User talk:Jeffmatt

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Jeffmatt, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

• some General guidance.
• Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
• Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
• Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
• Use the Show preview button
• Provide an Edit summary
• Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
• Take a look at Consensus of standards
• Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, -- Alf ^melmac 10:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Counterpoint in songs, etc

Hey buddy! Nice article on Eje, there. I added some categories and such, but I didn't know about him. Now I do. It was no problem, by the way, helping out your page on Play a Simple Melody. As for that category thing, I'm going to do it sometime soon if nobody beats me to it, I promise. I'll talk to you later! --ParkerHiggins 20:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Musical markup

In response to your question on my talk page, I've never entered any musical score, and I'm not familiar with Lilypond. However, your solution seems to make sense; as long as you end up with a PNG or a jpg, and it looks alright, it ought to be fine, yeah? Seems good to me. Send me a message when you have something posted, I'd like to see how it worked. --ParkerHiggins | Talk 07:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Salvatore di Giacomo

You article has interesting and a lot new information. However, although you have made notation that you wrote the article, that is not sufficient to establish copyright. Go here to see the correct procedure under Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia. I'll give you some time to do this before I tag it for copyright violation.--Esprit15d 17:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Virgil's Tomb

Greetings. You have actually complimented the wrong person - I did not write the article on Virgil's tomb, which was contributed by an unsigned in editor. All I did was disambiguate a reference. john k 05:18, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Molella

The article Molella has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. howcheng {chat} 20:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on my page. For articles about people and especially music acts, we do ask that they meet certain criteria for inclusion, specifically see WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. If he's really a prominent DJ/producer, you could list some of the acts he has produced (it would help if those acts had charted some singles/albums), for example. Italy, huh? I've never been but my wife says it's beautiful. I've traveled a lot around Asia, but not Europe. Regards, howcheng {chat} 17:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Your recent image submission: Image:Ravellofest01.jpg

I noticed the image you recently uploaded does not have any license information associated with it. If none is added, the image could possibly be deleted. Since the image was created yourself, I recommend adding one of the templates at Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators to the image page Image:Ravellofest01.jpg. -- Anguis 06:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

That also applies to Image:Sancarlo05.jpg. Nice photos, by the way. --Anguis 06:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy

I've just started a new job, so I have little time. Music of Italy looks quite good -- I might have time to do a closer review this weekend, but I suggest you start a peer review so it can get some other eyes. Tuf-Kat 01:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

OK. I don't know how to do that since I've just started this Wikipedia stuff. I assume you mean External Peer Review and not Article Assessment.Jeffmatt 07:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Just make a page at Wikipedia:Peer review/Music of Italy/archive2 formatted the same as, for example, Wikipedia:Peer review/Universal pragmatics/archive1, and then add it to the top of the list at Wikipedia:Peer review. Tuf-Kat 12:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Refs at Music of Ancient Greece

My bad about the two ulrich thing. Since the name of the refs were identical, I though they were the same note. You want to make sure, when using the ref/notes system, that all pairs are distinct and with different names to avoid issues with linking (clicking on the second ulrich refin your original version linked to the note in the first paragraph). The a/b/c system allows for multiple identical references, something that templates make awfully hard to do.

I've fixed the note now. Circeus 18:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy infobox

Well, I though there was no reason to cut the link you had originally made. However,itwould probably make more sense as a "List" entry in the festival section. You might also want to cross-check that list with the festivals listed for Italy at List of music festivals. Circeus 13:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

For Ancient Greek music, I'd probably go with {{greekmusic}}, no need for overdoing it. You migh consider creating a generic footer/article series template for all Ancient musics, though (stuff like Ottoman music, Chinese classical music... and so on), or maybe eve a long "History of music" one. Dunno, really. Circeus 15:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Ancient music deletion

I removed the ancient music template from the prehistoric music article as prehistoric music is not ancient music but what was before ancient music. Thus I also removed prehistoric music from the ancient music template. However, a better alternative may be to indicate that before ancient music was prehistoric music and after was early music. Hyacinth 10:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Music of Calabria

Yeah, you mean... you don't get paid?

