User talk:Hawkedin
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Hawkedin! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jaellee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alphonso Davies have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --Jaellee (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Alphonso Davies, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have also added inappropriate or incorrect information/language at Tom Glover (soccer). Please follow WP:MOS, especially MOS:ENGVAR when editing. Anwegmann (talk) 23:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Oxford United F.C.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 23:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Says the guy doing the same thing, look in the mirror mate dipshit -- Hawkedin (talk) 23:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at User talk:GiantSnowman. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Hamtechperson 00:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- To make it clear, you can remove other people's comments on your own user talk page, but not other talk pages. Hamtechperson 00:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hamtechperson 00:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]Your recent editing history at Ibrox Stadium shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seasider53 (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Seasider53 (talk) 03:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)