User talk:Gabinho

Image copyright problem with Image:Carlos_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carlos_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Steaua-Bucuresti-Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Steaua-Bucuresti-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Gabinho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! mattbr³⁰ 10:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Banelnicolita.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Banelnicolita.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr³⁰ 10:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the original template I have added to the page. Follow the instructions above if you wish to dispute my tagging. The image is of a living person, so an image could be taken and released under a licence Wikipedia accepts, therefore it is replaceable and violates the first fair use criterion. Please do not upload any more images of living people as you have done with Image:ÉltonJoséXavierGomes.jpg and Image:AndreyNazarioAfonso.jpg, as these also fail the first fair use criterion and I have tagged them as such. Please ask if you have any questions. matt br 12:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Hi. Please help with translation commons:Pagina principală. It's phases to translate:

By email
More Pictures of the Day...
Media of the Day
Play media file
Download
File info
Problems playing the file?

~ kintup 08:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BCSteauaNegril.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:BCSteauaNegril.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DaciaMioveni.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:DaciaMioveni.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

You cannot put your personal information in article space. Please leave it on your userpage. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair Use image on User page

Image:Steaua.png is considered a fair use image, and by policy is not allowed on user pages. I have removed the copy from your user page. ~ Bigr Tex 22:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FC_Unirea_Urziceni.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FC_Unirea_Urziceni.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PanduriiTgJiu.gif

I have tagged Image:PanduriiTgJiu.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FCFarul.gif

I have tagged Image:FCFarul.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CfrCluj.png

I have tagged Image:CfrCluj.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg

I have tagged Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gloria_Buzau.PNG

I have tagged Image:Gloria_Buzau.PNG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DaciaMioveni.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:DaciaMioveni.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use image on User page

Image:Steaua.png is considered a fair use image, and by policy is not allowed on user pages. I have removed the copy from your user page. ~ Bigr Tex 22:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dinamo Bucuresti.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dinamo Bucuresti.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use image on User page

Image:Steaua.png is considered a fair use image, and by policy is not allowed on user pages. I have removed the copy from your user page. ~ Bigr Tex 22:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CupaRomanieiTimisoreana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CupaRomanieiTimisoreana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CFR-Cluj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CFR-Cluj.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Liga1Burger.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Liga1Burger.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BlazonPolitehnica1921.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CupaRomanieiTimisoreana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CupaRomanieiTimisoreana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CFR-Cluj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CFR-Cluj.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi there!

I've nominated Steaua Bucharest article for FA, could you please check it out. Just enter the discussion page of the article, follow the link and leave a comment. Mario1987 (talk) 20:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liga IV and Liga V

Take a look at these articles created by User:Dan69en: Liga IV and Liga V. These levels do not exist in the Romanian football league system. Below Liga III there are the county football associations, each with its own league system.

User:Dan69en modified the Template:Football in Romania, adding Liga IV (2 divisions) and Liga V (2 divisions).

Even if you consider Liga IV to be the top level of the county football leagues, there are 42 divisions, not 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edgar81 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Gabinho!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 04:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fc brasov.png

Image Copyright problem

Hi Gabinho!
We thank you for uploading Image:Fc brasov.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football stadium articles

Hi there. I notice that, over the years, you have edited many of the articles on Romanian football stadiums and that you have moved many of those pages to their Romanian names (for example, moving Nicolae Dobrin Stadium to Stadionul Nicolae Dobrin on 19 May).

Wikipedia's policies on article names can be found at Wikipedia: Naming conventions. In particular, take a look at Wikipedia: Naming conventions (use English). It is Wikipedia policy that, in these kind of cases, the English names be used on the English encyclopaedia. I have moved many of the pages back to their English titles accordingly. There are almost certainly more pages that need moving and your help would be much appreciated. Thanks for all your editing. — Lincolnite (talk) 13:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About transfer fees of Steaua

Hello. I believe that Stancu was bought for 1 million. Sorry for my English. --jjmihai (talk) 08:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua current season

I will update periodical. I think that it is better solution. jjmihai (talk) 08:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LigaI FruttiFresh.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LigaI FruttiFresh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct name of SC Vaslui

The official name of the club from Vaslui is "SC SPORTING CLUB SA Vaslui" -> http://www.frfotbal.ro/index.php?competition_id=1. Why do you edited it to FC Vaslui? this is vandalism...Thank you. Vlad9 (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:FC Timisoara.png

Thanks for uploading File:FC Timisoara.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 15:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

What do you say about the new Portal:Romanian football? Mario1987 18:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Patriarch Daniel of Romania.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Patriarch Daniel of Romania.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sal

badea facea partea din lotul echipei a doua.