I was joking, man. I was adding the stub templates and I figured I should write a short intro instead of unformatted bit about it being in progress... all wikipedia articles are in progress... so, it's better not to write that. Sorry if I annoyed. :( gren グレン 06:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Map

I won't blame you at all. the {{Qif}} conditional I used can be a nightmare to use. Circeus 13:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Music of Emilia(-)Romagna

I asked User:TUF-KAT to fix the small mess you made by creating bot Music of Emilia-Romagna and Music of Emilia Romagna. Just to let you know. Circeus 00:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Baynap02.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Baynap02.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Jeffmatt, it does not matter where you put the image without copyright information. All the images should have their licenses according to wikipedia policy. Important thing is Wikipedia wants to collaborate the work as most as can do. It will be very shameful to me if I am obsessed with wikipedia. Please release a copyright information which is suitable to you and policy. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 16:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Superstore1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Superstore1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 23:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I noticed this and took the liberty of tagging it with {{GFDL-self}}. Feel free to change/confirm it. Circeus 00:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, actually, it seems to be a forgotten duplicate of Image:Superstore01.jpg. Youmight want to ask an admin to speedy it. Circeus 00:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I have nominated it for deletion, as it's obviously not needed. Circeus 17:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Comic Opera

Thanks for your message. The comic opera article has turned out nicely, and your excellent start was extremely helpful. Marc Shepherd 12:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy

Good to see you back! Music of Italy is looking very nice, - I think the main thing it really needs is some copyediting, as some of it doesn't have a very encyclopedic tone. I've got some stuff I think I'd like to add/revise, but it might be a little while before I have access to the reference. A few issues you may be able to fix with (relative) ease: the lead section is too short, the "folk instruments" section should not use bulletpoint lists, and a shortage of citations for certain parts (generally, each paragraph should have at least one citation). Tuf-Kat 00:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy, continued

You're welcome: by the way, nice job on that article. That reminds me, I've been intending to add a bit to the pre-1600 section if I ever get back to writing instead of vandal patrolling ... Antandrus (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

At Jeffmatt's request, I've expanded the Timeline of trends in Italian music, seriously expanding the early, medieval, and Renaissance sections, and adding a few tidbits to the early baroque. I'll try to parlay my notes into some expanded material for the Music of Italy article itself. I'm not sure how much detail is appropriate for this article; let me know if it's too much (or, less likely, too little). Peirigill 01:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad my additions to the Italian music timeline were useful! I'm trying to convert it to more of a narrative form for the Music of Italy right now. Peirigill 06:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've expanded Music of Italy through the early baroque. Let me know what you think! Peirigill 09:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy, continued, continued

Oops! Forgot about Hiley. I've added him in. The cite template is easy; just copy and paste one of the existing citations, starting with the *{{ and ending with the }}, and just replace the original data with the data from your new source.

Let me explain the situation with the links on "madrigal." Someone had already created a disambiguation page for madrigal, including a link to the 16th-century madrigal and another (red) link to the trecento madrigal. Normally I would use the direct link to the correct page and avoid the disambiguation page altogether, like I do with popes and kings. In this case, the first reference to "madrigal" was a mention of how Dante's championing of the vernacular helped promote later Italian genres in the vernacular... including both the trecento madrigal and the 16-century madrigal. Here, the ambiguity is real and even desirable, so I left the link going simply to the disambiguation page. Later, when I was talking about the trecento madrigal, I used the direct link that the disambiguation page itself points to. As you've seen, that page doesn't yet exist, but it should, so I'm content to leave a red link. It's a page that needs to be written, and the red link is a reminder to do that. It's also a reminder that the two kinds of "madrigal" are very different beasts, which shouldn't be lumped together just because they have the same name.

At this point, the article is too lopsided in favor of the early periods. There's probably some material there that could be tightened or omitted; as Blaise Pascal once wrote, I'm sorry this letter is so long, but I didn't have time to make it short.  ;?) Even more important to creating balance, though, would be for someone who knows the material to expand the sections from the baroque onwards. Peirigill 18:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Images for (early) Music of Italy

I'm not creating links, so I don't clog up your talk page, but take a look at these: Well, there's a picture of Guido d'Arezzo: Image:Guido dArezzogrises20060526.jpg and one of the Guidonian hand, which I'd recommend: Image:Guidonian hand.jpg

for the trecento, here's a picture of Landini: Image:Landini.jpg and a sample (in modern notation) of the Landini cadence: Image:Landini-cadenza.PNG

Here's Gesualdo's cheerful mug: Image:Gesualdo2.jpg I'm sure there are other Renaissance composers' portraits to be found on Wikicommons.

