User talk:IanManka/Archive/14

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

Previous Archive | Topical Index | Next Archive

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 22 January 2007 and April 11 2007.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Clarify please

Hello...

To whom were you directing this comment (below)?

Kind regards, fizixx

User talk:76.211.11.227
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to International Bowl. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 20:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by fizixx (talk • contribs).

Vandalism reporting

Ian, thanks for the note. Won't notify them again! Flyguy649 05:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review archived

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/IanManka, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TestTemplatesSmall

Ian,

I don't see a replacement for Template:TestTemplatesSmall, which is designed to be concise, at WP:UTM. I accordingly reverted your posting of a deprecation notice. Is the problem with TestTemplatesSmall that it is out of date? Λυδαcιτγ 06:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I updated Template:TestTemplatesSmall (for use on the templates themselves), and also created a new Template:WarningsSmall (for use on other pages; contains "subst:" along with the template links) based on what was at WP:VAND. The latter is only being used at WP:VAND, though. Any ideas where else it would be useful? Λυδαcιτγ 22:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot offer

If you could do a bot that looked at the warning that an editor issued, and said it had been deprecated, that would be fantastic. It needs another week or so I feel before the major bugs are hammered out. But afterwards that'd be great. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 14:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIAV

I saw that. I went back to change it but it was gone. Planetary Chaos Talk to me 23:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Templates

Hey. decided to contact you as my admin-of-choice, after you advised me not to mention WP:AIV on a vandal's talk page. Got it and understood. Different issue, however: I've created a number of my own personal warning templates, which I feel offer a greater breadth of options to me, dependent upon the actions of the (potential) vandal. Right now, I save them in raw wiki form, but is there a way to create my own actual templates (utilizing {{template}} form) on a sub-page of mine, or would I actually have to make them public in order to use the {{template}} format? (I'll take my answer here.)Thanks. --LeyteWolfer 00:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you notice, I have the templates {{User talk:IanManka/Archive/Archivetop}}, which, by transclusion, produces the following if I type {{User talk:IanManka/Archive/Archivetop}}

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

Previous Archive | Topical Index | Next Archive

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between {{{datebegin}}} and {{{dateend}}}.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Also, note that each template needs to be placed on a new user sub-page. I'd be willing to help, but I'd like to know how you'd like to proceed. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the examples and (especially) the tip on being on their own subpages. Let me bump around a bit with this and I'll 'call' you if I need assistance. 'Preciate it! --LeyteWolfer 01:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've got a new one for ya: how do I put five tildes (to display just the date) into a template so that when I use the template, it doesn't use the static date displayed on the template page (i.e., of the date I made the template? If I use "Ignore wiki formatting,' then the tildes (only) always get copied over to the page and I still don't have the current date. Thanks. --LeyteWolfer 04:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! I figured it out. Thanks for the help. I've got my basic templates up & running, with more to follow. Again, thanks. --LeyteWolfer 19:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talk page

No problem, is it policy always to delete the talk page? I only ask because the deletion page gives an option to edit instead, and asks for a reason for deletion. If talk pages are always deleted, presumably it could be made automatic. jimfbleak 16:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flagicon usage on your user page

No problem, hope you don't mind me changing it! We're trying to change the underlying mechanism for how those templates work, and editing your user page removes several soon-to-be-obsoleted internal template calls. Andrwsc 06:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user 194.144.111.210

Could you ban this user from editing wikipedia? He keeps vandalising In Flames articles and other articles. --Dexter prog 20:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add missing information to a protected page (Virtual Reality)

Eric Howlett, a notable pioneer in the Virtual Reality field, is missing from the list in this overview article. This is an obvious omission. I am researching his life and career now, will post an article on him soon. He should also be on the list and linked from that to the article. Thank you.

rperlman 00:17, 31 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Like this one

Yeah, I already know that it's used as a deliberate example of a red link, like The weather in London and red link. Now for the latter two, attempting to click the "edit" link results in the same {{deletedpage}} message rather than the edit form; by contrast Like this one is still editable, and the subject of about a dozen speedies including two from the past month. As an example of a red link, I'm thinking it should be one of the protected titles (though, as a normal user I do not know how the protected-title feature works). --Stratadrake 18:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Researching this subject, it appears that "protected titles" is an extension of the newly added cascading page protection feature. It is already being used for the list of pages at Wikipedia:Protected titles, I'm just asking that it be used on the other article too. Okay, looks like the proper place to request it is at WP:PT and not the article itself. --Stratadrake 19:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility to vandals

