Jump to content

User talk:GabbyMix01/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: LM5:The Tour Film (Little Mix Film) (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NFILM, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The Little Mix website, the film’s website and press releases are not independent or reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, GabbyManahan01! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

LM5: The Tour Film

The essential requirements is that if a film has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. The key aspect/criteria is that coverage should come from reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

  • Independence: The source needs to be independent of the topic, meaning that the author and the publisher are not directly associated with the topic. Authors should not include members of the production, and publishers should not include the studio or companies working with it on the production and release. The kinds of sources that are considered independent are those that have covered topics unrelated to the one at hand, such as periodicals. Books that discuss a film in a larger context or among other films are also potential sources; see this section's last paragraph regarding the amount of coverage in a source. Press releases, even if they are reprinted by sources unrelated to the production, are not considered independent.
  • Reliability: The content guideline to identify reliable sources says, "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." Sources that have published materials in print (such as newspapers and other periodicals) are reliable if their publication process is considered reliable. If these sources also publish materials online, then it is usually fair to assume that these materials have a similar publication process (see WP:NEWSBLOG). If sources publish materials only online, then their publication process and/or the authority of the author should be scrutinized carefully.

To presume notability, reliable sources should have significant coverage. Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Time Out Film Guide, or the Internet Movie Database. Many of these sources can provide valuable information, and point to other sources, but in themselves do not indicate a notable subject. Similar cases of publications where a mention does not establish notability may include: reviews that are part of a comprehensive review of ALL films in a particular festival, that don't assert anything regarding the notability of individual entries; other forms of comprehensive, non-selective coverage; and some web based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics.

I hope that the above clarifies the issue for you. Dan arndt (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Great! Thank you so much for the information and for your response. GabbyManahan01 (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasabi (Little Mix song) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

See the song notability criteria, which indicate that individual songs are normally not considered notable even if the band and the album are notable. If this draft is resubmitted, please indicate, in AFC comments or on the draft talk page, how the song is individually notable.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little Mix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiatus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne-Marie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasabi (Little Mix song) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please remove Daily Mail and Genius from the sources. Need to list in the lead paragraphs that it charted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasabi (Little Mix song) (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs reviews as a single not as part of an album track review. Also need to specify that it charted in the lead paragraph.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yassi Pressman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viva Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Recent edit to Disco (Kylie Minogue album)

Just wanted to let you know that your recent edit to the page above has been reverted. Per WP:LEAD, the introduction or lead section of an article should summarise the rest of the article, it should not contain new information not already mentioned elsewhere. As such, references are not required for lead sections unless the information in the lead is not contained elsewhere in the rest of the article. This is clearly not the case here. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 11:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LM5: The Tour Film has been accepted

LM5: The Tour Film, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On LM5: The Tour Film. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasabi (Little Mix song) (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 11:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wasabi (Little Mix song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wasabi (Little Mix song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
I am ready to accept this draft with the understanding that it might be nominated for deletion, if you are ready for that. I don't know what the result of a deletion discussion will be. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey Robert McClenon! Yes, I am ready for this draft to be accepted. Wasabi is one of the most well-known song of Little Mix. It caused several discussions by fans and the media during the time of its release, considering the lyrical message the song gives. So this article would be very helpful for people who are interested in knowing more about this song. The song has also been certified in the UK, so I think that makes it notable. I'll try my best to improve this article bit by bit once it's accepted. Thank you! --GabbyManahan01 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasabi (Little Mix song) has been accepted

Wasabi (Little Mix song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Magic (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Mix

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little Mix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Mix

The article Little Mix you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Little Mix for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop using Twitter sources

You claim to have expanded Between Us (Little Mix album) but the main thing I see is you've brought down the quality of the article's citations by adding social media sources (and not even using Template:Cite tweet). Please stop over-relying on social media. I don't know anything else about it, but perhaps this is why your GA nomination of Little Mix failed. It would be one thing if, say, it were a song or album announcement that's so early it hasn't hit the media yet. But if you can't find news sources reporting on what Little Mix said on Twitter after several days, when I could find within an hour of it being announced, sorry, but you're not trying hard enough. Especially when another news source you added was Popsugar of all things. Please also try to stick to the citation order I introduced as well, and do not change the order of existing citations. Ss112 07:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh, and for the record, if you're going to try to add the deluxe edition cover you uploaded to the article, I will be removing it. It's not dramatically different, it's another shot of all three members posing together. It can be explained in the prose without needing to upload more non-free copyrighted material. Brush up on WP:NFCC and please stop uploading additional covers just because you're a fan of the artist(s). Thanks. Ss112 07:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ss112: My apologies for not using Template:Cite tweet. When I was editing the article, I was using Visual edit and not Source edit, and the citations I used were auto-generated, maybe that's also the reason why the citation order was changed. Will keep this in mind for my future edits. Thank you for informing me! ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 08:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Little Mix in 2021.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Little Mix in 2021.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Whpq: Hi! I've already added a short explanation of why I believe the file is not replaceable on the file description page, and a full explanation on the file discussion page. Thank you for informing me regarding this matter. ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 00:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC).

