User talk:Hidar.ayube

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jinan Wakil has been accepted

Jinan Wakil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 07:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your time ,I talked to the person in the article and it seems that the article name had a mistake and it is my fault the article name should be : Genan Wakil As what she told that this is her name on her passport . So I wish if you can edit it and thank you again for your time . Hidar.ayube (talk) 12:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Hidar, we need a reliable published source which gives this spelling as the best/correct spelling. All the sources in the article use "Jinan". Can you find articles that spell her name "Genan"? MurielMary (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi mr.Muriel yes there is a reliable published source for that here he is (dailymotion) : https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6hzn6i . Thank you for your time Hidar.ayube (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Aldi Brothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldi Brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldi Brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 03:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello thank you for your time for reviewing my article . I believe that my article is realiable and had a good independent sources But I made some spelling mistakes and This slightly changed the direction of the article and made it unacceptable, and I agree with that . But now I corrected some mistakes and added some reliable independent sources and I organized the article . So please give it another look and tell me if there is anything else to edit Thank you for your time again. Hidar.ayube (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

In addition, they have almost 43 million views on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHUjkwR5MZo-VjcGMrMOJzQ Hidar.ayube (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Do they have articles in other languages? If so, can you please post a link? Schwede66 17:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately there is no, because they are Arabs, they are only present in the Arab press But the sources are reliable and independent . A few days ago I published an article that had almost the same sources or newspapers and was accepted after it has been reviewed . Hidar.ayube (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I mean Wikipedia articles in other languages. Schwede66 20:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

No mr.Schwede they do not . Hidar.ayube (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Any help? Hidar.ayube (talk) 21:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

You asked for feedback via my talk page. I shall respond here to keep the conversation in one place, and because this is the more appropriate place to have this discussion. After all, this is feedback for you, so your talk page is the right place to give it. I shall be honest with you – given that English is obviously not your native tongue, I wonder why you solely edit Wikipedia in English? What is your motivation of writing in a language where you struggle so much? A possible result of that is that your articles are extremely short and not very valuable. Whether the articles even meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia is a related question. It is hard for a new editor to get their head around the multitude of rules and it certainly won't help having to read the rules in a language that you struggle with. One example is you asking in another post on this talk page whether BBC news is not considered a reliable source, where you appear to overlook that all the criteria need to be met, not just this one (BBC is of course a reliable source, but is the topic discussed in depth?). My frank advice is to write articles about these people in your native language. Develop those articles into something with substance. And once other editors have added their parts (all your article are missing defaultsort and categories), then you might want to consider translating your efforts into English. Get some experience on the Arabic Wikipedia first before you embark on English. Develop useful articles in Arabic so that there's something to translate.

Something else. Your photos that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons have three things in common. Firstly, they look rather professional. Secondly, they have been uploaded with a rather low resolution (and those two points usually don't go together). Thirdly, I can find these photos on social media or blog posts:

• Genan Wakil is in this December 2017 blog
• Aldi Brothers have your photo on their Facebook dated August 2019
• Mohamed Dalo posted your photo today on Facebook (no problem; he might have helped himself to your photo from the Wikipedia article)

Hence my question – are you sure that these are your photos? Have you taken them? If so, why do your subjects have those photos, too? And apart from Dalo, why have they had those photos for such a long time already? What is your relationship to these subjects? Are you aware of our conflict of interest guideline, and our paid-contribution disclosure policy? Schwede66 09:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Mr.Schwede English is not my first language but I can speak English and I know I'm not great in it ,in addition to that someone had told me that it is ok for grammer mistakes there is a lot of people that correcting these mistakes everyday , Second point, the people in these articles honestly I do not know them personaly and I do not communicate with them , some of them are comedian that I'm fan of them because of their great work and act and they have a lot of fans like Aldi Brothers , and some of them I really respect them for their hard work like Mohamed Dalo (you can read the article to know what I mean) , some of them give me inspiring and a lovely feeling when listen to their lovely nice words like Genan it is a writer that I'm one of her fans , so the answer of your question is no I do not know these people I just follow them and like their works . Third point about photos , yes some of my photos are uploaded in other places so excuse me if I miss that point . And thank you for you . Hidar.ayube (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

@Podzemnik: HNY to you. Regarding my concerns above, the user has since been blocked for sockpuppetry. The answers given were simply lies. The photo responses also don't stack up; they are most certainly taken from the various social media pages. Could you please have a look yourself, run those checks that may be available to you, and take the appropriate actions? Schwede66 08:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

@Schwede66: Sure I can have a look. All photos uploaded by the user are deleted now. Regards, Podzemnik (talk) 05:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Hidar.ayube, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Mohamed Dalo have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 🎆 Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your time ,

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hakaniyat has been accepted

Hakaniyat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your time .. the article does not show in google how to index it to google please ?thank you Hidar.ayube (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kousai orfahli, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Schwede66 20:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Hahaha, Kousai is my neighbor and he is a newbie . Hidar.ayube (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Proposed deletion of Mohamed Dalo

Hello, Hidar.ayube

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CatcherStorm and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Mohamed Dalo, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CatcherStorm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CatcherStorm ^talk 00:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Your article Genan Wakil

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Genan Wakil to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Sbbarker19 (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hakkaniyat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hakkaniyat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   05:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hidar.ayube (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello,I admit I was making a mistake but I really did not had the well-knowing about the rules but I assure you now I'm full aware about the rules here so please can you re-consider about my case and thank you

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you had two. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hidar.ayube (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello I admin I was making a mistake by creating multiple accounts but I was not aware about the rules, but now I'm full-aware about the guidelines and rules in Wikipedia so I think the block is no longer necessary because I understand that I have been blocked for the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts and creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions etc.. but now I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I promise to make useful contributions instead so please re-consider about my account and you can delete any other accounts that belongs to me . thank you

Decline reason:

Seeing as this is a sockpuppet, and not the master account, I am declining on procedural grounds only. If you wish to be unblocked, please request it on your original account. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Users are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests. please don't remove them agian. Tknifton (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Genan Wakil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genan Wakil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genan Wakil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marah Gh 90 (talk) 08:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)