User talk:Idris.albadufi

Welcome!

Hello, Idris.albadufi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Antun Saadeh[edit]

Good day! I would just like to let you know that I reverted your deletion of some bibliographical texts. While I do feel that this section does need to be reworked (maybe you could work on this), deleting portions of this section is not the right way to go about doing this. If you would like to discuss this edit further, please drop me a line on my talk page or leave a message on the article's talk page. Thank you. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I would just like to let you know that I reverted another edit of yours that deleted some bibliographical texts, for the same reason that I did previously. The two edits actually made the same changes, and, as such, were deleted. Once again, if you would like to discuss this edit further, please drop me a line on my talk page or leave a message on the article's talk page. Thank you. My regards,

To Laurinavicius on Antun Saadeh[edit]

Hello. I don't understand why you have cancelled my last contribution in Antun Saadeh page. I agree with your first intervention, but the second time I think you have not read what I have changed. I’ve no ideological or political reasons for my contribution. Please don’t delete my comment from your page, as you have done with the latest. I put the same comment in my user page. Bye --Idris.albadufi (talk) 09:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New message at Laurinavicius' talk page[edit]

Hello, Idris.albadufi. You have new messages at Laurinavicius's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Juan Andrés (convert)[edit]

Please reference your articles. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 11:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan Andrés (convert)[edit]

The article Juan Andrés (convert) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability questioned some time ago and no reply.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Idris.albadufi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Idris.albadufi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve ViVii[edit]

Hello, Idris.albadufi,

Thanks for creating ViVii! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on ViVii, though it needs much more evidence of notability. I noticed that they have been profiled in a few magazines, and information from professional sources like that is needed in Wikipedia. If this issue is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mad Max, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Paiji Yoo[edit]

The article Sarah Paiji Yoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has many issues including notability concerns, missing references, and issues with stylization. Recommend that this be deleted or moved to a draft space before rewriting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kaisertalk (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Paiji Yoo[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarah Paiji Yoo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kaisertalk (talk) 23:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so the usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. If such sources exist and you want time to assemble a suitable article, I can restore the article to draft space or your user space, just ask. Wily D 07:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it at User:Idris.albadufi/Sarah Paiji Yoo Wily D 14:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernard DeVoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adlai Stevenson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dante Alighieri and the Divine Comedy in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhao Liang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Mokhiber[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Craig Mokhiber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?nr=2210&page=view&type=20000. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 21:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Philipbrick.

I agree that the words I used are taken from an official source . The reason why I didn't try to rephrase those words is that the personality has become highly contentious, due to his positions on the current conflict in Ghaza.

As you may have realized, this is not my first contribution in English or other languages. I will create the entry again, making sure that the words are mine.

Thank you for your prompt intervention though. Idris.albadufi (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Catherine of Siena into Holy Prepuce. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Diannaa. This is very informative and helpful. I was actually unsure whether it was fine to re-use quotes from other entries on Wikipedia. Attributing it to a single author might be problematic, given the nature of Wikipedia, but if copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution was enough as a disclosure, I will do that right away. Best, Idris.albadufi (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hartford Courant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Clark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

youTube reference[edit]

Such references are not informative for the readers and would be dead soon. So I will replace it, Egeymi (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Egeymi. I appreciate your comment. I am not sure what you mean by "dead soon" though. I personally doubt that the youtube channel of قناة الإخبارية is going to be removed anytime soon, or at least I don't see why it would be more relevant than a cnn account of the interview. Part of the readership of this page understands Arabic and quoting the original source seems to me a good practice. Thank you again Idris.albadufi (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because CNN gives the same video, and textual material can be translated by those who don't know Arabic like me. That's why I replaced YouTube reference. Also, please refrain from making comments about the material as you did. Best, Egeymi (talk) 17:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Egeymi, thank you again for engaging with my edits to the paragraph on Israel in Turki bin Faisal Al Saud.

I am not sure I agree with your understanding of quotes though. CNN is not the original source. The original source is a Saudi tv channel and the youtube website of that channel should be quoted because it is the original (proprietary) source.

However, I see your point as a non-Arabic speaker, and I agree with you that quoting the CNN reposting of the original video as well can be helpful to readers who are interested in a translation of the content.

Regarding your last point, I'm not sure I understand what you mean with "please refrain from making comments about the material as you did." I hope you are not reproaching me of doing something wrong. I believe that the sentence that you now removed was stating a reality, given Saudi's rapprochement to Israel prior to the October attack on Israel, and its current shift of public messaging on Palestine. But I would be interested in knowing if you have different information or understanding of more recent Saudi diplomatic views on Palestine. I would therefore ask you not to remove the sentence and instead to signal your disagreement in the discussion section of the entry. With much appreciation for your time Idris.albadufi (talk) 17:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here all unsourced subjective comments are removed because these are regarded as personal research. Hope you could get my point.Egeymi (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Egeymi. This is a very useful clarification on Wikipedia's policies. In future edits, I will make sure to include supporting sources. Idris.albadufi (talk) 18:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]