Orphaned non-free media (File:FC Dunarea Giurgiu.png)

Thanks for uploading File:FC Dunarea Giurgiu.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Ioana Andrei

A tag has been placed on Laura Ioana Andrei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bistrita-Steaua (Cupa)

Cum sa trec meciul din cupa la statistica... FC Steaua Bucureşti season 2009–10#Overall 2? Egal sau infrangere? Eu zic egal... ce crezi? 188.25.213.120 (talk) 19:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Trecem golurile la "Squad stats" sau la "Goals scored" si "Goals conceded"? :) 188.25.214.132 (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Timisoara.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Timisoara.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gabinho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Mircea Rădulescu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cornel Drăguşin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Tudela

Hi, thanks for your note. So, let me get this straight: the ONLY source you will accept as reliable is the club's own website? Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that conflict with WP:SOURCES, in which the main source of information should be a SECONDARY source (i.e. a newspaper or reputable journal) and not the PRIMARY source (which in this case would be the club). Waiting for a press release from the club and not allowing any other valid sources seems to be completely opposite of Wiki's policy.

Now, I don't read Romanian, but a very quick google search resulted in these results: [1], [2], [3] - all of which seem to be saying that Tudela has signed a 3-year deal with Steaua. Wiki itself says that Cotidianul and Evenimentul Zilei (EVZ) are a major Romanian newspapers. Are you seriously saying that articles published in these sources cannot be considerd valid? Because, if you are, then you have impossibly high standards which stand at odds with every other sourcing policy on this site. --JonBroxton (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal

Hello Gabinho, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you.

2010 Australian Open – Boys' Singles

In this edit, why do you change Marton Fucsovics for Jozef Kovalik? Please check draw. Maksa (talk) 00:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Wikipedia

Salut! Nu vrei sa scrii si pe Wikipedia romana?Ionutzmovie (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandurii Târgu Jiu.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandurii Târgu Jiu.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cezar Lungu and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Cezar Lungu, Lucian Filip. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cezar Lungu (2nd nomination) for Cezar Lungu, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucian Filip for Lucian Filip. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut

sunt jjmihai. ce zici de balan? mai e sub contract cu steaua sau nu? pe site nu a aparut nimic oficial... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.235.150 (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 2010 Arad Challenger. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SnottyWong ^talk 19:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Gabinho. You have new messages at Snottywong's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File copyright problem with File:Steaua Rangers logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Steaua Rangers logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 04:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

If some weird adds wrong information on an untidy official website, WITHOUT taking (recent) history into account, should that information be transferred in the same wrong way onto Wikipedia? Catabv23 (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Israeli Air Force Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion crash

I have nominated 2010 Israeli Air Force Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Israeli Air Force Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brasov Challenger

Hey, they just renewed their Order of play for today here. And also on some Tennis Forums they were saying it. Kante4 (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Think so too. Later on atpworldtour.com should have more information. Kante4 (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miloslav Mečíř Jr.

The article Miloslav Mečíř Jr. has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. M J ₉ ₄ 23:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the proposed deletion, as the article was referenced to start with. Netalarm^talk 23:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polina Pekhova

The article Polina Pekhova has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Special Cases ^{LOOK, A TALK PAGE!!!!} 16:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diana Stomlega for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Diana Stomlega, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Stomlega until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cindamuse (talk) 09:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilinca Stoica for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ilinca Stoica, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilinca Stoica until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cindamuse (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ingrid Radu for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ingrid Radu, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Radu until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cindamuse (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITF

The new color scheme is better and more pleasing to the eye, here is a suggestion on how you can do it faster and not do it one-by-one, you copy the whole text and replace the color on word or notepad, then it will be faster. Dencod16 (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A greeting

Hello there. I found you in WP:TENNIS and noticed that you're interested in far different various Romania-related topics and I just want to inquire if you are interested in history as well. I recently expanded the Black Army of Hungary and since it covers events in Wallachia I thought you might want to take a look at it. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 21:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am interested in history too! I'll take a look! Thanks. (Gabinho^>:) 21:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Excuse my mistakes/errors in the article if you come across any but I lack enough sources for the Wallachian battles, so I cut those parts quite short. I have some blurry spots on the matter of Kilia, a town/citadel co-defended by Hungarians and Walachians. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 21:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julia Stamatova

The article Julia Stamatova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability requirements under WP:ATH. Needs to have won at least one ITF tournamnet of at least $25,000 value. As of yet has only been runner up in a $10,000 ITF tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 00:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dalia Zafirova

