User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

New user

Is there a place where I can ask questions? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Oooh Laa laah (talk • contribs) 05:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Notice

Hello Gogo Dodo. You might want to check this out: WP:AN/I#Personal attacks from User:Gogo Dodo. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  23:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Denied everything. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

BLP

You probably already saw this, which was started after this post. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

A question regarding some articles you deleted a while ago

Hi Gogo Dodo, there is a couple of articles on German rugby players you deleted just over 2 years ago. I've recreated two of them but wonder whether they still qualify for deletion. Can you let me know before I create the rest? Its the players on the following template:

{{Germany rugby union squad 1900 Summer Olympics}}

Thanks, Calistemon (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing it up. I'm amazed you can remember why this articles were deleted two years ago, thats quite a while! Calistemon (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh no, you destroyed my believe in the all-knowing admins! Live on Wikipedia will never be the same! Next you telling me, its not the bunny rabits that will put out easter eggs for me this morning but my wife! Well, thanks nevertheless. Calistemon (talk) 00:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Just testing

Yeah, sorry about that. I was just testing.--Ice Cooling15 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: Sockpuppet tag

Alright. I understand. Thanks for the help. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Emma macdonald-scott

Hi. I had just tagged the page for speedy deletion. I could not place a warning on the creator's talk page, as it has been deleted before I could see the history. What should I do?--^Nilotpal42 01:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks-^Nilotpal42 01:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Cheridiot

Hello Gogo Dodo! The page you just deleted has been recreated, with a db tag ironically enough. Just a heads up --Tommy (msg) 01:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Nothing new

I just came here to say that I removed an abusive message by an IP address. Anyway, Have a nice day. Minimac (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Possible sock of BrianTheVillain123

Hi! I noticed that a new user, BrianFairplay10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), has been making edits that resemble ones that BrianTheVillain made under his old account. Example: Bclrocks's edit and BrianFairplay's edit. Could be a coincidence, but the username also seems kind of suspicious too. I'd just thought I'd ask you what you thought before I opened a SPI or anything. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  13:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Too bad he couldn't wait another day or so for the block to expire. Thank you for blocking the sock and his main account. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  19:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar :)

Sole Survivor Barnstar For all your work helping out on Survivor articles, and for dealing with BrianTehVillain123, I hereby reward you the "Sole Survivor Barnstar". Enjoy! :) -- Meäghân  talk  01:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Bieberquake

Gogo Dodo, please take a look at this page and its history. I have left warnings on all relevant talk pages, but it's like herding cats. Yoroshiku Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Question about "The Serenaders" page deletion

Heya - I'm totally fine with our band page on "The Serenaders" being deleted, but I was wondering what we needed to do to be significant. I read the bylaws about proving we're "notable" but are there any ideas on how we do become notable? If we have a published piece of music? Reviews in publications? Any help would be greatly appreciated - I've been a big fan of wikipedia for years, making edits wherever I can find time to help, and I've always dreamed of having a band on there. I now have a successful and professional band so I'm looking to get us documented on here. Thanks!

Danny —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aranamo (talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from Jaunciaton

Why did you delete my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaunciaton (talk • contribs) 18:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC) STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaunciaton (talk • contribs) 18:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

sorry

I didnot know that i have no right to block or unblock,it was by mistake.BTW i block god of dreams,because it is very clear by edits of him and his sock account,same name and same edits.so i suggest you to block it or either do check user test,thank you--NothingImpossible (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from ColourMeAliix

hello

you deleted my page about my band which i was in the process of editing (my first article) could you please explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talk • contribs) 22:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

do you have any idea how long that took... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talk • contribs) 00:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

may i ask what these 'noteable requirements' are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talk • contribs) 00:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

i do say that those guidlines are ridiculous.. do you still have my article on file or has my work been for nothing.. just so you know its 1:29am were i am... ive been up for 2 hours working on this as its my first post ColourMeAliix (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from Vanripertest

hello, my preofessor has been testing us on the credibility of wikipedia. He asked that we try and post bogus post and then delete them in a few days. Is there a way to do this without causing harm to the website itself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talk • contribs) 01:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

SO HOW DO I POST A PAGE ON THIS NOW FOR MY CLASS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talk • contribs) 02:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

his name is van riper and thats why he gave us the title —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talk • contribs) 02:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Semi or full protection?

Hi Gogo Dodo. Did you mean to do this? Two registered editors, Badkneesbear and SouthBuffaloRules, plus one IP editor, 80.195.95.86, have been engaged in a content dispute. I have successfully persuaded the two registered users to begin discussing matters on the talk page but the IP won't say a word, just keeps reverting. I hope to facilitate some sort of an agreement to clean up the article and source it properly, and I was rather pleased to have gotten the two registered editors talking. I think that full protection is overkill at this time and might be counterproductive. Could we try semi and see if things work out? Thanks. Rivertorch (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I think I would prefer to leave it as full protection. I think the full protection is best as it prevents either side from making any edits and having the perception that the anonymous IP is in the wrong since they are locked out of editing while the registered users are not. Full protection implies a neutral stand on who is right or who is wrong. I noticed that you have been trying to mediate the issue. I'm glad that have and wish you the best with it. Hopefully the issue will be resolved soon. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for replying so quickly. My thought was that the two registered users' willingness to use the talk page justified extending AGF a little further to them, but I'll trust your judgment. Hopefully some proposed text can be drafted on the talk page over the next week. Rivertorch (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

It is very encouraging that the two registered users are willing to talk while the IP is only willing to make snarky comments. But like I said, it is a perception thing. I don't want to allow either side to feel that they have the upper hand since one party is locked out. Or have one party feel like they are wrong because they got locked out. Or vice verse with one party feeling they are right because they can edit, while the other can't. Hopefully something can be worked out soon. If a consensus is reached and you need an admin to edit it or release the protection, feel free to drop me a note (I'm not watching the article or talk page). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

My fault on the Bruce lee article

I think i need to update my browser. The strange numbers appeared only on the Chinese text.Goodman1145 (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

What the heck dude?