My intent was to be terse as called for in same guidelines not insult the vandal. Good points on first link about vandal behavior. Perhaps using those words plays to their intent. Worth thinking about. HJ 05:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS If Wiki guidelines required a registration to edit, the vast majority of vandalism could be averted in the first place and that which wasn't could be isolated and users blocked efficiently. Despite best efforts of editors and admins....vandalism often goes unnoticed or vandal not warned or blocks ineffective due to multiple IP addresses. The result is a R rated or certainly potentially flawed encyclopedic reference. There is some much goodness in the Wiki concept, it's real shame to have so much of this ongoing vandalism throughout the articles.

Please read what I said originally. In no way did I intend to be "uncivil" and the word "nonsense" is actually used in the links you suggested I read. how about some consistency or better definition of what constitutes being "uncivil"? HJ 15:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1954 World cup

Ian My name is Stephen Kirwan.I am 17 and am from Ireland.I am doing a project on the conspiracy surrounding the 1954 World cup final.I read your comment on the page about the 1954 World cup final and was wondering do you know where I could find better information on the conspiracy of the 1954 world cup?If so my e-mail address is s_kirwan2@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.202.129.84 (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

(Responding here) The statement you saw on the talk page was removed from the article as being unsourced. I don't think the allegations are true, but perhaps Google could help you. Good luck with your project.

commons:User:IanManka

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:IanManka. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 09:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation needed for article by name Mudaliar

Hi IanManka,

I am a very avid reader of Wikipedia articles on Tamilnadu. (a state in India). I noticed that you helped resolve the edit wars in the article Gounder with a disambiguation page. The article Mudaliar is involved in repeated edit wars similar to the article Gounder. I believe it needs disambiguation page similar to article Gounder. Both these are surnames used by different groups in Tamilnadu. There is constant slandering occuring in the article Mudaliar.

I think it needs a simple disambiguation page on the lines of article Gounder so that different groups can use it as a starting page.

Hope you can use your expertise in this matter. Thank for your time and help.

Sriramwins 04:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG map of Ribbentrop-Molotov pact

I have just uploaded SVG version of image you requested. Could you verify its correctness (and possible replace previous version) please ? Image is available here [[1]]. Let me know if you need to change something. --Miko3k 11:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just found a problem which my image (legend was wrong) so I uploaded a new one [[2]] (I can't replace image because my account it too new). I have submitted a replace request to help desk at wikimedia commons too. --Miko3k 12:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggestions, I created an updated version. Could you look at it one more time to ensure it's all right (I'm not a historian so I relly can't tell:-)) --Miko3k 16:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 NFL Draft Order

Hi Ian, I noticed you changed the draft order back to having bands and saw your reason. Do you have a link to this new change? I must not have heard about the NFL doing this this year. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 7231g (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia:Transwiki log/Articles moved from here/commons.wikimedia

Hi, I noticed in Wikipedia:Transwiki log/Articles moved from here/commons.wikimedia that you had attempted to transwiki a bunch of articles with pictures to commons. It appears that most of these attempted transwikis did not work for some reason. [3] was supposed to have gone to [4] for example, but did not. Gallery of 1900 Galveston Hurricane images was supposed to have been transwikied, but as you can see at [5], it was deleted from commons for being empty, which means again the pictures were not sent. What happened? I am trying to clean up and archive the items on the transwiki log here, but I'm not sure what to do with these items since the transwiki procedure didn't appear to have worked. --Xyzzyplugh 21:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, ok, so you started the transwiki procedure on these articles, copied the articles over, but didn't copy the pictures that went along with them? The problem with that is that there is no system in place for anyone to finish the procedure. It would be like taking an article which is supposed to be moved to someone's user space, cutting and pasting half of it over, and then leaving it in place like that, figuring, "ok, good enough, maybe someone will come by and cut and paste the other half over some day". Realistically, no one is ever likely to finish transwikiing those articles, so it's best not to start the transwiki procedure unless you plan to copy over the entire thing. Not that this is any great crisis, though, we could remove transwikiing altogether and it would have little effect on wikipedia, I think. --Xyzzyplugh 05:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Resolving a conflict