Here's a pretty Italian harpsichord - dated 1677, so a little after my period, but a great image nonetheless: Image:Clavecin italien.jpg

Hope that helps! Peirigill 10:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy

Hey, thanks for your help on the terminology page. I just made various changes to the popular music sections on music of Italy. I think three main things still need to be done to make that article ready for FAC.

1. Create a section for musicology, historiography and the like. (Music of the United States has one, as an example)
2. Upload sound samples (which I can make a good start on without difficulty)
3. Move the very nice history section to its own article. Some of the most important stuff from there ought to be incorporated into the classical section. I think the history section should be moved because it is very long (and the article itself is very long) and all the most relevant historical facts should also be in a different section anyway (making it redundant).

• Tuf-Kat 03:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome!

You're welcome. Recently, I've been trying to properly reference articles I encounter. Seeing as weapon dance is properly sourced, I thought I'd add the WP:CITE stuffs in. Anyways, I was going to contact you anyways if you have the ISSN information for the journals you have cited. Cheers. —Jared Hunt August 29, 2006, 15:07 (UTC)

• Oh, I was thinking of putting all of the "references" stuff into "Notes and References" also known as "Footnotes" and getting rid of the old references because it is rather redundant. I don't think there is the "ultimate" manual of style we could follow on this issue, but reading this may be helpful. If you have a suggestion we could agree on, let me know. —Jared Hunt August 30, 2006, 09:51 (UTC)
  • Not that I'm a "meister" at anything, but that's a reported problem occuring since not long ago (two days at most). The bug is filed at bugzilla:7162. —Jared Hunt August 30, 2006, 09:52 (UTC)
    • By the way, you can fix that problem on the fly by clicking edit this page, then replacing "edit" on the URL with purge. Anyways, I'm doing some referencing job on the Weapon dance article currently. We'll see how it looks then when that is done. Usually, some refencing makes everything nice. For example, look at Trevor Graham and Rocketboom I worked on last time. (Don't worry about cluttering up my talk page btw, I think it's rather an honor to be interacting in Wikipedia :D —Jared Hunt August 30, 2006, 10:09 (UTC)
      • (to note) the problem was fixed here, so no worries. But there may be pages in which it never refreshed itself, where you need to either re-edit or do the &action=purge magic. —Jared Hunt August 30, 2006, 23:35 (UTC)

Good work at the new additions, you've mastered the citing magic now! Now, what should we do with the previous references? —Jared Hunt August 31, 2006, 07:02 (UTC)

• I tried fixing the add section problem. I don't know where you added to start with, so I just purged cache again. I fixed the Kurath problem, take a look and let me know if it looks all right. Other problems, let me know too. —Jared Hunt August 31, 2006, 07:25 (UTC)
  • Great! I think I made a mistake last time somehow. Cannot understand why. Human errors I assume. Anyways, I think we should get other editors' opinion on how the references should be dealt with. I think we could fit all of them in the "Notes and References," but we have different opinions. Got to go at the moment. —Jared Hunt August 31, 2006, 10:02 (UTC)
    • You're completely right: There's no consensus. This is clearly evident because today's FA, Atomic line filter, is in the Music of Italy style, while yesterday's FA, Gremlins, is in Weapon dance style. Music of Italy looks like Weapon dance before I participated. I personally prefer the Weapon dance style because it is easier to maintain and one can look at the source directly, without having to look it up again in "Bibiliography" section. —Jared Hunt September 2, 2006, 12:39 (UTC)
      • I think alphabetical is more suitable for print media. Even I would use alphabetical if I were to publish a book, but this is a different matter for the Internet because books don't have the help of hyperlinks. Go ahead on deleting bibliography section. By the way, how about we all try to bring either Music of Italy or Weapon dance to FA status? I can work on references on Music of Italy next. —Jared Hunt September 2, 2006, 12:58 (UTC)
        • Sorry for the late reply. I'm sure TUF-KAT will do a decent job on that article, provided that he's an experienced admin, etc. I won't be working on Music of Italy then. I wish there was a consensus among Wikipedians on which ref system to use however. With all the tools available, they are still not the "standard." Well, good luck with bringing MoI up to FA status, or a Good Article status. Good job with works in Weapon dance by the way. —Jared Hunt September 3, 2006, 15:51 (UTC)

Music of Italy and Weapon dance

Yeah, you're looking in the right place for the peer review (Wikipedia:Peer review/Music of Italy/archive2). Peer review doesn't really get a lot of action these days, but it's still considered best to go through it before FAC (it's always possible we'll get some comments). FAC is the real review though.