Why are you deleting my pages? They have nothing to do with you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by IWEWrestlingKev (talk • contribs)

Re: IWEWrestlingKev

I appreciate the heads up! WP:PW will be sure to keep an eye out for any future socks. Thank you. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 06:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I was made aware of a similar sock a few months ago promoting the very site this past sock was promoting. I'll have to look through the archives for the name though. Thanks anyway. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 06:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Easy find! I'll drop by to keep you posted in case I find anything. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 03:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Page Protection

Thank you for your recent revert of vandalism on the Dayton, Ohio article. This article has been a target of vandalism and silly edits of this kind for quite some time. I have listed the article for protection from such vandalism here Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. If there is any way that you may be able to help with watching the page for vandalism, or semi-protecting the article, that would be appriciated. Thanks. Texas141 (talk) 19:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply

If any user has a problem with me, my actions, or my edits on this site, then they are very, very free to open a Request for Comment about me. No further discussion about this matter is needed or wanted. Lefty101 (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from Gdeezy13

Hey, a BUNCH of people deleted my page even after i put up the "HOLDON" message. I even stated that my article was not yet finished. How do I retrieve my artice so I can finish it?

gdeezy13

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the message, It really helps —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreahmequal (talk • contribs) 06:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Stupid question about a deleted article's re-creation like Justin Munos

Hello, I noticed you deleted Justin Munos. When its editor re-created it, you deleted before I could re-tag it. On the editor's talkpage I noticed you gave it a Create2 warn. My question stems from the triangle used by the Speedy Delete pre-canned message (which can be seen above your warning). Whenever I see that triangle I interpret it as a level three type warn, i.e., Create3. However, I have noticed that some Page Patrollers will go down to Create1 on a re-creation. I think your warning is more appropriate. Am I missing the mark? --Morenooso (talk) 07:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Cool. While I have you online, could you please put this User talk:Ensoftware page on Watch? I am going to bed and put userpage warnings on two talkpages because it appears the user has two accounts and is editting the userpage cited. I don't know if I will be able to follow up on this tomorrow as I asked the user to reply on both talkpages with it intent. --Morenooso (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Response

I did not notice the "talk:" prefix at the top and thought it was an edit to the article. Thank you for reverting. Lefty101 (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, was trying to revert the vandalism!

Hi, I'm a new user of wiki, so was having a tough time trying to correct the vandalism. Good to see its been cleared up :) Have a nice day —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gooduser600018 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Mount Oral

Hello,

I am messaging you concerning the Mount Oral article you seem so fervent on deleting. I am unsure if my post on the talk page made it through or not, considering your incessant ban hammer swinging, but I gave many good reasons why that page should be granted time to prove itself. Just is case you didn't get them, I will give you some more indubitably good reasons. Yes, we know that most of the rumors on the original page aren't true, but neither are the ones about big foot, and yet he has a page! Mount Oral is an actual speed bump located at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, OK. We intended to get pictures uploaded to the article to prove it, but we didn't manage to do that in the 45 seconds of the articles life. Many incoming freshman have the unfortunate meeting with Mount Oral at least once in their early months, and so it is a widely talked about topic. Any car with a 9" or less clearance is doomed if it crosses paths with the mount. The rumors/stories were created by the men of Brigade, dorm: Wesley, floor: 7. There, it is common for random things to be discussed in "Alcove talks" (Wiki article coming soon. Or do I smell another ban hammer. Do you yell out "By the power of Odin, I smite thee!" when you swing that sucker? I can definitely see that... You do seem a bit ban happy...) Around 3 AM one fateful night, the topic switched to Mount Oral and the havoc it brings upon the local populous, and then thoughts on it's past. Crazy stories were created that night. Then, the stories spread throughout the rest of the floor. Then the dorm. Then half of the school. So while everyone knows that these stories are untrue, it's still a widely loved topic. Like Bigfoot. Or the Star Wars universe. Or Cthulhu. Anyway, Mount Oral is a very popular topic at Oral Roberts University. There's even a Facebook group about it for Heaven's sake! Plus, there was a disclaimer on the bottom of the page that clearly stated that most of the rumors have very little factual evidence. Thus, I think you should permit Mount Oral's page to be restored, until such a time that other credible sources may prove such an object still exists. As you can see, I think you should wait to swing Mjolnir until we can actually get an established list of contributors. So please, allow us to recreate the page, with a disclaimer, and we'll be very happy. We're not /b/. We're not here to lower credibility. We're here to write an article about something so popular, over forty thousand people know of its existence.

Once Again, Thanks Eschington Member of Brigade, 07, 09 Eschington (talk) 05:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

First, I would like to talk about Mount Oral. You said I need a third-party source. Would that be a book that references to it? Or a direct quote from the president of Oral Roberts University? Or every single student at the college calling it that ( A student body of 8,000)? What is the number of people that use or know of a term/landmark before it is allowed it's own article? I did not make up the name for Mount Oral, as it has been around since the 70's. The article contained factual information about the landmark that is almost as popular as the Praying Hands. (There is currently no wiki article about it, but I would be scared to start one as it would have a very short life.) The "Rumors" section was in there, referring to things that have been said about Mount Oral. If this violated the T&S in anyway, it can/will be removed for the sake of the article. While I am not able to instantaneously quote articles or guidelines in my defense as you are, I will argue it until the bitter end. And yes, I do know that doesn't have the cleanest sound to it, but, as the campus is Oral Roberts University, I think we can all guess that the name is purely clean in nature.

Second, I did not receive your return message until after the article was posted, so it was in no way intended as a rebellious act. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eschington (talk • contribs) 06:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I am not complaining. And I told you multiple times that I would strike the "facts" from the article, but you insist on merely reading what you wish, and not what I say. You say you're being lenient and responding to my joking comments seriously? How about my serious questions? What exactly do I NEED for reliable sources? I read the article, and am still slightly confused. It is indeed a landmark written about in a publication, but not in very many. I wasn't mocking or attempting in anyway to be an arrogant arse (well, slightly at first). I was asking serious questions that you refuse to answer. I am trying to have a serious conversation and ask legitimate questions, but you continuously return with sarcasm and a refusal to respond in a fashion that is helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eschington (talk • contribs) 07:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, it actually has. I know of at least two publications that refer to it at length. It might not be in the New York Times by any means, but it has been discussed in third-party articles.

As far as page length goes: It would be expounded upon. It is rather short now, but it would quickly be increased with pictures, information, etc.