The article Dalia Zafirova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable under WP:ATH criteria. Needs to win a $25,000 ITF, but has only won a $10,000. Additionally, I cannot find any proof that she played on the Bulgarian Fed Cup team (which, if a source can be provided, would qualify her under WP:ATH.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viktoriya Tomova

The article Viktoriya Tomova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:ATH. Hasn't won a $25,000 ITF tournament yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nadejda Vassileva

The article Nadejda Vassileva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATH. Hasn't won a $25,000 ITF tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isabella Shinikova

The article Isabella Shinikova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATH. Hasn't won a $25,000 ITF tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martina Gledacheva

The article Martina Gledacheva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATH. Hasn't won a $25,000 ITF Tournament, and I can find no proof that she has played for Bulgaria in the Fed Cup.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksandrina Naydenova

The article Aleksandrina Naydenova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATH. Hasn't won a $25,000 ITF tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 06:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philipp Oswald

The article Philipp Oswald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATH. No wins, no play in Davis cup, or in the main draw of a grand slam/major tournament

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philipp Oswald for deletion

The article Philipp Oswald is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Oswald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cind.amuse 08:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miloslav Mečíř Jr. for deletion

The article Miloslav Mečíř Jr. is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miloslav Mečíř Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cind.amuse 09:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petru-Alexandru Luncanu

The article Petru-Alexandru Luncanu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG. Has yet to win a challenger tour or play in the main draw of a grand slam or do anything else of note.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victor Anagnastopol

The article Victor Anagnastopol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 03:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cătălin Gârd

The article Cătălin Gârd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 03:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cătălin Gârd

The article Cătălin Gârd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 03:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua

Văd că te-ai chinuit mult cu propunerile articolului la AC şi AB. Dacă articolul de pe Wikipedia română ar fi la fel de dezvoltat ar avea mari sanse sa fie promovat la AC.Ionutzmovie (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Tacchini

I came to the Tacchini article from the business side and did quite a bit of work on it. One step I took with a little uncertainty was to take off a top-of-the-page "needs citations" tag and put the in-line template where there were lines or blocks without citation. I think it's OK, but I was then perusing the article history and noticed one of your edits as one of the unfootnoted "Sponsored players: Past" (Lindstedt). (I was curious how you knew the cricketer wasn't sponsored, too, while we're on this one. And, second, I took a small chance by calling all but Djokovic "Past" based just on the MarketWatch article which had brought me to the page. Hope the article was right.) Anyway, coming next to your page it's clear European tennis is a forté of yours and maybe you'd like to take up the challenge of trying to find citations for the article where needed. (I ended up my editing hoping the company would see it and do a "History" page on its website.)

Well, there's my bit for what it's worth. Thanks for your work, and cheers. Swliv (talk) 00:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valeria Solovieva. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharlieEchoTango (discuss) 00:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valeria Solovieva. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 20:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brasov

Hey, could you please finish the article the next time instead of leaving it half empty? I added the remaining seeds and other stuff... Kante4 (talk) 15:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't knew the other seeds. All I knew were the first 2 seeds from the article which is listed as a source. (Gabinho^>:) 16:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

WTA templates

Ciao! I stumbled on your very useful templates on women players that you seem painstakingly keeping up to date... just a not: can you please keep them without use of boldface in the title? It generates an ugly "double boldface" effect when the template is executed. Ciao and good work! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbara Sobaszkiewicz

The article Barbara Sobaszkiewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS no ITF 50k+ wins, no WTA tournament appearances, no Fed cup play.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 03:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ekaterina Yashina

The article Ekaterina Yashina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTENNIS. No ITF 50k+ wins, major WTA play or FED cup

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 03:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

PROD of tennis articles.

Per my understanding the new WP:NTENNIS guidelines apply to all articles regardless of when they were created. Additionally, per the new guidelines a player has to play in a higher level WTA tournament (Finals, major, or premier tournaments) none of which Tashkent is. Ravendrop 04:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

My mistake on Yashina. However the other is still not notable under NTENNIS. Ravendrop 04:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I couldn't find anything that said that the new guidelines do not effect article made before the change, so I've posed the question to the Tennis Wikiproject (see here). I'll hold off nominating for deletion Barbara Sobaszkiewicz until I get an answer there. Ravendrop 05:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Barbara Sobaszkiewicz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Sobaszkiewicz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Sobaszkiewicz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ravendrop 06:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Tennis

Hey, can´t we wait until the draw is out or the Seeds are known before creating an empty article like here? Kante4 (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I guess we can. My bad... (Gabinho^>:) 10:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]