I've seen the system used at weapon dance before. I'm not really opposed to it, but I don't generally like it either. I think it tends to work better when there are many references used once or twice, unlike music of Italy, where the references tend to be used many more times. Tuf-Kat 19:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, oops, I could have sworn I'd done that. Yeah, it should have been listed there. I'll fix it. Tuf-Kat 15:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

link to Basque Country

When you want to link to the article about the Basque Country, please do not link to Basque Country, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Basque Country (autonomous community) article, by writing out [[Basque Country (autonomous community)|Basque Country]]. Regards, -- Jeff3000 21:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Ref format

Nice find, pretty much the same discussion, except with a bit more people on a larger scale article. No consensus there either :D. I'm for putting the same references into the same name with <ref name=""/>, because it reduces redundancy. While the number scheme may not work smoothly, I still prefer this format. I'm still not sure on what I think about ref then a separate bibliography though. —Jared Hunt September 7, 2006, 00:57 (UTC)

Castel Nuovo

Thanks for your help! If you're interested in Naples' history, I've recently modified the following articles that needs maybe some copyediting:

• Giovanni Caracciolo
• Joan II of Naples
• Muzio Attendolo

Attilios 16:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Pedro Álvarez de Toledo

Hi Jeffmatt. I posted this on my talk page, but in case you're not watching that, here it is again:

Hi Jeffmatt. Glad I could help. I just sort of stumbled across it, but when I find a picture that way I try to see if it's been added to Wikipedia. I've been working on a similar time period, but on the colonies of New Spain and Peru. I hope a night's sleep got you unsteamed. That usually works for me.

--Rbraunwa 15:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyedit help

Thanks a lot! I think now we can start to live with some history articles. But there's so much to do, still... Ciao and good work! Attilios 19:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey man sorry I don't mean to keep bothering your articles. You know i have my own busy work to do on wikipedia its just I always happen to appear at the right place at the right time!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 09:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Naples landmarks

Ciao! Thanks for your addition of Naples landmarks articles. Good work, but I'd like to claim your attention to: 1) the format, which should follow the Wikipedia rules (see WP:Style), and correctness of infos (for example those in Santa Chiara were mostly wrong. As I've no more Internet connection for some days, if you've time and will you could correct the articles in the path of what, for example, I did in San Lorenzo Maggiore. I also removed ALL the landmarks you added to the template:Naples landmarks as it was intended just to contain the main ones, like Template:Rome Landmarks and others. Otherwise it will fill the bottom of the page with too many links and make it appear clumsy. Bye and good work!!!--Attilios 12:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lombardinapoli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lombardinapoli.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Style of articles

Hi, again Attilios. Your articles about Naples landmarks are really useful. However, they have some part which do not accord to WP:Style rules. 1) The beginning of the article chould be something as "S. Giovanni Maggiore is a church in Naples" etc., and NOT "The church of San Giovanni Maggiore in Naples is located at ..." or so. 2) Categories. Naples' articles I think need only one category, i.e.: "Churches of Naples" or "Buildings and structures in Naples". They are both subcategories of category:Naples, and the former is a subcat of the latter, so don't need to add all them! 3) When you create a REDIRECT article, instead of "see etc." simply add the following: #REDIRECT[[names of article (there's the button #R in the Wikipedia editing menu)

Hope I've been useful. Ciao and good work!! --Attilios 17:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Italian music