Anyway, thanks for your speedy-responses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eschington (talk • contribs) 15:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

WHY WOULD YOU DO SUCH A THING?!?!?!

erm yeah why? that was a perfectly nice page it was grammatically correct and had no spelling mistakes

what you have done has saddened me to my core MY VERY CORE i hope you go home and reflect on the greif you have caused me and my family, and goodmonson

BYE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmyv1 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Using Wikipedia

Hello Gogo Dodo. I saw you were recently online (due to a recent block) and wanted to ask an experienced editor a bit about Wikipedia. First, I was just seeking feedback about my contributions. I like using Huggle a lot but was interested in seeking feedback on how I am doing as a contributor. I am just wondering because Wikipedia is a lot larger than I thought it was, especially because there are so many policies. Thanks for your help --Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 01:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request

This appears to be an unblock request, so I formatted it as such. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Ryan Brumberg

Not sure why you deleted my page on Ryan Brumberg. He's running for U.S. Congress this year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Promoteus (talk • contribs) 14:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from Heidikole

Hi,

I am trying to create a Wikapedia page

Not sure what I did wrong this time

I deleted all web links google links etc

Can I not describe a book on wikapedia?

Can I not give bio of an author on wikapedia

thanks for your reply as i'd like to get this done w/ out too much more hassle.

best,

heidi ~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heidikole (talk • contribs) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Bclrocks10 again

Wasn't there alread an SPI case filed for Bclrocks10? If not then this diff says that one may be needed. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 19:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

An IP user possible vandalism

Greetings!

I've noticed an IP user has been recently vandalising several articles (including your user-page) and files. Would you see to it? The IP is 216.130.71.111.

Regards Aregakn (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

which one?

which one —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.185.226.71 (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia admin vandalizing my page!

One of your admins (who also posts on Encyclopedia Dramatica and has multiple Wikipedia accounts) is defacing my talk page. Please revert the discussion he added. Peter.45g (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

There appears to be a misunderstanding. I believe that 45g is talking about me. I'm the Encyclopedia Dramatica user known as "JuniusThaddeus". Nevertheless, I'm not a sysop here, and I don't abuse multiple accounts. I created the User:JuniusThaddeus account in order to prevent impersonation. A troll stole my username and pretended to be me on Bulbapedia, so I have the right to protect myself from impersonation here as well. As seen here, I already marked User:JuniusThaddeus with Template:Doppelganger, so I'm not trying to deceive anyone. I've never used the JuniusThaddeus account to edit. If 45g believes that I'm abusing multiple accounts, then he ought to start a sockpuppetry investigation and provide evidence.

It should also be noted that 45g was the one who started the conservation on ED. If anything, 45g probably started the conservation in order to lure me into a trap. As seen here, I've never defaced 45g's talk page. He probably left you that message in order to get me banned.

It would probably be helpful for you to know 45g's motivation for targeting me and User:Snaisybelle. As seen on my talk page, 45g makes references to ED's "Grace Saunders" article. I believe that 45g is Grace Saunders. User:Snaisybelle is a contributor to the Grace Saunders article, and Grace has a grudge against her. I recommend that you read Snaisybelle's ED talk page. Grace left several messages for her there.

Can you also take a look at the vandalism done to User:Snaisybelle and User_talk:Snaisybelle, including the deleted revisions? On February 19, 2010, User:DMacks deleted User:Snaisybelle and User_Talk:Snaisybelle. On that same day, User:DMacks gave 45g a warning for vandalism. There may be a connection between User:45g and those vandals. You should look into that.

--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Although I would like to keep you out of this, User:45g has recently began harassing Snaisybelle on Wikipedia again. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: WP:ANI notice

Thanks for the help. Sorry for involving you in ED affairs. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#45g.2C_Michaeldsuarez.2C_and_Snaisybelle – In case, you're interested. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

BarzanPDK18

He's back again. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reply. It's now a daily occurrence. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Active Banana

I know that the article Pinoy Big Brother: Teen Clash 2010 is out of your league, but I want you to pay close attention to user Active Banana (talk · contribs), who seems to be doing a pseudo-edit war in the article. Mainly, he removes all contestant profiles from the article, citing what he thought is WP:OR and even using WP:BLP to justify for the removal of the sections. And he does them with putting his concerns first on the talk page. I don't know where he's from, but I'm sure that he is from the Philippines, where the show is aired. Furthermore, the profiles are taken up from both the official website and the show itself. We just can't provide third-party sources on those profiles for the moment, but that's for later. I know Active Banana had been lectured in being a deletionist in his talk page before, but I think he didn't take that reminder.

Also, he seems to stand his ground and seems to boisterous. This is why I don't want to deal with this guy directly. Instead I'm asking help from you admins for an impartial view. Can you please help me deal with this user. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 15:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Let me add to that - he even slapped me a rather uncalled-for uw-BLP warning! --Eaglestorm (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from Docfire2

excuse you why was that post deleted davis is to play in a nationwide event in 2010 this was a legit post —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docfire2 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

titleist is watching this kid so is oakley, bridgestone and few other small companies he holds 3 different course records and has a few am status wins —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docfire2 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

you need to re establish David A. Davis so i can finish what i had only started 4 minutes ago —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docfire2 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Right back at you.

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. I suggest protecting your userpage. =) - Zhang He (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Dain ba Enkh

The article did claim that the band is Mongolia's first hip hop band, and as such, it of course received coverage. So I'd claim that this article did have a claim to notablity (as had the recently deleted article on Nomin talst). Given the extreme rarity of background information even on Mongolian bands that EVERYBODY in Mongolia knows, it is hard to reinstall the article without very proper references. Had it not been deleted, earning it a right to be maintained would be easier. So this lighthearted deleting is basically destroying the availability of precious (underreferenced) information. But I guess there is little I can do about it. Would you be so kind as to restore the article to my user space? G Purevdorj (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed

Hi again. Thanks for deleting Talk:Turki Faisal Rasheed. Please also direct your attention to Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed, which has substantially the same content. Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ 05:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Turki Faisal Al Rasheed additional source & reference

Greetings!

First, I would like to apologize for deleting the tag to one of the photos @ Turki Faisal Al Rasheed article. It was a mistake to my part for deleting it when I edited or changed the additional copyright information of the photo. Secondly, I already added a additional reference and source for the Turki Faisal Al Rasheed article I posted. I'm a newbie to this wikipedia, and that I'm trying hard to follow all the rules, policies and guidelines that was noted to this article. I owe you one for helping me to improve the said article. More power to wikipedia.

Best Regards,

Carlo

Turki Faisal Al Rasheed 14:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfrasheed (talk • contribs)

BirdDogCat aka. Barzan

Haha! That random outburst and your response to it made me laugh! What a crazy guy. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 23:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Traxx Neutron

Hello - my name is mackenzie and I recently created my first wikipedia page. I was quite excited to have finally completed this process and am confused as to why you deleted it when i followed all of the guidelines and created a page about a legitimate celebrity. Please educate me on what to do to rectify the issue as I'd like to be able to successfully create/edit more wiki pages in the future.