No problem, just a reminder for next time. ;) Kante4 (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

couple problems in talk pages

fyi... you may want to update your template for talk pages. There is no "living" parameter in the {{WikiProject Tennis}} banner. There is no longer a "priority" parameter in the {{WikiProject Biography}} banner. Priority parameter was replaced with sports-priority, politician-priority, etc. Bgwhite (talk) 06:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

couple problems in talk pages

Please, help me, punish the guy that always redirects the ITF tournament in Dubai, please.Catgamer (talk) 23:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Kültürpark Cup

The article 2011 Kültürpark Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

women's ITF $25k tournament. Fails WP:NTENNIS. Similar articles have been anonymously deleted recently. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ITF Djibouti Open (1)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 09:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 Internazionali Femminili di Tennis – Singles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Internazionali Femminili di Tennis – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Internazionali Femminili di Tennis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of 2011 Kültürpark Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Kültürpark Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Kültürpark Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 13:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Torneo Internazionale Femminile Città di Grado

The article 2011 Torneo Internazionale Femminile Città di Grado has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Trofeul Popeci

The article 2011 Trofeul Popeci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 14:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 Trofeul Popeci for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Trofeul Popeci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Trofeul Popeci until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Trofeul Popeci – Singles

The article 2011 Trofeul Popeci – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Under $35k tournament failing NTENNIS. Main article was already deleted in AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2011_Trofeul_Popeci

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Trofeul Popeci – Doubles

The article 2011 Trofeul Popeci – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Under $35k tournament failing NTENNIS. Main article was already deleted in AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2011_Trofeul_Popeci

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining WikiProject Romania! Please let us know if you have any questions, suggestions or if there are certain areas where you have expertise and want to participate. Looking forward to collaborate on great articles! --Codrin.B (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trofeul Popeci 2011.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trofeul Popeci 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish names

Hello Gabinho,

I must disagree with your revert. Only married names use hyphens. Look at these examples of Spanish tennisplayers:

and I only got as far as the C.

In addition, refer to the Catalan article ca:Lara Arruabarrena Vecino and the Spanish article es:Lara Arruabarrena (look at the first paragraph there).

Also be aware of the fact that the WTA website contains many mistakes and is not to be trusted blindly.

Kind regards, Vinkje83 (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Sophie Lefèvre

Hi, ancient history I'm afraid :) but I note that you created the BLP on Sophie Lefèvre but that it was moved and the accent deleted from lede first line. Do you mind if I ask, was there any discussion about this before the RM where you attempted to have it moved back? My understanding is that by default a RM should start from status quo? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gabinho, actually no, Sophie Lefèvre isn't the only one. I went through all the category:French tennis players after I saw what had happened, and found 5 more, they are in a joint RM under Talk:Stephane Huet. Then afterwards I also found Paul Feret. But I believe that that's the lot for all en.wp. Those would be the only 7 BLPs not at their names. Hopefully we can finish this now and have some peace. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Invitation to diacritics guideline discussion at WT:BLP

Hi, you were one of 100+ Users who has commented on a living person Requested Move featuring diacritics (e.g. the é in Beyoncé Knowles) in the last 30 days. Following closure of Talk:Stephane Huet RM, a tightening of BLP guidelines is proposed. Your contribution is invited to WT:BLP to discuss drafting a proposal for tightening BLP accuracy guidelines for names. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited Florin Mergea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rome 2 and Santiago Ventura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TAROM Flight 3107 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAROM Flight 3107 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAROM Flight 3107 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 13:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for own quality editing. I noted your recent page move to David Savić, and while I think it'd be common sense, unfortunately a WP:RM is needed so I have put one in (now). FWIW, the several RMs currently in seem to be almost at the end of the "English names" among the 100,000s of BLPs. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CS Alro Slatina logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CS Alro Slatina logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Fcm dunarea galati.png

Thanks for uploading File:Fcm dunarea galati.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arad Challenger logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arad Challenger logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zuzana Zlochová

The article Zuzana Zlochová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Maybe I'm missing something, but as it stands this player is not notable per Guidelines. Did she play Fed Cup or something I missed? If not those tiny $10,000 wins are a dime a dozen. If she is notable please list it in the article as to why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudia Enache

The article Claudia Enache has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Enache is not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category (in fact, none at all), and there are no further claims that she is otherwise, at present, generally notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fcm dunarea galati.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fcm dunarea galati.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rugby dinamo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rugby dinamo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Izida Cup

The article Izida Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This tournament is not notable by project standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Izida Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Izida Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izida Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jared Preston (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Un pisoi pentru dumneavoastră!