I copyedited a printed version of the article, and once I input those changes, I think it'll be ready for FAC. I should be able to do that last half tonight. Tuf-Kat 17:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I kinda figured it'd come... But hell, if Gregorian chant is covered here, then why not ancient Roman music and Etruscan music, but really all that stuff is just as important to Music of France or Music of Greece as it is Italy, so... whatever, I'll continue to have faith that clearer heads will prevail. Tuf-Kat 22:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Filomarino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Filomarino.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

hi

It's not your faullt; my problem is with Raul, the Director of the FAC process. He appears to have no idea of the notion of conflict of interest. This has come up before twice in relation to other nominations, and I don't seem to be able to get through to him on this matter. If he interprets the reviews and comments, and calls a judgement on whether each nomination should pass or fail, he should not be expressing his personal opinions during the review process, simple as that. He has to be seen to be even-handed, as well as actually being even-handed, and to do this he needs to keep a distance. His input should be as "technical" as possible. Tony 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy FAC

Okay, yeah, thanks. I kinda always assume the first FAC will fail just because... well, it just usually does. And lead section are always really hard to write. Tuf-Kat 22:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

I award this Barnstar to Jeffmatt for his ongoing (and excellet) work on Weapon dance and the history of music articles.--Will.i.am 21:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I also saw that you recently went through the [sometimes rather stressful] FAC process lately and commend your courage. Good luck with everything, keep up the good work! --Will.i.am 21:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I know what you mean about FAC. I got dragged along on one and, though I found it a good experience, came away feeling like "eh, maybe not for me". As for the website: WOW, what a website. I'll be in Belgium (German-speaking part) over Christmas, but the Encyclopedia of Naples makes me want to visit there instead! I also saw that you have a degree from University of Hawaii, which is of course where I sent you the barnstar from. How's that for a half circle?--Will.i.am 09:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• We DO still do Friday afternoon beer! And for maximum irony, I'm one of the organizers of TGs!--Will.i.am 22:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Italian diaspora

Thanks for the work on the page about the Italian diaspora. By the way, I see you are living in Naples. Are you Italian-born "Italian," or, like me, a product of the Italian diaspora? Andrew Parodi 07:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the response and the work on the article. Pretty silly of me to ask if you are of Italian descent while your name is Jeff Matthews. (Then again, there was the possibility that it was your mother who was of Italian descent, not your father.) Whatever the caes, thanks for filling out the article.

I've read that it's relatively rare on Wikipedia for someone to start an article as a stub and then have someone else fill it out. I've read that usually when you start a stub you have to carry it through yourself. I've experienced that many times. I'm glad it wasn't true in this case because you did a much better job than I could've done.

Thanks,

Andrew Parodi 03:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

My Italian ancestors, my grandfather actually, come from the Liguria region of Italy, near the Genoa region. I have heard mixed stories, one holding that my grandfather came from a place called Stella and then another that he came from a place called Sanova. I don't know if you're aware of it not, but the issue of Italian ancestry is somewhat touchy for some Italian Americans, in part because of the discrimination we endured during World War Two with the Italian American internment (another stub I started). So, it's always been a little difficult to get my family to open up about the Italian ancestry, even though it's only two generations ago.

About stubs, there's no rule about who fills them in. I've just been told that usually if I am to start a stub it is most likely me who is going to have to complete it. In other words, I've heard it said that usually people have to finish the articles they start because rarely do others chime in with their efforts. Thanks for defying this trend.

I'll take a look at your website.

Thanks,

Andrew Parodi 06:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for being willing to work on that page about the internment. I recently read a book called "Una Storia Segreta" which is all about the internment of Italians in the San Fransisco Bay Area, which is where I was born. I think my grandfather was caught up in this situation to a great degree because he had a complicated story. He was born in the San Francisco area, but when he was a little boy his family returned with him to Italy. Later, when he was 21, he returned to the United States in order to escape Mussolini's draft. Technically speaking, my grandfather was American (that is, a citizen of the United States), but he was raised in Italy and by the time he arrived back in the United States at age 21 he could not speak any English.

I think that my grandfather was most likely very conflicted in all of this. On one hand, he was quite literally a US citizen. But then he couldn't speak English and had been raised in Italy, so in terms of culture and upbringing he was about as Italian as you can get. I only spoke with my grandfather once, and he only saw me once. But my cousin knew him better and told me that he was "just off the boat," in other words, very Italian.

Anyway, my theory is that in my own family's situation my grandfather landed in the US at a point when issues of "Are you one of us (American) or one of the enemy (Italian)?" was very central to his life. I think that this led to my family being touchy about the topic of our Italian ancestry. In fact, the writers of Una Storia Segreta say that this happened to all Italian Americans, and that the Italian American internment basically destroyed the Italian American community. The book says that the message was sent loud and clear that Italians had better assimilate as soon as possible or risk further discrimination.

