User talk:Gulshanravilahore

I have been blocked due to the action which I did on technical misunderstanding however I undertake to be more careful in furure.... It is requested to unblock my account. Gulshanravilahore (talk) 10:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions on how to appeal a block are available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Appealing_a_block. An unblock request posted on one's talk page is unlikely to be answered unless it's made using the {{unblock}} template. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 10:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gulshanravilahore, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Khawar Qureshi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Greyjoy^talk 06:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khawar Qureshi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khawar Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mcnairchambers.com/about-us/khawar-qureshi-qc/khawar-qureshi-qc-cv.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greyjoy^talk 06:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Junaid[edit]

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Junaid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Junaid. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Junaid[edit]

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Junaid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Muhammad Junaid, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Nyook ^✉ 12:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad Junaid, you may be blocked from editing. Nyook ^✉ 12:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Nyook ^✉ 12:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad Junaid. Nyook ^✉ 12:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wiki contributor, it would be pity to end up with a block on procedural grounds. Please read the info on the template and act accordingly. Thank you.--Nyook ^✉ 12:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Junaid[edit]

Please spare 24 hour time to make it according to Wikipedia criteria or system Gulshanravilahore (talk) 13:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Muhammad Junaid. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen 13:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salman Akram Raja[edit]

A tag has been placed on Salman Akram Raja, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Khawar Qureshi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 05:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalid Manzoor Butt[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khalid Manzoor Butt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from ps.gcu.edu.pk/faculty/khalid-butt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalid Manzoor Butt[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khalid Manzoor Butt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ps.gcu.edu.pk/faculty/khalid-butt/ and https://api.ithenticate.com/en_us/dv/0425?lang=en_us&o=60302625. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Akhtar Aly Kureshy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blablubbs (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Arazi Hasnal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Senior

Khalid Manzoor Butt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GCU

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khushbu Sundar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 07:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Khawar Qureshi, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Pakistanis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GCU

Syed Ali Zafar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to PTI

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hamid Khan (lawyer), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Junaid moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Muhammad Junaid, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to explain in more detail why I have draftified this article. On the face of it, if this person is a news anchor on a national TV network, he may be notable enough for us to have an article about him. However, your article contains only one reference, which is just a profile on what appears to be an unreliable website. We need reliable sources that give him substantial depth of coverage - you can read more about this at WP:GNG. I searched for sources online, but was not able to find any that would meet our requirements; perhaps you would be able to succeed where I failed though, so I decided to make it into a draft rather than nominate it for deletion. If you can find better sourcing, please feel free to move it back into article space. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... I will try to provide more sources to meet the requirements... Gulshanravilahore (talk) 08:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Salman Aslam Butt[edit]

Hello, Gulshanravilahore,

Thank you for creating Salman Aslam Butt.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 12:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Jerod Lycett (talk) 23:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khawar Qureshi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khawar Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.serlecourt.co.uk/our-people/profile/khawar-qureshi-qc and https://www.mcnairchambers.com/about-us/khawar-qureshi-qc. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jerod Lycett (talk) 23:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ijaz Hussain Batalvi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ijaz Hussain Batalvi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bakertheacre ^Chat/_{What I Baked} 06:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for disruptive editing and failure to WP:ENGAGE.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (help!) 22:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Muhammad Junaid Journalist[edit]

The page Muhammad Junaid Journalist has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Guy (help!) 22:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamid Shabbir Azar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamid Shabbir Azar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamid Shabbir Azar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 22:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gulshanravilahore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will be more careful in future Gulshanravilahore (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry no. You have shown absolutely no understanding as to the reason as to why you were blocked. Can you explain what caused your block and how your behaviour will be different moving forward? "I will be more careful" tells us nothing. Until you can adequately explain your understanding as to why you were blocked and how you intend to behave differently your block will remain in place. For clarity you can still edit article talk pages so perhaps starting there with some discussion with your fellow editors would be a good start. Glen 12:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ps, as JzG has already stated read and understand WP:ENGAGE Glen 12:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC) actually i am a new commer and don't have experience and even no idea of rules and what i did, is a technical miscalculation and misunderstanding which i regret and undertake to follow and abide rules with more responsibility and careful manners as i am learning and getting experience of a new system which is facinating and intellectually rich Gulshanravilahore (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a new commer and don't have experience and even no idea of rules and what i did, is a technical miscalculation and misunderstanding which i regret and undertake to follow and abide rules with more responsibility and careful manners as i am learning and getting experience of a new system which is facinating and intellectually rich Gulshanravilahore (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Gulshanravilahore (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gulshanravilahore, that's fine and it's okay to be new and make mistakes. You are welcome come back another unblock request, on this page following the instructions on the block notice. But as I mentioned you must identify that you have read the linked policies, explain specifically how you understand why you were blocked and how you will act going forward. So please take the time to read the comments above, the pages linked, and then explain your understanding of them accordingly. It won't be me that reviews your next unblock request so you'll have a fresh set of eyes on your situation. Good luck. Glen 18:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Akhtar Aly Kureshy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to National, International and WWF

List of Ravians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to GCU and Government College University

Syed Ali Zafar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to ICC and LCIA

Masood Chishti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Executive Committee

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akhtar Aly Kureshy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National, International and WWF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gulshanravilahore, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tayyab Hussain Rizvi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tayyab Hussain Rizvi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Azam Nazir Tarar moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Azam Nazir Tarar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abid Saqi[edit]

Hello, Gulshanravilahore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abid Saqi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tayyab Hussain Rizvi[edit]

Hello, Gulshanravilahore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tayyab Hussain Rizvi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Azam Nazir Tarar[edit]

Hello, Gulshanravilahore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Azam Nazir Tarar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]