barritus for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Godtres -- Godtres (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Quarry
Hello, DreamRimmer,
I noticed you ran some queries about CSD G13s. I handle these expiring drafts all day long so if you have any question about them and how they are treated or identified, just ask me or User:SD0001 can help answer the more technical queries you might have. Just let me know. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Liz, I have User:SDZeroBot/G13 eligible in my watchlist. I've noticed the bot updates new G13 drafts daily, but whenever I check this page, it appears blank. I thought that perhaps a query could help me find eligible G13 drafts. Is the bot only purging that page to display eligible drafts? I haven't seen any new text added in the page history. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
"Lousiana Rebellion" redirect
Hello! When you said that my closure of WP:AFCR#Redirect request: Lousiana Rebellion was not done properly, I'm assuming you're referring to the fact that I created the redirect from Louisiana Rebellion, rather than Lousiana Rebellion. I believe that "Lousiana" in the request was a typo, and that the requester intended to request a redirect from Louisiana Rebellion. The helper script gave the option to create the redirect but from a different title than was requested, so I assumed that feature was for cases like this. Is there a different way to handle requests with typos in them? Luke10.27 (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Luke10.27, you did it correctly. I thought you had accepted it, but it wasn't created, perhaps due to a script error. Just to inform you, I pinged you in the edit summary. – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. No problem; I just wanted to make sure what I did was OK. I put the accepted templates back around it. Luke10.27 (talk) 01:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted Discord?
Hello DreamRimmer!
Josh and I saw that you deleted Discord. When we coordinated the October drive, Discord was crucial to our communication. I wanted to reach out and make sure you’re doing well and may consider rejoining so we can better communicate during the January drive. Feel free to email me if private reasons for deleting were involved. Thanks! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Everything is fine @Illusion Flame. – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Request to edit
Hello I would like to request edit of baloch people article. the article Baloch People is very short and resource limited compared to other ethnic groups pages on Wikipedia. I've already participated in talk page and raised some materials with the source, but I have not got reply yet.I wish to add subjects in order to improve the article. Kindly see my statements in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baloch_people And if there is no problem, confirm it. Regards. Balash-Vologases (talk) 18:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Balash-Vologases, do you have conflict of interest with this subject? – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Some materials that cited there do not represent origin of baloch people, for instance in history, this statement "according to Baloch lore, their ancestors hail from Aleppo in what is now Syria" This is only a theory and has little validity. I wish to add materials and subject to that highlights that a cited refrence does not support the claim.
- As i already stated, the article very short and simple. Balash-Vologases (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, i just want to improve the article no Biased and worthless content Balash-Vologases (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I added an {{Edit extended-protected}} template to your request section. It categorizes your request for users who regularly process edit requests. Now your request will be handled accordingly. Also, you haven't answered my previous question. If there is any conflict of interest, please update the template to {{Edit COI}}. – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- thanks a bunch, I see a lot of contrast in the article.
- some edits has nothing to do with main article, it is clear personal commentary and trying to distort and represent an arabic origion for baloch. Baloch is Iranic people. Balash-Vologases (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I added an {{Edit extended-protected}} template to your request section. It categorizes your request for users who regularly process edit requests. Now your request will be handled accordingly. Also, you haven't answered my previous question. If there is any conflict of interest, please update the template to {{Edit COI}}. – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
You've got mail
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Review request
Dear DreamRimmer, Hello, can you take a look at my article Draft:Torres Castle (Al Hoceima) And fix some grammatical errors if there are, and mark them as a review as well, if possible. Ali Maalouf (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
Review request
Dear DreamRimmer, Hello there, can you fixing some grammatically issue andb I try to last time for fixing grammatically errors and then please marked my article as reviewed also if possible.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Good work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dear DreamRimmer,
That's Great!
. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)- Hey @Aviram7, I really think you should give another thought to keeping in your AfC reviewer rights. You've been doing great with your reviewing lately, so sticking with AfC seems like a good idea. I'm rooting for you to reconsider and maybe withdraw that removal request you put in at WT:AFCP. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I requested to have the rights removed for some specific reason, however I have reconsidered putting the afc rights back, I don't know why you pinged about this, since till yesterday you were unhappy with my afc actions? Some time ago, it was not easy for me to review draft articles, but till then I was happy to review articles.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- But I greatful to you Dear DreamRimmer for about that.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I raised concerns because you were reviewing some articles without evaluating their notability. Now, you are doing great in politics-related subjects. In the future, you should avoid reviewing articles if you're unsure about their notability. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- But I greatful to you Dear DreamRimmer for about that.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I requested to have the rights removed for some specific reason, however I have reconsidered putting the afc rights back, I don't know why you pinged about this, since till yesterday you were unhappy with my afc actions? Some time ago, it was not easy for me to review draft articles, but till then I was happy to review articles.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dear DreamRimmer, Hello, Can you look at Dharmendra Singh Senthwar and please mark this article as reviewed if possible. Marry Christmas and Happy new year 2024 to you in advanced !🥳. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 47 reviews, for a total of 53 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
Happy holidays!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg/70px-Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg)
– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Happy Holidays, Robert! Wishing you a joyful season and a fantastic New Year ahead! – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
The 12 Days of Wikipedia
|
Hey Chris! Merry Christmas and warm holiday wishes to you too! 🎄 May your days be filled with joy, laughter, and lots of festive cheer! Cheers to a wonderful season ahead! – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:03, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Christmas
- Thanks Josey, same to you! – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasonal greetings!
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello DreamRimmer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thilsebatti (talk) 07:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too, @Thilsebatti! Wishing you joy, laughter, and all the best in the coming year. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Have you read my mail? Thilsebatti (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasonal greetings!
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello DreamRimmer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks and same to you! – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Need Help!
Dear DreamRimmer, can you look at this article I accepted this draft in few minutes ago but when I going to see the page curation tool,'s information box says spam I don't think they are spam? It's really true or not? but this article able to live on Wikipedia!. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
![Christmas postcard featuring Santa Claus using a zeppelin to deliver gifts, by Ellen Clapsaddle, 1909](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/40/Zeppelin_Christmas_postcard_1909.jpg/600px-Zeppelin_Christmas_postcard_1909.jpg)
Hello DreamRimmer: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 13:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks and same to you! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the game of Long Backgammon / Long Narde/Nardy
@DreamRimmer
Hey there! I'm obviously a newbie, just saw the article of a game I adore and often play, but as I see the description of it is completely misleading. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Nardy
The game is not russian and never was. It is of Persian origin, then its 'long' version came to popularity amongst Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia, Chechnya, etc.) and Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, etc.). Only late in XX century the game came into the soviet territory while several of above-mentioned countries was under soviet rule. This doesn't make it russian, isn't it?
So if you do not play some specific pro-russian narrative, but are striving for genuine information, please correct the description/annotation of the game for it to be descriptive and precise. 81.7.94.40 (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello there! If you believe there's an issue in this article, feel free to make the necessary corrections. Remember to include a reference for your change and provide a summary. If you encounter any issues, please make an edit request on the talk page of the article. I hope this helps. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, seems I did, but they were reverted. All I did was entering some short facts/notions fro mthe original article, which is very exhaustive and detailed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tables_game 81.7.94.40 (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from Schalltrichter (04:39, 29 December 2023)
I uploaded some pictures. What are their names now? --Schalltrichter (talk) 04:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Schalltrichter: Welcome to Wikipedia! You haven't uploaded any images to the English Wikipedia. However, I see you've uploaded images on Commons, which can be found here. – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Motor oil for BaranBOT
MPGuy2824 has given you motor oil! Motor oil promotes WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more efficient. It is the drink best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else motor oil, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of motor oil by adding {{subst:Motor oil for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Good job on finishing task 1 of BaranBOT. There are only a few constituencies left in the maint category and I'll be fixing them soon. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MPGuy2824, Haha, can you believe how pricey motor oil has become lately? But hey, thanks a bunch for that one bottle! – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
![]() |
Greetings, DreamRimmer. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
|
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Yoblyblob + backlog drive
Re this diff. They have the npp perm. Should we add them back? Happy new year by the way :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae, their permission has expired today; therefore, the MarkAdmin script didn't display the NPR badge next to their name, leading to their removal from the list. I am going to leave them a message to inform them about this and suggest renewal. Oh, and about the New Year wishes, I'll save that for tomorrow and leave you a wonderful message then! :) – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year 2024!🥳
Happy New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
- Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
- The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.
