User talk:Horticulturalist RJ

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Horticulturalist RJ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Capsicum cardenasii, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monsanto's Law[edit]

The article Monsanto's Law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be used in notable sources and is more of a WP:NEOLOGISM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingofaces43 (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monsanto's Law for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monsanto's Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsanto's Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: I saw a request for Monsanto's Law on the list of items for inclusion on the plant portal. It is the same as Moore's Law, but concerns biotechnology. That's all it is. It has been used to describe other things, which I tried to touch on, but didn't want to include much because those are incorrect uses. No worries if you take it down.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Horticulturalist RJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capsicum annuum var. conoides[edit]

Hi, thanks for writing this article! Quick question–is this the same thing as the facing heaven pepper, or is it something different? Blythwood (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Np. The facing heaven pepper is a variety of conoides. 'var conoides' after C. Annuum is like a subspecies. The 'Facing heaven' pepper is a variety popular in China like 'Double delight' is a variety of roses popular in North America.

Great, that's fine. I've marked it as reviewed. However, I think it could really benefit from having a link to the facing heaven pepper article and vice versa and having articles that link to it (at the moment nothing does). And possibly being renamed so Mill/Irish is in the article name, and some explanation of classification in the article text? Sorry for the concern–article organisation on biology topics on Wikipedia has often been complicated when you have two articles on nearly-but-not-quite the same thing written by different people at different times and they don't connect to one another. Blythwood (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the facing heaven page, and I was going to expand/ link them more earlier, but one of my dogs passed away as I was working on it. I'll work on it in the next week. I should have left it in the sandbox, but my head isn't exactly on straight at the moment. Thanks for reviewing it.

Nomination of Wolfenoot for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolfenoot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfenoot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]