(Macppp (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC))

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

=D

Guess who...? - Donald Duck (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm... Daffy, is that you? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Nope. Take a look at my userpage. - Donald Duck (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I figured it out pretty quick since you redirected your old name to this one andy your talk page still has your old signature. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

speedy delete: Megajoule

Hi there, I am writing you because of that: 00:52, April 27, 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "MEGAJOULE" ‎ (A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

I understand that this is a company, but what I dont understand is tat other companies for example Garrad Hassan exist on wikipedia, can you please explain me the difference. Also regarding WindieTM, which was deleted, it is the same as WindSim, just a more up to date version of a CFD code.

Thanks a lot, Katharina

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

thank you gogo. yes, i am working for MEGAJOULE, until now all this wikipedia is very new for me. i will have a look at the business faqs :) thanks a lot! Mesoscale2010 (talk) 11:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from BJRomanus69

You don't think the new president of Longwood University, Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, is a notable resident of Farmville, Virginia?

BJRomanus69 (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

hi i am wondering what i have to put to not have my page deleted

it keeps getting deleted. and i dont wont to violate any rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohcaladotcom (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up my talk page! -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 03:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

regarding mylifeisdesi.com

Hi,

I see that the page was tagged for speedy deletion. I was not done updating the page and I was going to add sources that would have made this page notable. Briefly, I will say that it has brought all people of south asian descent together without any political tension. It has unified them which is expressed in this article: http://getahead.rediff.com/report/2009/nov/05/life-lived-desi.htm . MLID has also been interviewed by the Associated Press: http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=9481398&page=3 . Therefore, there are many sources that signify that it is a real web blog that does bring a difference to the community. They donated more than $800 to Haiti during the earthquake relief and here is proof for that: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:pyWHltw6QcoJ:www.dailytargum.com/news/student-run-web-site-aids-haiti-relief-with-every-click-1.2158578+site:dailytargum.com+daily+targum+haiti&cd=37&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.

The concept of the page is similar to MyLifeIsAverage.com or FMyLife.com and they both have pages. I feel this is worth the same importance.

Please reconsider the deletion of the page.

Thank you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Uapak90 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Sotem

The page Sotem has been created again. The deletion logs say you already deleted it twice. Maybe you should ban the user this time? Cheers! WikiTome ^Talk 07:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Tom

Hello. My name is Tom and i am trying to make a page for Adelaide's fastest cricket bowler but you keep deleting my page. Please explain.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddster27 (talk • contribs)

Biographies are a very controversial subject on Wikipedia, and there are a lot of things to conform to. Look at the explanation Gogo Dodo gave, and then read the according article, which will explain how you can do the biography correctly. You should read WP:BLP WikiTome ^Talk 08:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Problem editor

Hi Gogo. I'm being repeatedly attacked by someone and you are the first admin that came to mind. User:Pylambert will not discuss anything, he's just attacking me over and over [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 13:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

On top of the attacks he keeps restoring rude warnings to my talk page after I've removed them. [18] [19] [20] [21]. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikitube

Wikitube deletion is a fine case of "wikipedia gestapoism." It was speedy deleted before I could even contest it -- I wrote it... looked away. Came back not even 10 min later I noticed I had mail. Went to add the contest notice... it was gone. So I re-added the wikitube entry with the the objection to speedy deleted. You used the fact that the other admin had deleted it as a way to get around my right to contest the speedy deletion... I just wanted to point out yet another case of "wikipedia gestapoism" and how small groups of admins working together can in essence "control" Wikipedia using this simple technigue. This is why professionals like myself don't even bother to waste our time writing articles on Wikipedia anymore. Your red deletion pen may be deleting stuff that might, if you actually stopped and thought for a second, might actually improve Wikipedia. Btw, I tweeted this comment from @EDUITorg H0riz0n (talk) 11:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Kanji Kitamura

This is one of remarkable person who exported koshre bagel to Japan which never happen and USDA is confirmed for his activity as well as Forbs and Crain's magagine Forbs said http://www.forbes.com/global/2000/1127/0324110a.html

Also his activities rated one of sucsess story at USDA.

No one tried before but he did it with high risk and end result he make the things happen.

He also well known person in Japan at economy organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foodfinder (talk • contribs) 13:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding and I will recreate according to your advise. Foodfinder —Preceding undated comment added 01:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC).

I am trying to create the page but unable to put in a inbox some article and same as picture if you could help me to finish up this section would be so much appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foodfinder (talkFoodfinder (talk) 05:19, 8 May 2010 (UTC) • contribs) 05:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I have added some article on User:Foodfinder/Kanji Kitamura and if it is Okay I would like to Upload this issue. I certainly add on more day by day. Also I would like to up load his picture and please kindly advise me how to upload his picture. Thank you Foodfinder (talk) 10:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for our help and I will also make a Japanese version as soon as I finish english page. Also I will adjust some article as what you suggested me. Thank you again.Foodfinder (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Survivor

Sorry about the trouble. I mistook the title of last week's episode with this week's episode. --Addict 2006 22:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

No worries. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

edit

WHY CAN"T I EDIT PAGES!!!!!!?????????

--Sunshine2525 (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-free content review

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg concerning a file page which you have recently edited, so you may like to take part. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Problem User

I'm guessing you did something to tick this guy off. Not sure what but I'm guessing it's a sockpuppet account from someone you banned or something. Just thought I'd give you a friendly heads up. --Non-Dropframe _talk 01:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Of course, he couldn't even spell your username right so I had a bit of a time finding you. Anyway, glad that's sorted out. --Non-Dropframe _talk 01:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

He kept calling you "Gogo Dogo" whom as you can see, doesn't exist. I'm not quite sure how I wound up finding you but I did. --Non-Dropframe _talk 01:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of File talk:Delamo concept.png

Hi there Gogo Dodo, I see you deleted File talk:Delamo concept.png. I'm here asking you to restore the talk page and revert the speedy deletion request made by Burpelson AFB (talk · contribs) thereafter, as the talk page consists of an archived discussion regarding the suitability of the file that was obviously deleted. These types of talk pages are exempt from G8. Regards. — ξ^xplicit 08:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

No. Just kidding. =) It is undeleted. If you had undeleted it yourself, I would have been fine with that. I don't run across these G8 exempted talk pages very often. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

