User talk:Francoise99x

This is Francoise99x's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alternative Alternatives (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alternative Alternatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 23:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Francoise99x! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 23:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greenman! About one month ago I invested a lot of time to add substantial content, references, sources etc. to this article, following your feedback.

Alternative Alternatives are a concept that is increasingly becoming more relevant.

I hope that someone who is well versed in Finance and Investment is taking a look and can approve the article or give feedback!

Thank you!

Francoise99x

Francoise99x (talk) 07:14, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alternative Alternatives (July 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alternative Alternatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly disagree!

Alternative Alternative is NOT a Neologism but a financial term used in the industry for almost twenty years.

See this 2007 article from JASSA, the finsia journal of applied finance issue 3 2007 https://investucatett.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Alternative_Investments-for-individual-Investors.pdf):

"..other stranger alternative ‘alternatives’ for superannuation funds would include works of art, antiques, stamp collections and even taxi licence".

or here in The Hedge Fund Journal (https://thehedgefundjournal.com/q-a-melissa-hill-ceo-sabre-fund-management/), originally published in the December 2006/January 2007 issue with investment veteran Melissa Hill explaining that "portable alpha overlay programmes and the structured product market are growing as institutions look for alternative alternatives."

We are now in 2023 and googling

"alternative alternatives" finance

yield 29,400 hits!

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22alternative+alternatives%22+finance&client=firefox-b-d&biw=1424&bih=684&ei=y2a6ZLvoA5Woxc8PhdiosA8&ved=0ahUKEwj7-f-X1J-AAxUVVPEDHQUsCvYQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=%22alternative+alternatives%22+finance

I repeat my request, this time with an ounce of criticism, that someone who is well versed in Finance and Investment is taking a look at this article. Francoise99x (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alternative Alternatives (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alternative Alternatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 20:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you are wrong. PLEASE PLEASE can someone who has an investment background assess the article. Alternative Alternatives are not a neologism. Blessing's book is from 2011! All sources cited are published, independent, reliable professional and encyclopedic. Show me what not and don't press a 'delete' or 'reject' button the Wikipedia uber Gods seems to have. Francoise99x (talk) 21:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alternative Alternatives (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement. (If you keep doing that, this will eventually get rejected outright, without the option to resubmit.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alternative Alternatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alternative Alternatives has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alternative Alternatives. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Alternative Alternatives[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Alternative Alternatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://partners-cap.com/investments/asset-classes/uncorrelated-alternatives/, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-you-invest-alternative-alternatives-shelly-hod-moyal, and https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/life_settlement.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:Alternative Alternatives[edit]

Hello Francoise99x! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Alternative Alternatives, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://partners-cap.com/investments/asset-classes/uncorrelated-alternatives/ https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-you-invest-alternative-alternatives-shelly-hod-moyal https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/communication/media-stocks/art-investment/ https://il.linkedin.com/company/givven-net https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/life_settlement.asp, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Alternative Alternatives and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Alternative Alternatives, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Alternative Alternatives. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Alternative Alternatives with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Alternative Alternatives saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]