User talk:Izunna Okafor

February 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please leave the top part of the sandbox alone. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... I gat a mail that the recent edits i made was not constructively done, and thus is subject to removal. Please am sorry for violating the guideline or rule. What's the weak point? And please may you help to rectify and put it aright for me. Thanks

Izunna Okafor (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The reason you received a warning notification is because you ignored the "Please leave this line alone" code on the Wikipedia Sandbox. Please be more careful in the future when you are editing pages. Primefac (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Izunna Okafor/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Izunna Okafor, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced article

I noticed that you began to write an article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. I have undone your edit there, because that page helps editors to organise the "articles for creation" backlog. It is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest that you look at Wikipedia:Your first article and perhaps try again using the Article wizard. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Izunna Okafor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Izunna Okafor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Izunna Okafor. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. –Ammarpad (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Izunna Okafor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Ammarpad (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Izunna Okafor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://9jabooks.com/profile/484. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of National Light Newspaper

The article National Light Newspaper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, fails WP:GNG due to that fact making all claims of notability unsourced. May also fail WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 01:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Izunna Okafor/Sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Izunna Okafor/Sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Izunna Okafor/Sandbox

A tag has been placed on User talk:Izunna Okafor/Sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 08:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your contributed article, National Light Newspaper (newspaper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, National Light Newspaper (newspaper). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – National Light Newspaper. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at National Light Newspaper. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cabayi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Izunna Okafor

A tag has been placed on User:Izunna Okafor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. creffett (talk) 02:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Izunna Okafor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 02:55, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Izunna Okafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Izunna Okafor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You seem to misunderstand what this project is: it's an encyclopaedia! Among the many things that it is not are (a) a social media platform and (b) LinkedIn; it is not a suitable place for you to write about yourself or otherwise blow your own trumpet. You've been very persistent in your attempts to do that, but please understand that if you carry on much with much more of the same, you are likely to be stopped. Please choose some other topic to write about. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I, the user intended to improve the page Izunna Okafor with more contents and references beyond what it previously was, and consequently have it listed in the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians_with_articles. I intended to make it meet with the standard of the articles contained in the above list.

However, if this was not the right way it should have been done, I apologetically plead that more experienced editors do a consummate and neutral review of the page, and treat it appropriately by either improving it, and/or rightly adding it to the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians_with_articles as was initially intended by the user, if it is adjudged notable and verifiable; rather than speedily deleting it entirely. Thank you) --Izunna Okafor (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:National Light.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:National Light.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ofala Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ebenator Ozulogu

Hello, Izunna Okafor,

Thank you for creating Ebenator Ozulogu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please remove or rewrite the sentences you copied from another website.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Corrected

Hello, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง

Thanks for your suggestion. I have reviewed and addressed that.

You may have a look once more at it.Izunna Okafor (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock|I acknowledge my offence of wrongly using multiple accounts, which led to the blockage of both my account and IP Address. Please, I request to be given second chance by being unblocked, pledging not to go against the Wikipedia policies in any way again. I need to start editing and contributing to the Wikipedia as I was doing before. So, I humbly request to be unblocked to do these. Many articles, especially those that need to be punctuated with Igbo alphabets (using Igbo language editing keyboard), which, not all Wikipedia editor that have it. Whenever I attempt to edit, an error message would pop up, notifying me that I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia. I wrongly used multiple accounts. Please, forgive me for doing so, and give me this second chance. I like seeing the figure of my contributions to Wikipedia grow on daily basis, but ever since I was blocked, the figure has remained still and stagnant. Moreover, some of the (published) articles I created are now being deleted by fellow editors, because I no longer review, update or attach more sources (as required) to them, due of my inability to do so, as a result of the indefinite blocking. Please I need to start adding and editing more articles and contents, as I was doing before. A so, humbly appeal to be unblocked, having acknowledged my mistakes and taken the correction/discipline. Thank you. [[User:Izunna Okafor|Izunna Okafor]] ([[User talk:Izunna Okafor#top|talk]]) 07:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)}}. {{unblock|I acknowledge my offence of wrongly using multiple accounts, which led to the blockage of both my account and IP Address. Please, I request to be given second chance by being unblocked, pledging not to go against the Wikipedia policies in any way again. I need to start editing and contributing to the Wikipedia as I was doing before. So, I humbly request to be unblocked to do these. Many articles, especially those that need to be punctuated with Igbo alphabets (using Igbo language editing keyboard), which, not all Wikipedia editor that have it. Whenever I attempt to edit, an error message would pop up, notifying me that I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia. I wrongly used multiple accounts. Please, forgive me for doing so, and give me this second chance. I like seeing the figure of my contributions to Wikipedia grow on daily basis, but ever since I was blocked, the figure has remained still and stagnant. Moreover, some of the (published) articles I created are now being deleted by fellow editors, because I no longer review, update or attach more sources (as required) to them, due of my inability to do so, as a result of the indefinite blocking. Please I need to start adding and editing more articles and contents, as I was doing before. A so, humbly appeal to be unblocked, having acknowledged my mistakes and taken the correction/discipline. Thank you. [[User:Izunna Okafor|Izunna Okafor]] ([[User talk:Izunna Okafor#top|talk]]) 07:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)}}.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I ought to have updated the article with more sources/references since last year, but I was blocked from editing Wikipedia,for sockpuppetry. And since then I have not been able to edit Wikipedia.

So I am currently worried and confused because I don't know how I can update/add more sources (as required) to the said article, as I can no longer edit Wikipedia. So, what do I do now? Izunna Okafor (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I ought to have updated the article with more sources/references since last year, but I was blocked from editing Wikipedia,for sockpuppetry. And since then I have not been able to edit Wikipedia.

So I am worried and confused now because I don't know how to update/add more sources (as required) to the said article, as I can no longer edit Wikipedia. So what do I do now? Izunna Okafor (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I ought to have updated the article with more sources/references since last year, but I was blocked from editing Wikipedia,for sockpuppetry. And since then I have not been able to edit Wikipedia.

So I am currently worried and confused because I don't know how I can update/add more sources (as required) to the said article, as I can no longer edit Wikipedia. So, what do I do now?Izunna Okafor (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

National Light moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Light, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 22:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Izunna Okafor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I acknowledge my offence of wrongly using multiple accounts, which led to the blockage of both my account and IP Address. Please, I request to be given second chance by being unblocked, pledging not to go against the Wikipedia policies in any way again. I need to start editing and contributing to the Wikipedia as I was doing before. So, I humbly request to be unblocked to do these.

Many articles, especially those that need to be punctuated with Igbo alphabets (using Igbo language editing keyboard), which, not all Wikipedia editor that have it.

Whenever I attempt to edit, an error message would pop up, notifying me that I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I wrongly used multiple accounts. Please, forgive me for doing so, and give me this second chance. I like seeing the figure of my contributions to Wikipedia grow on daily basis, but ever since I was blocked, the figure has remained still and stagnant.

Moreover, some of the (published) articles I created are now being deleted by fellow editors, because I no longer review, update or attach more sources (as required) to them, due of my inability to do so, as a result of the indefinite blocking.

Please I need to start adding and editing more articles and contents, as I was doing before. A so, humbly appeal to be unblocked, having acknowledged my mistakes and taken the correction/discipline. Thank you. Izunna Okafor (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your only pathway back to being unblocked is the Standard Offer; no edits or socking for six months. Doing this will start to show that you can respect Wikipedia guidelines and policies. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Orphaned non-free image File:National Light.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Light.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:National Light

Hello, Izunna Okafor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Light".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)