I have read the pages about this on wikipedia and I have came to you because you seem to be a person who knows how wikipedia is supposed to work and are most likely 100% neutral on this matter. I am involved in a rather intense edit war with two other editors of the article Miriam Rivera. In the last days the user User:Jokestress has quite reasonably asked for the article to be backed up with more reliable sources. Well I found them and that seems to have placated her. She has acted in 100% reasonable way in all of this. The problem arises in that she has asked in the spirt of resolving the conflict we were having other people who are not 100% neutral it seems to comment on the matter. These being the user User:Longhair and the userUser:Alison in particular who have not bothered to justify anything that they have done. Longhiar being an admin seems to feel no need to discuss anything and I feel is abusing her powers. Is there anything you can do? --Hfarmer 03:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Hi

I was cleaning up WP:PM when I found an entry for merging MSN Messenger and Windows Live Messenger.

From the discussion on both talk pages, there did not seem to be consensus and you had closed the matter. I was just a little confused, was there no consensus, or was it clearly decided not to merge?

I couldn't exactly figure out, but I'd like to help in any way if I could. If there was no consensus, then I would like to re-open the discussion,since the Windows Live Messenger states at the top:For the old versions of this software called MSN Messenger, see MSN Messenger.

Any ideas about this?

Thanks xC | ☎ 09:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pages by themselves list each other as past and present versions of the same software, so I strongly believe they should be together. Then again, they are pretty big, so merging them together on one page would mean first making a giant and then splitting it up to make it less clunky. I would still support a merge, since that would mean identifying both of them together. However, at this point, you're right, there really is no need to haggle about this. If as and when there are substantial changes to either of the two articles, I'll try bringing it up. Thanks xC | ☎ 13:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

#wikipedia-en-admins

I confirm that I am the IanManka on IRC freenode.net If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BAO Team

Your thoughts regarding this article, this is already the 3rd nomination. Some people might be confused that warez, hacking and cracking groups are legible for wikipedia. I can't believe this is already the 3rd, does this mean that any article can be deleted for the sake of different POVs. Yunaffx 08:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry, other's POV not your POV. Yunaffx 22:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oley Valley High School

Hi, I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oley Valley High School. You quite rightly put this up for deletion since the article, at that time, professed no notability. However, I have substantially expanded it and included two events that made the mainstream media. I should be grateful if you would take another look at the article in the light of the improvements made. TerriersFan 23:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TerriersFan 00:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My green e

Thanks for alerting me to Esperanza's deletion. I was gone from wikipedia for a long time and only returned this past week, and had not got around to checking back up on Esperanza, but now that i see it's been decentralized, this will be my last signature with the e. Thanks again. --Evan S e eds (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved from Archive 14

You removed our University Photo which are taken personally by myself (uzawaung). I may not know copyright claim but my photo are own by me and i give free access to all. If you have time, i request sincerely to write to me how to post own photo for future. Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangon_Technological_University

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uzawaung (talk • contribs).

AfD

Jeez, I can't believe I did that! Thanks, Ian.--Cúchullain ^t/c 06:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of omnipotent fictional characters‎‎

Why did you delete List of omnipotent fictional characters‎. - Peregrine Fisher 06:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not a vote is why I ask. If it was a vote it would be an easy deletion. The delete voter's argument basically boiled down to omnipotent (mostly comic book) characters have been beaten in a fight by so and so, so they're not omnipotent, or other reasoning based on what they felt the word omnipotent means. The keep argument was basically that we're not here to pass judgement on what fictional omnipotence means, and every character on the page had a reference for their omnipotence or near omnipotence, which was the scope of the article. I think it should have been a no consensus keep, or straight keep. - Peregrine Fisher 07:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you feel the same way as the delete votes. It's the delete reasoning that fails OR, not referenced characters. It doesn't seem like "If there is room for judgment in trying to make a list that accurately fits the title, it's too subjective for encyclopedic entry." is accurate, when the judgement is by RS. There's lots of WP lists that rely on subjective judgement, just not our own. It seems like why "List of Strong Fictional Characters" wouldn't be encyclopedic is because it would be open ended, which this list was not. We have lots of lists about fictional characters with certain characteristics. It doesn't match "indiscriminate collection of information," either. It's title and references discriminate nicely. - Peregrine Fisher 07:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV notice

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fictional portrayals of psychopaths. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Otto4711 14:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Previous Archive | Topical Index | Next Archive

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

Current Talk Page