- The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Reviewing the reviewers
Hi DreamRimmer. I'm following up, as promised, on the conversation at Talk:Ashok Attri (diplomat)#Unreviewed with a bit of advice. I hope that's okay—I don't like to do so uninvited—but I gather from your ping that you at least consider me as someone who knows a bit about new page reviewing, so I'll beg your forgiveness rather than permission.
Coincidentally, just before your ping I was looking at User talk:Reading Beans/Archives/2023/October#Notability tag + marking as reviewed again, which was another time you challenged another NPPer on their actions, in my opinion not quite correctly. In both cases you were absolutely entitled to do so—NPPers can and should be holding each other accountable—and I want to also acknowledge that in both cases, when the other editor disagreed, you pinged another person for a third opinion. That's a great attitude, and unfortunately all too rare around here! But... even though you can challenge other NPPers on their actions, I'd suggest that it's not in your best interests to do so.
You can take it from me, as someone who does a lot of 'reviewing the reviewers' – it never goes down well. Even if you're right, even if you try to be as nice as possible, it's just not pleasant and frequently leads to escalating conflicts. It needs to be done, but not everyone has to do it. I get the impression that you're someone who really cares about the quality of Wikipedia, wants to do maintenance tasks and do them right, and perhaps will be thinking about going for adminship in the not too distant future. If so, you don't want to invite unnecessary conflict! It's the kind of thing that could create grudges, or make people watching think that you're not ready for advanced permissions. Focus on sharpening your own skills, and if you do come across sub-standard reviewing, pass it on to an admin to act on – someone who can afford to piss people off or take a trout or two if they're wrong :) – Joe (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a bunch, @Joe, for taking the time to share your valuable advice. I really appreciate it and will definitely stick to it. You know, I've been seeing some users marking articles without really checking for notability and copyright concerns. Caught a few autopatrolled folks abusing their privileges too. I tried reaching out to admins about it, but no luck with the replies, so I had to step in and handle things myself. From now on, I'll skip discussions with reviewers and just report the issues straight to an admin. Appreciate it and wishing you a fantastic year ahead! – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Visa policy of Fiji
Hello! Why did you delete my edit? Please learn my edit. If it's okay, can you please return it? Thank you for reply. Anes112 (talk) 12:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Anes112: Wikipedia is not a blog or tutorial site intended to offer advice or instructions on how and where to apply for a visa. If necessary, you may include the official visa site in the external links section, but avoid incorporating such information within the article sections. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- So, I can't get my edit back? Anes112 (talk) 13:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you reply ? I will wait your answer. Thank you. Anes112 (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do not restore that edit; instead, make a new edit and use secondary sources to support your changes. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- If it’s not difficult for you, then can you say what exactly is wrong? Is the link wrong? Or did I not justify the reason for editing? Thank you for the answer. Anes112 (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do not restore that edit; instead, make a new edit and use secondary sources to support your changes. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you reply ? I will wait your answer. Thank you. Anes112 (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- So, I can't get my edit back? Anes112 (talk) 13:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
ICTFSOURCES
Hey, about the discussion on the talk page, I think we should start an RfC for the same since we need a detailed consensus for the box office tracking. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @The Herald, Yeah. You should go for it. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am thinking to put a notification out in WikiProject Film talk page before RfC. It might get more comments in the ICTF page. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
![]() |
Greetings, DreamRimmer. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a mop reserved in your name
![]() |
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already! |
Maliner (talk) 14:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for reaching out! I've picked up a ton from awesome folks around me—MPGuy2824, Novem Linguae, Hey man im josh and Illusion Flame. Learning is an ongoing journey for me. While I'm not currently going for an RfA, I'm open to considering it in the near future if someone thinks I'd be a good fit and wants to nominate me. Appreciate your support! – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I would say that edit count is good and all that's needed is a little more AfD expericence and tenure, I think in 3 months we have another budding administrator in our midst. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 21:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for writing Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2024#Anthony_Bradbury_(Anthony_Bradbury). It's a fitting tribute to him. Acalamari 06:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- His contributions live on, forever treasured. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi DreamRimmer. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Clovermoss, my bad, I completely forgot about it! I'll definitely add my responses when I have some time. By the way, I've created a shortcut from the project space Wikipedia:Editor reflections. This way, users can easily find this venue if they want to check out what other folks have stated. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)