It was odd for me to discover that Italians have actually endured a type of discrimination in the US. Did you know there was a time when it was questionable as to whether Italians were "white"? [1]

Anyway, sorry to ramble, but this is an important issue for me because I think that this situation was devastating for my family, as well as the entire Italian American community. Andrew Parodi 08:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Yes, there is documented evidence about this. I am not sure about the specifics of it, who exactly was interned, etc., but I know that it happened. My theory is that one reason Japanese American internment has taken precedence in public consciousness is because Italians and Germans (by the way, according to what I've read there were indeed internment sites in the US for Germans as well) can more easily integrate into the society because, after all, we are of European descent. Just change that Italian last name (which has happened for many people), stop talking about Italy, stop speaking Italian, and viola, the Italian connection is erased. With Japanese Americans it's not so easy. With the Asian faces they don't blend in as easily.

Thanks for sort of volunteering to work on the articles. I think a bigger article would be great, but I think I am just too close to the topic to make that article. Thanks.

About the second and third generation issue, that's interesting. Could it be possible, then, that my grandfather would have been considered to still be Italian even though he was born in Italy? In this case, maybe even my own father is considered Italian. Actually, now that you mention it, I remember reading that someone in my father's position (both sides being Italian) could apply for Italian citizenship and would most likely have it granted to him. Interesting. Andrew Parodi 04:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Beneath Naples

Hey jeffmatt, that's a really great article! Did you happen to have any references for it? (Just one or two general ones would be fine). I would love to nominate it for a "Did you know" article, but those articles a) must be less than 5 days old and b) must cite a few references. If you can add one or two in the next few days we can still make it. Cheers!--Will.i.am 11:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

On November 8, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beneath Naples, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hope you're checking out the main page, because your article is on it. Though I noticed it has been moved to the less artistic (though perhaps more descriptive) title of Naples underground geothermal zone. Cheers!--Will.i.am 22:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

It's true, we geologists DO live for those kinds of things. My roommate just said she hoped we have a tsunami soon so we would have experienced earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis. I told her that she was on her own, I classify that as weather, not geology.:-) --Will.i.am 07:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Italy

Would you like to take part to an eventual created WikiProject Italy? You could be responsible for the Neapolitan section... Let me know and good work! (reply on my talk pages so I can knowyour opinion) --Attilios 23:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Here is the temporary page for WikiProject Italy. Kingjeff 17:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Spirenapgenn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spirenapgenn.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Public transport

Thanks for the info about the old metro scheme. The picture is a little dark as it was fairly late in th evening. A truck had broken down, causing the jam. This was World Cup final night so it was an interseting time to be in Naples.--Grahamec 22:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

from Honolulu

That WAS a great article, thanks for sending it! Oddly, I just read The Time Machine last week on a whim so that was a great analogy.--Will.i.am 10:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I gandered, and yet another great article from you! You're rolling them out over there! Oddly enough, there is a category for Campanian volcanic arc, there just wasn't an article. I nominated it for another DYK article - you may have found a new calling.--Will.i.am 06:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Naples and the trombone

Certainly, I'm glad I was able to help. You play, too, eh? Splendid. I've been thinking recently that the trombone article is looking pretty good these days and might even be able to be a good article with a little work. Interested at all? Cheers, Dar-Ape 21:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Fontanelle3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fontanelle3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Battle of San Pietro

I'm sure there is a page of templates somewhere but not sure where. I suggest the easiest thing to do is to copy the code from the edit page of ,say, the Battle of Monte Cassino and edit the content (syntax is pretty self explanatory). If you are nervous about this, copy to a sandbox page and when you've played around with the code it to your satisfaction, then copy it to the San Pietro page. I suggest you include the Italian Campaign box as well. Actually I've included the code for both below - as you can see, if you don't know the information, just leave a blank by the |parameter= entry and it can be picked up later:

Battle of San Pietro Infine
Part of World War II, Italian Campaign
The Liri valley with Mt. Sambùcaro overlooking the modern town of San Pietro Infine (left) and ruins of the original town (center).
Date Dec 8, 1943 – Dec 17, 1943 Location San Pietro Infine, Italy Result Allied victory
Belligerents
United States and others	Germany
Commanders and leaders
	Albert Kesselring

By the way, this is the first substantial entry covering the fighting on the 5th Army front from the Volturno Line to the Gustav Line. Are you planning to cover any of the other engagements?

