User talk:Iainmf

We cannot accept copypasted materials, instead use your own words. SwisterTwister talk 18:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:New Celeste

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:New Celeste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://parkrecords.com/artists/new-celeste/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Celeste (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:WEASEL. Immediately there's "influential" and "highly regarded", both unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Celeste and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 18:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Iainmf, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 18:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:New Celeste has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Celeste. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Celeste (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Celeste and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 00:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:New Celeste has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Celeste. Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 01:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iainmf. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, Iainmf. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:New Celeste, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GreenMeansGo and Worldbruce I am simply trying to create a Wikipedia page about the band New Celeste which tells the long history of the band accurately and with numerous citations to support the article. I can't see how anyone else could write such a detailed article about the band, although if it ever goes online, no doubt other people will wish to make contributions. Perhaps I should have involved a third party in the creation of this article? It is certainly not being written for any commercial gain. I have been helped and advised in the course of writing this article very kindly by GreenMeansGo and would welcome his comments on your message Iainmf (talk) 10:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Worldbruce. For whatever it's worth, Iainmf has been forthcoming since their first posts at the Teahouse some months ago about their connection to the subject. That they have not made a formal blanket declaration is probably more my fault than theirs, since I darn well know better, and was concentrating a little too much on the state of the draft.

To Iainmf, yes, per WP:COI, and in the interest of full transparency, it's generally considered good from to make a blanket and persistent declaration, for example, on your user page (which can be created by clicking here, and using something like Template:UserboxCOI. If you would like, you may be more specific in a comment, to the effect of what your specific real-world connection is, and whether you are or are not being paid to edit currently, rather than simply having a strong personal connection. Hopefully this helps clear things up. And apologies to all for not explicitly clearing this up sooner, which I admittedly should have done. GMG ^talk 13:39, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GreenMeansGo and Worldbruce Thanks for the advice both of you. I have now placed a tag on my user page Iainmf, can you let me know if I've done it correctly? Iainmf (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. GMG ^talk 14:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Celeste has been accepted

New Celeste, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

>SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GreenMeansGo thanks a million for your help, it finally got accepted and is online at last! I shall carry on editing and improving it now it's finally online. A Happy New Year to you! Iainmf (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey no problem at all. I'm glad it all finally paid off! If you ever get bored, keep Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music in mind. I'm willing to bet there's quite a bit there that may interest you. GMG ^talk 02:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]