User talk:GujaratiGangster

April 2019

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hodal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nizil Shah. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chandap, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It is also seen you added the same information on multiple articles. The information might be important but should be covered in proper length and at proper place with reliable source and complete citation with page number (if from a book). So information can be verified as a true information. Nizil (talk) 07:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What Chandap ??? GujaratiGangster (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Information on Koli rebellion was removed due to above mentioned reason. Regards, Nizil (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What the fun?? I didn't made any edit in Chandap. You can check my edit history bro. GujaratiGangster (talk) 07:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Mistakenly messaged you in context of Talk:Baroda_State#Koli_Rebellion_Against_Baroda_State. The similar information was restored by you on Uparkot Fort article which was removed. The notice was in response to Uparkot Fort article but mistakenly linked Chandap. :D -Nizil (talk) 05:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok GujaratiGangster (talk) 10:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chuvalia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuvalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuvalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghadasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghadasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghadasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 18:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion templates on Chuvalia

Hello,

I have reverted your removal of an "Articles for Deletion" template on Chuvalia. AfD is a process by which the community discusses a page and decides whether to delete it. It is not permitted to remove that template until the discussion has concluded. You are welcome to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuvalia, however, please keep in mind that it is a discussion, not a vote. Arguments that aren't based in Wikipedia policy will likely have very little weight. In any event, do not remove that template until the discussion has concluded. ST47 (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ghadasi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello GujaratiGangster, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Koli Dance have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and Thnx Sister GujaratiGangster (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]