If I had undeleted it, I'd be less motivated to point out this G8 exemption. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of these occasional cases, though. — ξ^xplicit 18:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Looking at the category, they are few and far between. Anyways, no worries. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Short-short story‎

Thanks for the note, I left a comment on the AfD site. De728631 (talk) 13:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Powlz.com

Powlz.com deletion, hello! this page is work in progress and was uploaded to see how it looked, please bare with it!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobhasnopens (talk • contribs) 14:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Message from Truthtruthtruthruth

I'm not vandalizing the page, I am telling the truth about a corporation which, among other things, abducted me and tortured me, as mentioned in a court case currently before a supreme court in a major country. The article in Vanity Fair mentions this sort of behaviour. For an editor of Wikipedia to protect what is perhaps the most evil organisation on earth is unconscionable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthtruthtruthruth (talk • contribs) 23:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Wesley Backer

why do you continue to edit the wesley backer page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.222.232 (talk) 23:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Your fun is now over. I have protected the article from recreation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing the Albania article. I was trying to figure it out, apparently I need to focus a bit more on what I'm doing. I'm not sure why I was having problems with that... :) Hi878 (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and you might want to go here. :) Hi878 (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, come on, did you have to remove the tag? That is the point of conquering. :) Anyways, you're welcome. I've managed to make messes too. :) Reply here, if you do. Hi878 (talk) 03:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

deleted attack page

Thanks for the heads up about "Ivo Josipović" and the attack page on me - I wonder what that was all about? I can't see that he/she/it did any other edits, so I'm clueless ... ah, well. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

GazzaB

GazzaB is an up and coming artist from Southend who is gaining a lot of respect for his rapping ability. I would like the page to have stayed while i developed it. Why did you remove it?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imasnowman1 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

You removed valid and appropriate links from the distributed social networking page

Why did you remove my additions to the distributed social networking page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyguerra (talk • contribs) 22:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Username block?

Do you think that User:Nvrpoops might be worth a username block? He'll eventually get blocked for creating stupid pages, but with a name like that we can probably circumvent that process. The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I see. Actually, I put up one of those tags, and I added "...someone should look at this user's name" in my summary. No problem!!! The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Which Geoffrey?

Please see Talk:Phonology#A tale of two Geoffreys. The new user's edits were correct; they were not vandalism. +Angr 19:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Interesting

FYI, Survivorfan44 is another 13 year old Survivor fan who just joined a few days ago. Seems strangely familiar. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Promo 2007

I wonder if it is valid to speedy redirect when the article would otherwise be CSD A9. In this case, I'm AFD'ing the band anyway. - UtherSRG (talk) 08:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC)    (Please reply on this page. I'll be watching it for a while.)

Since it's under an AfD and there hasn't been a whole lot of discussion, it is probably best to just leave it be for now and let the AfD run its course. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but in general? - UtherSRG (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)    (Please reply on this page. I'll be watching it for a while.)

Having a redirect seems reasonable to me, but that's just my opinion. I'd check with one of the music WikiProjects to see they have reached any consensus on such matters. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

It is the consensus to redir nn albums to the band. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)    (If you would like to continue this conversation, please do so here and let me know.)

hi unblock my page

dear Gogo Dodo

i have created my page in order to have a visibility in wikipedia, our website like many other companies have the right to have a page and definition on wikipedia, if the content is too much oriented towards ads, i can change it and make it more corporate,

thanks for unblocking my page

rgds,

nicolas zennaro —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.34.70.105 (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

You edited while logged out, so I don't know what company article you are referring to. However, the article was either deleted because your company did not meet the notability guidelines for companies for inclusion on Wikipedia or was purely promotional. Additionally, you have no "right" to post an article. I recommend that you read the Business' FAQ on posting articles about your company. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

North West Anaheim, California

Thanks for deleting the hoax article. --Stepheng3 (talk) 16:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do

Can you protect Dragon Ball: The Path to Power? Thank you. --Hello, I'm a Wikipedian! (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Ming Dynasty Online

Can I create "Ming Dynasty Online"? And how to avoid being deleted ? When can I create "Ming Dynasty Online"? Thanks a lot, please help me as soon as possible. Thank again ^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by CatLycoris (talk • contribs) 11:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Message from Iranica2010

Hello,

I'm not quite sure how I'm not following Citations rules. In most of the recent edits, I am simply updating dead links to the new correct ones. Encyclopaedia Iranica's website has changed and all the links to its old ones need to be updated.

Please let me know.

Iranica2010 (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Ali

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for fixing my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 21:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Civility Barnstar

		Civility Award
		I hereby award you a Civility Barnstar for not biting newbie Aeiouy75 as I was about to do. Yopienso (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Cookie from Gromoror

Gromoror has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

hi

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfletcher1234 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 20:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus Controversies deletion

Hello,

I recently noticed that you deleted an article I created earlier today, Miley Cyrus controversies, on grounds of "A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic".

It is my understanding that a similar article was recently created, and this was the reason for the deletion. However, after further reading of Wikipedia:CSD, it is implied that if the new article "expands upon, details or improves information", it might be eligible to remain here. I couldn't find any version of the other recently-created page to know how well it was written and what sources it used, so I can't compare my version and the 'dupe' one. In my opinion, the version I created had proper reliable sources and accurate information.

I'd appreciate it if you reconsider, or even perhaps let me know if the article would have been accepted if there wasn't a different article that was recently created (and deleted) about the same topic. If that's the case, I'm sure there's a way to solve it.

Thanks in advance for your help. CShephard (talk) 20:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

east coast boyz

why was this article deleated i plan on covering all of the easter surf gangs Bigoo80 (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Sunshine!