alexandrey (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sabina Lupu

The article Sabina Lupu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniëlle Harmsen

The article Daniëlle Harmsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vanda Lukács

The article Vanda Lukács has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kateřina Kramperová

The article Kateřina Kramperová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugeniya Pashkova

The article Eugeniya Pashkova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bogdan-Victor Leonte

The article Bogdan-Victor Leonte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per WP:NTENNIS. No atp main draw appearances, no Davis Cup, no challenger titles, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 18:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elora Dabija

The article Elora Dabija has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camelia Hristea

The article Camelia Hristea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karina Goia

The article Karina Goia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patricia Chirea

The article Patricia Chirea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexandra Damaschin

The article Alexandra Damaschin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bianca Hîncu

The article Bianca Hîncu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raluca Elena Platon

The article Raluca Elena Platon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 00:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cristina Stancu

The article Cristina Stancu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laura-Ioana Andrei

The article Laura-Ioana Andrei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diana Buzean

The article Diana Buzean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet project notability guidelines: Not played in WTA main draw or Fed Cup, not won an ITF tournament above $25K category, not a notable junior career, no claims at present she is generally notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexiulian25 (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Salut. sunt nou pe wikipedia. poti sa schimbi 1994 Supercupa României 1995 si 1998 asa cum ai editat tu celelalte editii ... si ediatia din 2014 trebuie dat undo .. cineva a sters... mai sunt cateva editii de modificat si va fii complet Supercupa României.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dennis Blömke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dennis Blömke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have seen you improved seasons or parts of articles in Cupa României and List of Cupa României finals. Would you like to help to improve other missing seasons? I already start with the first ones. Thank you!Alexiulian25 (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BRD Sibiu Challenger logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BRD Sibiu Challenger logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga I logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liga I logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liga I logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liga I logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vasile Lucaci

Pleas3e write this page or allow to remove the disaster.Xx236 (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (09:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC))

Nomination for deletion of Template:CS Otopeni squad

Template:CS Otopeni squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 13:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FC Unirea Alba Iulia squad

Template:FC Unirea Alba Iulia squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gabinho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BRD Năstase Ţiriac Trophy logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BRD Năstase Ţiriac Trophy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cosmin Rațiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Politehnica Iași. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandurii Târgu Jiu.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandurii Târgu Jiu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not create unreferenced or poorly referenced articles on living people (e.g. Georgia Crăciun) - I see you have been receiving warnings about this behaviour for several years. All blps need to be WP:INLINECITEd. I have moved it to Draft:Georgia Crăciun, where you can work on it until it is ready for the mainspace. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura-Ioana Andrei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura-Ioana Andrei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura-Ioana Andrei until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2000 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2000 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 20:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia Dețiuc

Could you please WP:INLINECITE WP:RELIABLESOURCES to this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox colours

Hi @Gabinho:, as you saw, I reverted your change on Template:CSA Steaua București rugby squad when you added in colours. There's a long-standing debate in WP:RU whether colours are allowed in rugby union navboxes; as for now, no consensus has been reached, so no colours are used in any rugby union navboxes... TheMightyPeanut (talk) 23:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I didn't knew. It's okay. I hope a pro colors consensus would be reached, though! (Gabinho^>:) 04:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