Stephen Kirrage ^{talk - contribs} 10:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Working on revising the Monte Cassino box to fit San Pietro Infine. Need info on casualties, commanders, etc. In progress. Jeffmatt 16:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your post on my talk page. That's the great thing about this project...you only do what you really want to do! Happy New Year to you too! Stephen Kirrage ^{talk - contribs} 22:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

I am adding this incomplete war box to the article and shall work on filling in accurate casualties as well as other combatants. Jeffmatt 06:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

{{Helpme}}

I'm trying to find the master template for the Campaignbox Italy (directly on the right). It doesn't seem to be at Template:Infobox_Military_Conflict or anywhere on the [2] list of all templates. I am probably searching wromg. Sorry. Jeffmatt 12:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the Campaignbox Italy template, it is just an invocation of the Campaign template. I assume that is the one you are looking for? If that is the case, just copy what Campaignbox Italy does into a new template, specific to your current campaign, and then include that in the articles themselves. -- Sir Escher ^talk 12:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:DantesquareNaples.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DantesquareNaples.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Music of Italy

I'd really like to get it re-FACed, the only major problem being the two cite needed tags at the end of the venues section. Would you happen to have a source for those? Tuf-Kat 03:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

OK. Working on it. Jeffmatt 10:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

whee

How do I input Chinese characters into text? Jeffmatt 09:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Start -> All Programs -> Accessories -> System Tools -> Character Map {Slash-|-Talk} 21:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

It's all UTF-8. All the characters are mapped to different symbols; let me reinstate that helpme template. {Slash-|-Talk} 18:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem. {Slash-|-Talk} 16:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Massran.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Massran.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mariomerola.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariomerola.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:RAIaud2.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:RAIaud2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Pinoccio01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinoccio01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pinoccio01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinoccio01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Santa Restituta

Hello I noticed you created the article Santa Restituta about a church in Napoli.. I recently created an article Restituta (who it is named after) using sources from the internet. I was just wondering if you could look over them both, as Restituta was from Africa (like the girl mentioned in your article) but I've never read anything about a girl and a burning boat in any references. Many thanks. - The Immaculate 09:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of Naples

I saw that you contributed much to the articles related to Naples, you may be interested in joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of Naples, which coveres the historic country from 1285 until 1816 and also Two Sicilies, from 1816 until 1861. It would be great if you could contribute to the project! - Animagentile (talk) 17:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scugnizad1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scugnizad1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sanremofest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sanremofest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Canznap01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Canznap01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pietrarsanap.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Pietrarsanap.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Nicolas Isouard

Hi. Minor point but can you give a source for the name change? I've put a note about this on the Talk Page. Cheers. --Kleinzach (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. My Italian is not great, but I did realize the spelling was unusual, however we normally defer to Grove as an expert source unless we have a good reason to think there is a mistake. In this case Oxford also gives Nicolò. Must be great to live in Naples. I'm in the far north - still surrounded by snow! Best. --Kleinzach (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Music of Italy

I assume you're watching the talk page, but in case you aren't, my take (posted there) is that Italian music works much better as a title, and allows you to go back into history without having to worry about antiquity. But I'm happy to let the Music projects make the call. FlagSteward (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of songs that employ counterpoint

I have nominated List of songs that employ counterpoint, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that employ counterpoint. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

All Wikipedia images have stopped loading in my SeaMonkey browser (I've just downloaded the latest version and that didn't help. They didn't load in the previous version and now don't load in the new one. However, images all load correctly if I use IE or Firefox. I guess it's a SeaMonkey problem, but I'm not sure. Any ideas? Thank you very much for your time and help. Jeffmatt (talk) 06:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure about SeaMonkey, but you can try to refresh the cache (Ctrl + F5, i think), see if can work. --Aleenf1 08:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm not solve the problem, but I'm glad finally all works for you. Bravo. Any help, you can still ask me. :) --Aleenf1 16:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Berlin1a.PNG}

Thank you for uploading Image:Berlin1a.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Berlin2.PNG}

Thank you for uploading Image:Berlin2.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Napoli

Hi! It is extraordinary what you have done with Naples. Congratulations, nice job! I put together the Hungarian version of it, which is featured article there. My problem is, that there are no pictures for many of the buildings from the city. I wonder if you could help, because as I understood you live there. Naples is one of my favourite cities from Europe, I am planning to visit it again perhaps in april! Congratulations again! Best regards --Istvánka (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Palaces from Naples

Hi,

this is a list of palaces without photos on commons. Could you take same pictures in your sparetime?