		Sunshine!
		Hello Gogo Dodo! Meaghan :) ≈ has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Meaghan :) ≈ 00:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of DJ Surge-N discography

I noticed you removed the CSD from DJ Surge-N discography because the musician's page exists, I just wanted to mention that the musician's page is currently listed on the AfD's and seems likely to be deleted due to lack of notoriety. It seems likely that, without a CSD, DJ Surge-N discography will have to go through the same AfD process in order to be deleted for the same reason the musician's page is likely to be deleted. I can understand waiting for the musician's page to be deleted first, but it seems this would be an example of WP:SNOW at that point. I've done some google searches on the musician myself and there isn't a single google news result. I realize your an admin, I just wanted to point out that it seems the deletion of this page is a forgone conclusion if/when the musician's page is deleted and wanted to bring that to your attention. ialsoagree (talk) 06:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Per your comments, I've readded the CSD as the musician's page was deleted by an admin and the AfD closed. Wanted to inform you in case you felt that was a problem. ialsoagree (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Deleted revision on my talk page

Hi, I've seen you removed vandalism from my talk page ([22]) and deleted the revision (for WP:DENY, I suppose). However I'm curious to know what was it about. Can I have it sent to me? Nothing important if you can't, I was just curious. Thanks! --Cyclopia^talk 18:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Marly Tomsen

Hi, you have deleted my contribution about Marly Tomsen , I should start with "Marly Tomsen is a Second Life avatar (online personality)" ? this is my first contribution I tried to do it well. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldfride (talk • contribs) 17:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Edric Zohar

I dont get why are deleting the post about Edric Zohar. The guy was there when M-System invented the flashdrive he introduced the flsh drive thru IBM to the US market —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolo Fredick (talk • contribs) 20:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

what type of reference you want for Edric Zohar. No he did not created the flashdrive but thanks to his work with IBM and M-System the flash drive was introduced to NA. is a story well known among IBM employees. I was just trying to help is my first article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolo Fredick (talk • contribs) 20:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I dont know if my last message went thru. His story was published by GLOBAL MEDIA IT magazine. I have a hard copy of the magazine. Is that good? I am writting a research paper entitled "How Flash Drive changed our lives" and I have a chapter about history and marketing

Paolo Fredick (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I cited and someone deleted again. Is always that hard to publish something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolo Fredick (talk • contribs) 21:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Empty, you say?

Your edit summary for this gave me a chuckle! --Auntof6 (talk) 07:28, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revert on my userpage. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for catching and fixing the damage! Eponymous (talk) 23:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Paolo Gregoletto

We were having harmless fun...Paolo asked for it on his twitter (@TriviumPaolo)

Paolo Gregoletto I want to ask you all a favor. Can you go to wikipedia and and find my profile. make up absurd things, I will check in the morning :)! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajfoster88 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Gogo Dogo

You're not Gogo Dogo: you're Gogo Dodo. I ddi think of you when I found that, but then I saw the spelling :-) Nyttend (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Please understand...

Sir, (Ma'am?) I completely understand that you have a job to do, and that you probably have no regard for the circumstances surrunding the creation of the page you just deleted. But please hear me out. The first thing I wish to state is that I can assure you that "Spencer Tiberius Hall" will in no way be disgruntled or upset about a Wikipedia page being constructed to make fun of his past failures. He would applaud it, in fact. He is my best friend, and it is our current life goal to jibe the other in the most potent way possible. We and our circle of friends use Wikipedia every day for various things, and to get him on your website that we respect so much (and since he just got me using our school's email network to send a certain picture to every single student and faculty member on campus) would hit harder than a herd of steroid-enhanced elephants. We would love it. If you could let this page stand, you would be fuelling the fire of our friendship. I cannot begin to describe to you the depth and thought put into this text; it refers to a great many inside jokes, making it much, much more valuable to a person who understands what the text means. Please, find it in your heart to allow this page to stand. You truly would be contributing to a great number of people's happiness. With regards, Peace High Peace High (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Gogo Dodo(talk)

Somebody has pronounced you an "awesome wikipedian" by writing about you here. --I dream of horses @ 07:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Another "article" created by a certain sockpuppet fan. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Really? Odd way to show affection. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

deletion of my page we have band

Hi, it's really a shame that i'm fighting for week to write an article about a band called "we have band". all you guys delete pages without even knowing the artists can you tell me the procedure to create a band page ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.145.69.174 (talk) 14:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

In order for an article about your band to remain on Wikipedia, the band must meet the notability guidelines for musical acts for inclusion on Wikipedia. For example, if the band has a charted single or album or been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works such as reviews in newspapers or magazines then the band may be notable enough for inclusion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

I deleted the article; do you know why the IP asked you? Nyttend (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Apparently, you have a fan: Leuma

See [23]. I added an uw-npa3 warning, since this user clearly knows what she or he is doing. Just a heads-up... Moocha (talk) 14:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Just clicked now - secondary account. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leuma1234. Moocha (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Your reason for deletion of Purple City Production is very questionable and apparently opinionated. The page Purple City Production was created with the guidelines taken into consideration and the significance of the company was stated in the article. I find other pages that are ridiculous by comparison in reference to information and the significance of it. Please provide more information other than a link to a page that obviously didn't help us in the first place.

Sincerely, PurpleCityCeo (talk) 21:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)PurpleCityCEO

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Hikaru Kato

As per your revert here, I'd point out that there isn't such a character as Hikaru Kato - its an utter fabrication. If the request for speedy delete was of thw wrong type, perhaps yo0u might suggest the correct one. I did mention that I am largely unfamiliar with delete templates. I'll revert the edit replacing the redirect. I'll wait for your discussion on the talk page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I have reverted your blanking of the redirect. Please do not do that again. I am sure that with the many Star Trek fans that there will eventually be somebody who will answer your question on the article talk page. If somebody does not answer the question, I recommend that you bring up the topic on Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek or if that doesn't work, then starting a new discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion would be the best way to have the redirect deleted. No speedy deletion categories would apply for the redirect to be deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

And I'd point out that simply reverting without discussion is a pretty crappy way to broker a civil discussion. Please discuss your changes. If it happens again, expect a visit to AN/I. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I was in the middle of writing my response when you left your "warning". If you feel that I was in error in any of my actions regarding this matter, feel free to bring it up on WP:ANI. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I counseled against positioning yourself into an edit war or 3RR situation without the requested benefit of discussion. It was a warning. if you revert again without disucssion, it'll come up as disruptive editing at AN/I. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but you are coming across like a tool. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You did it again and I reverted it again. Blanking is vandalism and it will be reverted. Do not do it again. If you want to take me to 3RR or WP:ANI. Feel free to do so. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Respectfully, the name is an utter fabrication. There is no citable reference for the term being used from any reputable, reliable and notable source. I don't need to check with the Star Trek page to check a source, Gogo. If you don't know what speedy delete template to use, that's okay - just say so. However, the redirect is likely a prank, and it shouldn't be in place.