It gets discussed, then forgotten about, then raised again two years later, etc. I'm not sure it will happen anytime soon... TheMightyPeanut (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fc brasov.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fc brasov.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Caracal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Caracal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at CSA Steaua București (football). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Swarm ♠ 03:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gabinho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Have you at least checked my contributions on Wikipedia and Wikimedia? I edit for ten years now and I have not once started an edit war. I just reverted an edit that removed referenced content on Wikipedia. (I also referenced my reason of reverting) I don't think this is reason enough for me to get blocked. I understand Wikipedia and I read all the guidelines. I know when I am wrong and when I am not. Please remove this block. (Gabinho^>:) 09:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked, as per the discussion below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a long running edit war that was already dealt with by page protection, with the threat of blocks for anyone who continued it. It gave me no joy to sully your clean block log, but you took part in the edit war after all editors were warned on the talk page.Swarm ♠ 18:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please indicate where exactly is the block warning? In my case at least. Thank you(Gabinho^>:) 19:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@Swarm: I would be very grateful if you could clarify the reason for the block. As far as I can see the only edits that Gabinho has ever made at CSA Steaua București (football) are these three: [4], [5], and [6]. How does that constitute edit-warring? (And please note that it is necessary to show that this editor has been edit-warring in order to justify a block on this editor.) I am also puzzled by your remark about "all editors were warned on the talk page". It sort of reads as though you mean that you deem an editor to have been warned if there is a message hidden in the middle of an article talk page, even if there is no reason to suppose that the editor in question has ever looked at that talk page, but you can't really mean that, can you? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 01:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: Hi James. Be happy to clear up any confusion. So, this was a newly-created article, that, since its creation, has been plagued by a good faith content dispute, that has manifested itself via edit warring. The dispute is understandable. Basically, this football team was founded as part of the multi-sports club CSA Steaua București. They eventually separated from the parent club, but continued using the same name—Fotbal Club Steaua București. They claimed to be the same team. The afformentioned parent club took them to court years later, saying that they were unlawfully using their brand, and they were found in court to be illegitimate—in other words, they were retroactively found, by legal technicality, to be a completely different team than the original one. They were forced to change their name to their acronym, FCSB. Following this, CSA Steaua București reactivated their football club. So, we essentially now have two teams that go by the same name, both claiming to be the "real" one. So, naturally, editors are arguing over which Steaua "owns" the history, honors, and legacy. If you look at the article's history, you can see numerous editors edit warring over this singular issue, since the article's creation last month. This was addressed with page protection on October 1. An unequivocal warning was given on the article's talk page by the protecting admin. It's simply not realistic to suggest that this warning could not or would not be seen by editors who look at the talk page. It's not "hidden". There's barely any content on the talk page. Moreover, as you're no doubt aware, "not looking at the talk page" is not a mitigating factor for taking part in an edit war. It's the opposite. At the time of my block, there were three editors continuing the specific, singular, long-running edit war. Gabinho was one of those editors. Let me know if you have any further questions. Swarm ♠ 04:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Swarm: Sorry, but this block is wrong, and you have not really addressed JamesBWatson's points at all. Those three (2 perfectly innocent looking, and only 1 in the 'honours' dispute) edits do not amount to edit warring, and it is also wrong to consider an individual editor to have been warned if the warning is only on the article talk page. I agree that there has been disruption at this article and that it has been very frustrating, but this really is just an innocent victim here. Considering how little of the block is left to run, I'm going to unblock rather than waste more time arguing about it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you for handling this situation. (Gabinho^>:) 09:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@Swarm: You have made no attempt whatever to answer my question "How does that constitute edit-warring?" I even anticipated the possibility that you might be likely to avoid answering that question and instead give stuff about the general editing history of the article, by saying "And please note that it is necessary to show that this editor has been edit-warring in order to justify a block on this editor". I made a deliberate point of bolding the essential words this editor, and yet you still gave a long account of what the dispute was about and the history of edit-warring by other editors, and did not even mention Gabinho's editing, let alone explaining why three quite different edits, only two of which reverted anything by other editors, constituted edit warring.

You wrote "It's simply not realistic to suggest that this warning could not or would not be seen by editors who look at the talk page". Had you not noticed that I explicitly said "even if there is no reason to suppose that the editor in question has ever looked at that talk page"? Gabinho may have looked at the talk page before editing the article, or he may not: I don't know whether he did, and nor do you. Even if he had started edit-warring (which he didn't) you would have had no right to presume that he had read the message on the article talk page, and you should have warned him as a first step.

The main point of this is that it is not anywhere near remotely reasonable to block an editor for "edit warring" when he has not been edit warring, on the basis that other people have been edit warring and this editor's edits have some similarity to edits by those who have edit-warred. It was obvious to me as soon as I looked at his edits to the article that there had been no edit warring, but rather than unblock immediately I gave you a chance to explain why you thought that this editor had been edit warring. You made no attempt whatever to do so. If Boing! said Zebedee hadn't got there first I would certainly have unblocked once I had read your non-reply to my question. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gabinho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Gabinho|<font color="darkblue">G</font><font color="red">a</font><font color="darkblue">b</font><font color="red">i</font><font color="darkblue">n</font><font color="red">h</font><font color="darkblue">o</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gabinho|>:)]]</sup>

: Gabinho^>:)

to

[[User:Gabinho|<span style="color:darkblue">G<span style="color:red">a<span style="color:darkblue">b<span style="color:red">i</span>n</span>h</span>o</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gabinho|>:)]]</sup>

: Gabinho^>:)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis Explorer profile questionable

I think you should stop adding the "Tennis Explorer profile" betting website to every article. I will bring this up at Tennis project to see what other think about adding a betting website when we already have ATP/WTA/Davis Cup/Fed Cup/ITF templates at our disposal. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought it was useful. I was not thinking about bets. Only about player record. It is a very comprehensive site. Gabinho^>:) 10:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But is it really more expansive than the WTA/ITF/ATP sites? Fyunck(click) (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Take it to Tennis Project and if it stays it stays. If not, then let it go gracefully... Gabinho^>:) 11:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tennis Explorer profile