Salesamount parameter usage

Hello,
when using officialcharts articles for updating salesamount parameter in certifications table, please make sure that the number you are citing is, in fact, pure SALES (not sales+streaming), as it is, for example, in article about "Little Mix's Top 20 biggest singles". The article says "When it comes to UK sales and streams, here's how Little Mix's hits stack up... ", meaning the numbers are not pure sales and can not be used as sales for salesamount.
Please keep that in mind for the future. Otherwise, happy editing Kleool (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop reverting to previous versions of articles

Haven't I asked you to stop this before? What is this? Half of what you changed had nothing to do with your explanation. You reverted the article to some previous revision and removed my adding chart positions, correcting grammar and so on. Next time you do this I'll be reverting you outright. Be more careful and don't do this again. Ss112 16:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Magic (Little Mix song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Magic (Little Mix song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Magic (Little Mix song)

The article Black Magic (Little Mix song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Magic (Little Mix song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Magic (Little Mix song)

The article Black Magic (Little Mix song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Magic (Little Mix song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Regarding block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabbyMix01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 136.158.7.251.

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi! @Yamla: I am so confused on why I'm blocked. I just logged in one day and then suddenly I'm not allowed to edit. Turns out that my account is not blocked but my IP address is. I think someone is editing Wikipedia using my IP or is sharing with my IP address because when I checked the contributions of the user who's using the same IP as mine, the edits are most definitely not made by me. How can I solve this because I badly want to return to editing and I feel bad 'cause I clearly didn't do anything wrong :( I hope you can help me with this.

Orphaned non-free image File:Leigh-Anne Race, Pop and Power screenshot.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leigh-Anne Race, Pop and Power screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

File:My Little Pony Friendship is Magic (Season 8) cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My Little Pony Friendship is Magic (Season 8) cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Overcast07 (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

File:My Little Pony Friendship is Magic (Season 9) cover.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My Little Pony Friendship is Magic (Season 9) cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Overcast07 (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Little Mix - Heartbreak Anthem (music video screenshot).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Little Mix - Heartbreak Anthem (music video screenshot).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Little Mix award and nominations

Looking at some of the award nominations that was on little mix page some did needed to get removed because they were just fan voted awards, however you are also removing some awards which are reliable like the BIMA Awards. I've already provided a reliable source for that. Cariad cerddoriaeth (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Cariad cerddoriaeth: Yes, I understand that the BIMA awards are notable, but the source you provided is from The Sun. And according to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, that ppublication is deprecated. It's better if you find aanother source that proves that Little Mix did won the award other than The Sun. Also, The TH0 music Awards and the StarFM Baguio Awards are also non-notable radio award shows as per Wikipedia:Awards and accolades stating that the award show need to have a standalone article to be notable + those are fan voted awards as well. I know it personally since I am from the Philippines, which is the country of origin of those said radio awards. Another point of mine, is that when you visit other artist awards and nominations list, you will not see ANY of the awards I've removed, as they are generally not notable. The only award that I can see that is acceptable right now is the BIMA awards, but you should find a source other than The Sun. Thank you for understanding. ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 16:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Apologises.I thought The TH0 music Awards and the StarFM Baguio Awards was reliable award shows. Cariad cerddoriaeth (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Cariad cerddoriaeth: It's okay, I hope you understand that as of now, there is still a possibility of the BIMA awards and Bizarre awards to be removed since the sourcs you've provided for them is from The Sun which is a deprecated source. I wish you the best of luck in finding a reliable source in replacement of The Sun for backing up those awards. ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Okay. In the meantime I'll try to find a new source but I think the source I included for BIMA awards isn't from the sun? Cariad cerddoriaeth (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Grammar mistakes

Hi i've noticed lately that you've been redoing some of the edits that i have been doing because of grammar errors. i wanted to apologies in advance for you having to clear up after me because grammar isn't my strongest point! Rustyleigh (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Rustyleigh: Hey! No worries! You're additions and contributions to articles are very appreciated. The only thing I can advice is to be mindful of using punctuations. Lately in your edits, I've been seeing that you've been missing out apostrophes, quotation marks, and improper uses of other punctuations. You can go to these links If you're having trouble in using any of them and the guidelines for Manual of Style as a whole. It might help. WP:MOS; MOS:PUNCT (i.e. MOS:APOSTROPHE and MOS:QUOTEMARKS). Also, next time, If you're going to remove sourced content, please provide an explanation for your removal. That's all, have a great day! :) ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 13:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Thankyou!:) Rustyleigh (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GabbyMix01/Archive_1&oldid=1212621831"