And let's confine the discussion to this page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it is and maybe it isn't. I have no idea. But I will tell you again that WP:CSD#R2 does not apply nor does blanking the redirect the correct action. I told you what the correct actions are. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

And edit-warring seemed like your best course of action, right? The term isn't used anywhere, and should not be a redirect term. If you sought discussion or offered assistance instead of edit-warring (which is what I expect from any admin), you might actually find this process to go smoother. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I offered you assistance as I told you what you needed to do, but you appear to not be listening. I "edit warred" (your use of the term, not mine) because you blanked the redirect which you should not do. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, when I see false info being provided as a redirect, I am going to remove it. I at least offered discussion, which you failed to do until after you had initiated the edit-war. And you might want to revisit the definition of edit-warring if you are operating under a misapprehension of the term; you were most certainly doing precisely that. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I have stated this at ANI, but will do do here also. It is not an utter fabrication, it is the name of the character when Star Trek is broadcast in Japanese. A keeper, IMO. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 19:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

And I will reiterate: prove it with a reliable, cited source. Memory Alpha, cludged together from fan sources by fans cannot even cite it (and it often does just that). Find another, reliable, notable source. If you cannot, it cannot remain. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Also on ANI, but the Japanese Star Trek site[24] names him as Kato. —DoRD (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

And, you will note, they don't cite the foreign language webpage, either. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Notice of AN/I

I did warn you; clearly you felt that discussion prior to edit-warring wasn't needed. As promised, the AN/I complaint. Btw, are you subject to recall? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

No, I am not subject to recall. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

A shame, that. You handled this situation rather piss-poorly. Next time, step up and initiate discussion; its what an admin is expected to do. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Dakota Mascher

hi this is Dakota mascher agent/ manager and i was just contacting you because he has become more widely known and more people are trying to reserch him and i was wondering if we could make another page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staractor132 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Joey Pero

Hello, I am trying to create a page for Musician Joey Pero. I apologize that this page has not met the terms necessary to establish it. Could you provide me with some assistance as to what I can do to create this page. If you are unfamiliar with Joey, answers can be found at his web page http://joeypero.com/.

THank you,

Michael Simpson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Escontra4 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Xylosa -- deleted?

Why did you delete the Xylosa entry before we could comply to the other Admin's request to provide more data? Originally we had an article from 2007, but it wasn't available electronically. We finally found it and plan on using it as a source. Can we proceed? Susancohen4 (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

article submissions for Eclipse Awards

Hello and thank you for your recent feedback on our comments to Eclipse Award.

Several years ago we entered a description of our company and the work that we do - our company called Eclipse Awards is now in our 12th year of business. We realize that Wikipedia is not for promoting companies, however we are also very active in terms of sustainability and community building in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (where we are located). We would like to profile some of this information on Wikipedia as we believe we are making real social change in one of North America's most challenging communities.

However, there is also another event called the Eclipse Award - which is a horse racing award. They seem to have claimed this space on Wikipedia.

How can we enter any of our own information, not on their profile? Any assistance you provide would be appreciated! Thank you.

Toby Eclipse Awards —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyBrazil (talk • contribs) 21:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Apparently Biased and Arbitrary Deletion of Valuable Content

Gogo Dodo,

Please explain your reasons for deleting my entry of the online calculator Sooeet.com to the Wikipedia page entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators" [[25]], a Wikipedia page that compares several online calculators.

My addition to that page is simply another quite useful and very good online calculator, and my addition fits perfectly well within the topic of the page, which is a point by point comparison of online calculators.

Your deletion can be easily construed as blatant favoritism towards the other online calculators being compared on that Wikipedia page.

Therefore, I would ask that you kindly allow my addition to that page, or otherwise provide a very good reason why you have chosen to delete my entry.

Please post your reply on your own talk page so that all Wikipedia users and editors can read your reply to this post.

Thank you.

Andremoto (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I removed all of the links to the articles you added because you were spamming them to various articles such as [26][27][28]. I was not biased against your particular calculator an in fact, I question the entire list of Comparison of online calculators since none of them appear to have any specific article about them and therefore may not meet the notability criteria. I have opened a discussion on this matter on the talk page and you are welcome to join the discussion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

On second thought, since there is not clear criteria for inclusion on Comparison of online calculators, your listing was fine. However, what I said about you spamming via references in the other articles still stands. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Andremoto's reply

I wrote the following statement before your retraction posted above at 05:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC). Therefore, as you read the following statement, please note that the first half speaks to your deletions of my posts on the Wikipedia page entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators", which you already retracted in your post above, so I thank you for reconsidering that position. However, I noticed that you did not undo your deletions on that page. I prefer that you undo your own deletions, so that we do not revisit this topic again as a result of misunderstanding. Also, please reconsider your position on the Wikipedia page entitled "Miles Per Hour" [29]. The second half of the following statement speaks to that.

[This is the matter you retracted above] You claim that your deletion of my post of the online calculator Sooeet.com [[30]] on the Wikipedia page entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators" [[31]] was not biased. However, you did not delete any of the other online calculators that are also posted on that page, even though my post is materially the same as all the other posts on that page (i.e. a factual description and comparison of the features of a viable online calculator.) Therefore, by definition, you arbitrarily chose to delete my post, and to leave all the other similar posts active on the page. That is, again by definition, clear and profound bias on your part.

[I kindly ask that you retract this matter as well] You also mention that you chose to delete my post on the Wikipedia page entitled "Miles Per Hour" [32]. I am glad you mentioned it, because that is another clear case of bias on your part. In that case you deleted my external link but you did not delete another external link on the same page, that was added by another user, and which points to a different online calculator. Both external links are materially identical (i.e. they both point to external online calculators that are not part of the main article, and yet both online calculators are indeed pertinent to the topic of the article). However, you deleted mine and chose to leave the other external link active on the page.

If you are following Wikipedia publishing guidelines, you must do so fairly across the board, and apply those guidelines equally to all posts on the same page. You cannot casually delete some posts, while allowing other materially identical posts to remain on the page. Doing so, by definition, is arbitrary, unfair, and clearly biased. Therefore, again I ask that you kindly either (a) allow my posts, or (b) apply your guidelines equally to all posts. In the case of the two Wikipedia pages I mentioned, that means that you must either allow my posts, or remove all other similar posts in addition to removing my posts.

I cannot stress the importance of this issue enough. It speaks directly to the value of Wikipedia as an unbiased source of information. If editors, such as yourself, are allowed to make casual, arbitrary, unilateral, and highly biased judgments upon the Wikipedia content, then the entire value of Wikipedia as an impartial, and therefore trustworthy source of information, must be deeply questioned!