Template:Tennis Explorer profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wolbo (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you please add clear, WP:INLINECITED references to all articles you create, including Edris Fetisleam? 'External links' just means suggestions for further reading and doesn't indicate where you got the information from. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I added requested references. You can check it out now. Gabinho^>:) 18:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Daniel Plai) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Daniel Plai, Gabinho!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Felicitari!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gabinho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Marius Iftimiciuc

Hello, Gabinho,

Thanks for creating Marius Iftimiciuc! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The references on the page appear to be broken.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Hello. I checked and found no issues. Can you be more specific? Gabinho^>:) 14:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexandru Bucur has been accepted

Alexandru Bucur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Short notice

Hello Gabinho, I have noticed that you enjoy rugby and edit player pages and create. Unfortunately I am not as talented as you, so can you help me with the Wikipedia pages of Alexandru Țiglă, Dragoș Ser, Vlad Neculau, Iulian Hartig and the logo for ACS Tomitanii Constanta please. Thanks RomaniaRugbyFan

I saw you edit also and create articles. A good start is to read the Wikipedia Guidelines on creating new articles. Also, very important is to source an article created by placing references. You'll get used to it. I will check those articles you recommended and update them. Nice to hear that more and more wikipedians are interested in Rugby Union! Cheers and good luck! (Gabinho^>:) 18:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marian Drenceanu has been accepted

Marian Drenceanu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eagleash (talk) 23:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby

Salut daca ai timp actualizeaza articolele pe wikipedia deorece multi jucatori s-au retras din activitate. Am contribuit si eu dar nu pot sa fac totul singur.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian rugby union player articles

Hi there, firstly thank you for your edits and contributions to Romanian rugby on Wikipedia. However, having been alerted to a couple of player articles on uncapped players, I just wanted to let you know that unless a player plays internationally for Romania, they aren't notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia unless they pass notability guidelines or pass another section of WP:NRU (for example, playing in a league that is notable under WP:NRU). The Romanian league isn't listed as a notable league under current guidelines, so if a player has only played in the Romanian league and in no other competition or internationally, they do not qualify for an article unless WP:GNG can be passed. If you have any questions or believe that the Romanian league should potentially be added to WP:NRU, please do not hesitate to contact the Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union page where it can be discussed. Regards. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ciprian Lucaci for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ciprian Lucaci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciprian Lucaci until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dragoș Lucan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragoș Lucan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragoș Lucan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've userfied this to User:Gabinho/Dragoș Lucan. Please don't move it back to mainspace without addressing the concerns in the AfD. Hut 8.5 08:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cosmin Iliuță

The article Cosmin Iliuță has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, Rugby 7s appearances in a non notable competition, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about no sources on the player to suggest significant coverage, just routine coverage of matches he's played in.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marius Lungu

The article Marius Lungu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about no sources on the player to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laurențiu Nica

The article Laurențiu Nica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about no sources on the player to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cristian Pană

The article Cristian Pană has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nika Pataraia

The article Nika Pataraia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bogdan Doroftei

The article Bogdan Doroftei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about no sources on the player to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcel Rusu

The article Marcel Rusu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about no sources on the player to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mario Arvinte

The article Mario Arvinte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just some routine match reports and transaction reports on the player and not anything to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrei Pășălan

The article Andrei Pășălan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damian Strătilă

The article Damian Strătilă has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Tweddle

The article Matthew Tweddle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eseria Vueti

The article Eseria Vueti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports and an article over issues of eligibility on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cristian Bumbac

The article Cristian Bumbac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tudor Butnariu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tudor Butnariu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tudor Butnariu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julien Bartoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julien Bartoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien Bartoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florian Roșu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florian Roșu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian Roșu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Popoaia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Popoaia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Popoaia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rareș Ciudin

The article Rareș Ciudin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morisio-Cokanauto Elia

The article Morisio-Cokanauto Elia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eduard Bencea

The article Eduard Bencea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, while he did play 7s, they were not at a notable tournament. Also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexandru Porojan

The article Alexandru Porojan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, and while he did play 7s, they were not at notable tournaments. Also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marius Pantelimon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marius Pantelimon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marius Pantelimon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied

User:Gabinho/Ciprian Lucaci. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ilia Surguladze

The article Ilia Surguladze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marian Șoană

The article Marian Șoană has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrei Florescu