Palazzo Tufarelli - Via Benedetto Croce 23.

Palazzo Carafa della Spina - Via Benedetto Croce 45.

Palazzo Petrucci - Piazza San Domenico 3.

Palazzo Corigliano - Piazza San Domenico 12.

Piazza San Gaetano

Palazzo Spinelli di Laurino - Via Tribunali 362.

Palazzo Paradisiello - Viale del Parco Margherita 36.

Palazzo Carafa di Belvedere - Riviera di Chiaia 202.

Palazzo Castriota - Via Santa Maria di Constantinopoli

Palazzo della Regina Giovanna - Vico Santa Maria Vertecoeli 9.

Palazzo Calabritto - Via Calabritto 30.

Palazzo Caraciollo di Avellino - Largo Avellino

Palazzo Majo - Via Santa Teresa

There are some churches without pictures. I will get back later with a list with them.

Many thanks --Istvánka (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

These churches have no photos on commons:

San Giovanni Maggiore - Vico Santa Maria dell Aiuto 10.

Santa Maria delle Neve - Piazza Vincenzio Aprea

Santa Maria della Concordia - Piazetta Concordia

Oratorio della Confraternita dei Bianchi - Vico Bianchi allo Spirito Santo 3.

Santa Maria della Misericordia - Via Tribunali 253.

Santa Maria di Gerusalemme - Via Pisanelli 8.

Complesso monastico di Suor Orsola Benincasa - Via Suor Orsola 204.

San Nicola de Tolentino - Corso Vittorio Emanuele 204.

Santa Maria dei Miracoli - Via Foria

Sant’Eframo Vecchio - Piazetta Sant’Eframo Vecchio

San Benedetto - Via Arco Mirelli 27.

Santa Maria dei Pazzi - Via Salvator Rosa 288.

Santa Maria Antesaecula - Vico Cangiano alla Sanita 49.

Ancelle del Sacro Cuore - Largo Caterina Volpialle

Santa Maria delle Fede - PIazza Santa Maria delle Fede

That’s all! In case you have time! Many thanks--Istvánka (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Adelaide Anne Procter

I noticed that you left a thank you on the article's talk page, and I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to do that. It was very nice of you. Best, Ricardiana (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Transistion (journal)

A tag has been placed on Transistion (journal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 12:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jeffmatt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Marco Tutino - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Massimo Ranieri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Gianni Morandi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Danilo Rea - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Enzo Pietropaoli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Francesco Nastro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Gabriele Mirabassi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Stefano Battaglia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pompmusic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pompmusic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Filomarino.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Filomarino.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Venicemusic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Venicemusic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ThSiebs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ThSiebs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Mergellina.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Mergellina.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jeffmatt. You have new messages at WP:Help desk.
Message added 09:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File permission problem with File:Piscina mirabilis3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Piscina mirabilis3.jpg, which you've sourced to Fulvio Salvi. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bagnolipier.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Baynap02.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:54, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Camaldonap.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Carducciclitunno.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Capuanogate.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Carminenap.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Cassanostairs.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Centrodirpan.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cavrust.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cavrust.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:JeannetteThurber.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Folkaccord.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Folkaccord.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Folkflutes.jpg
• File:Fontanelle3.jpg
• File:Naplesunderground.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeffmatt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jeffmatt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jeffmatt/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffmatt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Garzya has been accepted

Antonio Garzya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:AntGarzya.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:AntGarzya.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Frontal facial and shoulder shot of Antonio Garzya.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Frontal facial and shoulder shot of Antonio Garzya.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AntGarzya facial color shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AntGarzya facial color shot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jeffmatt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luigi Cinque Tarantula Hypertext Orchestra

The article Luigi Cinque Tarantula Hypertext Orchestra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Broc (talk) 17:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Weapon dance

Weapon dance has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)