User talk:InSameer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

InSameer, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi InSameer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi InSameer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:50, Friday, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi InSameer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:56, Friday, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi InSameer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:07, Friday, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello InSameer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Indian Space Research Organisation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to RuPay has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DRDO AEW&CS, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tracking and Identification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Hi. I want to remind you that you have to summarise your contribution before publishing it. Keep this in mind while editing.--VaibhavafroTalk 08:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online[edit]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Special Forces of India. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Vaibhavafro💬 15:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Before my edit, AFSOD was already there as a separate heading. I only included re-edited AFSOD as main heading and brought PARA SF, MARCOS and Garud under it due to what i found in a separate Wikipedia page on Armed Forces Special Operations Division (AFSOD) where it clearly mentioned as it's three components while you mentioned that " All soldiers are not part of AFSOD". Kindly clarify and if it is indeed wrong then maybe the Wikipedia page on AFSOD also need some correction. — InSameer 19:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your edits are usually disruptive[edit]

You must learn how to properly edit. You are an extended confirmed user. Blatant addtion of WP:OR and rapid-fire disruption is discouraging to other editors. These edits of yours can serve as an example, although there are many more instances like this.— Vaibhavafro💬 16:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not to discourage you in any way. I strongly recommend you to read our policies on verifiability and editing style thoroughly. Best wishes,— Vaibhavafro💬 16:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm if Special Frontier Force (SFF) which also has a wikipedia page that says that it comes under RA&W is a special force or not? The term special force is mentioned in that wikipedia page. — InSameer 19:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes. You can add it if you use reliable sources. Please sign your comments by typing "~" four times. That's how you sign comments. Regards, — Vaibhavafro💬 03:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I have added it.— Vaibhavafro💬 06:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InSameer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My account InSameer (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC) has been permanently blocked due to editing multiple pages without logging into my user account. Since my unblock request is reviewed ones and proven insufficient by administrators. Please help me know what kind of proof do the administrators need from my end to unblock me. I can assure full cooperation in this regard.[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.