The article Andrei Florescu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player and a story about an arrest, but nothing to suggest significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikheil Archuashvili

The article Mikheil Archuashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ionuț Melecciu

The article Ionuț Melecciu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tuʻihakavalu Ika

The article Tuʻihakavalu Ika has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, while he has played 7s it was not in a notable tournament and Tongan appearances are for the A side so not notable either. Also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ʻOneʻone Patelesio

The article ʻOneʻone Patelesio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU as per itsrugby, while he has played 7s it was not in a notable tournament and appearance for Tonga were for the A side so also not notable. Also fails WP:GNG as a WP:BEFORE search brought about just routine match reports on the player (and the apparent correct spelling of his name Patelesio Oneone) to suggesting no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ionuț Melecciu

The article Ionuț Melecciu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly fails NRU and GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikheil Archuashvili

The article Mikheil Archuashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Popoaia

I have moved this article into your userspace tp User:Gabinho/Paul Popoaia per the result in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Popoaia. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian rugby union squad templates

Hi there. I've recently tidied up the naming of the 4 Romanian rugby union squad templates that exists: Template:CS Dinamo București rugby squad, Template:SCM Rugby Timișoara squad, Template:CSM Știința Baia Mare squad and Template:CSA Steaua București rugby squad. If you have the time can you try and tidy them up as they seem to be out of date or having incorrect links. Many thanks. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fc brasov.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fc brasov.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CSM Știința Baia Mare squad

Template:CSM Știința Baia Mare squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSASteaua.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSASteaua.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ACS Tomitanii Constanta Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ACS Tomitanii Constanta Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tudor Butnariu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tudor Butnariu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tudor Butnariu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Less Unless (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Top ten male doubles tennis players templates

A number of "Top ten male doubles tennis players" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Top ten male doubles tennis players templates. Nigej (talk) 08:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TR female profile

Template:TR female profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TR male profile

Template:TR male profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Letcord (talk) 21:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CS Gaz Metan Mediaș squad

Template:CS Gaz Metan Mediaș squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicolae Frunză

The article Nicolae Frunză has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet any criteria of WP:NTENNIS (Davis Cup item has been removed from the guideline a while ago) and I have been unable to find significant coverage of Frunza beyond match routine reports, PR announcements or passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BCR Open Romania Ladies logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BCR Open Romania Ladies logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TAROM Flight 3107 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAROM Flight 3107 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAROM Flight 3107 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolzer3k 20:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TAROM Flight 3107 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAROM Flight 3107 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAROM Flight 3107 (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolzer3k 20:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ekaterina Yashina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ekaterina Yashina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Yashina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shrug02 (talk) 21:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Romania squad – 1999 Rugby World Cup
Forwards	Bălan Brînză Chiriac Constantin (c) Corodeanu Demici Dima Drăguceanu Mavrodin Petrache Rotaru Septar Slușariuc Stan Tonița
Backs	Brezoianu Ciolacu Fugigi Gontineac Hîldan Iacob Lupu Mitu Sălăgeanu Săuan Sîrbu Solomie Tofan Vioreanu Vusec
Coach: Paraschiv

v t e Romania squad – 2003 Rugby World Cup
Forwards	Bălan Chiriac Corodeanu Florea Mavrodin Niculai Pantelimon Ion Petre Petrechei Popescu Socaciu Socol Tatu Toderașc Tonița Tudor Tudori
Backs	Andrei Brezoianu Dumbravă Ghioc Gontineac (c) Maftei Nicolae Podea Săuan Sîrbu Teodorescu Tofan Vioreanu Voicu
Coach: Charreyre

v t e Romania squad – 2007 Rugby World Cup
Forwards	B. Bălan P. Bălan Corodeanu Florea Ion Manta Mavrodin Petre Petrechei Popescu Rațiu Socol (c) Țincu Toderașc Tonița Tudori Ursache
Backs	Brezoianu Calafeteanu Ciuntu Dascălu Dimofte Dumbravă Dumitraș Fercu Gál Gontineac Nicolae Sîrbu Teodorescu Tofan Vlad Vlaicu
Coach: Santamans

v t e Romania squad – 2011 Rugby World Cup
Forwards	Burcea Carpo Dima Florea Ianuș Lazăr Macovei Nere Ion Petre (vc) Popârlan Rațiu Țincu (c) Tonița Ursache Zebega
Backs	Apostol Calafeteanu Cazan Ciuntu Dimofte Dumbravă Dumitraș Gál Gheară Lemnaru Nicolae Sîrbu Surugiu Vlaicu
Coach: Gontineac