Please reply here so that your answer is visible to all users and editors on Wikipedia. Thank you. Andremoto (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Undo of your deletion, based upon your retraction

Since you kindly retracted your objection, and your deletion, of my post on the Wikipedia page entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators" [[33]], I took it upon myself to undo your deletion. I asked you about the undo (see above), and you have not replied, so I assume you have no objection with the undo. Andremoto (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Gogo, FYI, not only has Andremoto undid your change on Comparison of online calculators, but I have undone his change. My removal is based on Andremoto's decision to add the product to all three tables instead of the single most-appropriate one. Sooeet.com is, at last check, out of all three tables. —C.Fred (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I saw that. I put the entry back on a single table, though without the reference link spam, per my previous note. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I had thought I had undone the removal in Comparison of online calculators, but it appears to have slipped my mind while I was busy working on adding the various maintenance tags on the article. Your undo of my edit is fine, though another editor then subsequently undid your undo. I restored your entry in the table, but without the reference link spam per my previous note. My lack of response was not a lack of objection, but because I was not editing at the time. If you notice, I made no edits to Wikipedia during the hours after you left comments on my talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent changes to the Wikipedia page entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators"[[34]]

After my undo of your edits to this article as stated in my post above at 16:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC), I see that you made additional changes to that article. You allowed my entry of Sooeet.com in the "General-purpose calculators" section of the article, but you removed my reference link in that entry. Neither did you allow my entries of Sooeet.com in other sections of the article.

Again, I must point out that your new edits of my post are arbitrary and clearly biased. Please observe that there are several calculators in that article that have reference links, and that several calculators have been added to multiple sections of the article, for example: (1) Calc5, (2) web2.0calc, and (3) WolframAlpha. Those three calculators appear in multiple sections, and they all have reference links. However, you did not remove the multiple entries of those calculators, nor their reference links, but you chose to arbitrarily remove my entries and my reference links.

Consequently, by definition, you engaged once again in blatant and egregious bias when you edited my post, although you may have done so inadvertently. However, it must be a serious violation of Wikipedia rules to engage in repeated and egregious bias in editing, especially when that bias is directed at the posts of a particular user. Therefore, I ask you kindly once again: If you choose to apply a Wikipedia rule to my posts, please apply exactly the same rule to all other posts in the same article. In this case, to be fair and equitable in your editing, you should take one of the following actions: (a) Remove all multiple entries of all calculators that have multiple entries, and remove all reference links from all calculators, or (b) Allow multiple entries and reference links on all the calculators in the article.

Please reply here so that all users and editors can see your response. Thank you. Andremoto (talk) 18:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your examples are not applicable. Calc5, web2.0calc, and Wolfram Alpha are listed in two tables: General-purpose calculators and Graphing calculators because those three offer graphing capabilities. You, on the other hand, listed your website on two different tables. I happen to agree with the other editor above that listing the site three times was not appropriate. Instead of continuing this conversation here, I recommend that you bring up the issue of inclusion on the article talk page. If there is consensus among other editors that your calculator should be listed three times, then so be it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Discussion: Changes to the Wikipedia article entitled "Comparison of Online Calculators"[[35]], and the Matter of Ethics at Wikipedia: The Not-for-Profit Organization.

I prefer to continue our discussion here, as this matter concerns much more than the article "Comparison of Online Calculators". The matter also involves, much more importantly, the larger issues of (a) The ethical standards of editors at Wikipedia, and (b) Whether or not Wikipedia is an unbiased source of information, or rather has become the province of authoritarian and dictatorial editors.

The examples I gave are indeed relevant to the matter at hand, as I shall explain. The taxonomy[[36]] of the article is exceedingly clear. As the table of contents clearly indicates, there are two main categories: (1) General-purpose calculators, and (2) Special-purpose calculators. The second category has three subcategories. Sooeet.com clearly fits into both main categories, as do the other calculator examples I gave. Furthermore, Sooeet.com also clearly fits into subcategories 2.2. and 2.3.

That is why Sooeet.com should have entries in all of the tables where I initially posted it.

Whether or not the calculators in this article appear in more than one table should not be a matter of Wikipedia's "spam" policy, but rather a matter of the obvious taxonomy and original intent of the article, and of the particular functions and features of the calculators that appear in the article.

By arbitrarily excluding Sooeet.com from multiple tables, you are making an unfair and flawed judgment; a judgment which does not fit the taxonomy or the intent of the article. Furthermore, by arbitrarily excluding Sooeet.com from the reference links, a benefit that other calculators in the article clearly enjoy, you are making a second and similar error.

Therefore, I ask you kindly once again, that you allow my original post to this article, in its original form, with entries in the three tables where Sooeet.com clearly belongs according to the taxonomy and intent of the article, and including reference links, as do other calculators in the article.

Please reply here so that all users and editors can see your response. Thank you. Andremoto (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

There really isn't anything further to discuss. We disagree on if it should be included or not. Resolution will be through input by other interested editors , which will not likely to happen on my talk page. (Another editor did comment on the situation above, but that is an unusual situation). That is why I pointed you to the the article talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Message from 88.108.132.69

This is not a hoax this is a religion! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.132.69 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, you didn't say which "religion" you are referring to, but I suspect it is Keb(h)abione (Religion). Please see WP:HOAX. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Closedmouth

He is useing doppleganger accounts to vandalize pages and must be blocked WP:SOCK —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noobranoobra (talk • contribs) 18:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Club Seantae

I would like Club Seantae to be resubmitted because it does refer to a real person, it is a real organization and it is a valid source, that deserves a wiki page. Lots of people would enjoy reading and understanding the meaning behind Seantae, just please give it a chance it means well and Northern michigan loves it. So please allow club seantae to return. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stu399875 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Curpos and Teenly

Curps' death is just a rumor, but Teenly really died. You can check the talk page of his account, there's a discussion about his death due to leukemia. --Hrotovice (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

New Template

Hi, I noticed you use {{FA user topicon}} and wanted to let you know that {{DYK user topicon}} has recently been created, so that you can showcase your DYK credits in your topicon space as well. It works exactly the same way as {{FA user topicon}} Happy editing! ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 12:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't have any DYKs (doesn't seem all that likely either), but maybe some day... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Jason Gray

Sorry about the misunderstanding. Is there a way to create a page for me to work on in private before its ready to be publicly put up? I wanted to edit some stuff on the page, but didn't want to publish it right away. Is there an easy way to do that?

Thanks, Jake.Vonn (talk) 20:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't think you realised that what he was trying to do was copy-paste an existing article into his userspace to work on. I have told him he shouldn't do that, because of losing the edit history. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I did indeed not realize that. Thanks for following up on that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)