User talk:Jpbowen/Archive 10

Speedy deletion nomination of Summer School Marktoberdorf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Summer School Marktoberdorf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 22:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I have added notability information with references. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schlosshöfe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schlossplatz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Corrected, thank you.. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weser-Ems Halle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conference. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Corrected, thank you.. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DNA Model Crick-Watson.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DNA Model Crick-Watson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dorset geology.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dorset geology.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dracula1st.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Dracula1st.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FitzwilliamMuseum.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FitzwilliamMuseum.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Glyptothek Munich.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Glyptothek Munich.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Glyptothek in München.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Glyptothek in München.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The image is neither corrupt nor empty — see WP:CSD#F2. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Henley on Thames-Along the Thames.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Henley on Thames-Along the Thames.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Shaw (stone carver), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln, Stamford and Arncliffe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

All corrected thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Demographic history of Jerusalem page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you to User:Jonesey95 for correcting this. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Issaf Nashashibi Center for Culture and Literature

added links pointing to Gaza, Palestinian and Ottoman

Conrad Schick Library

added a link pointing to Palestine

Fundamental Agreement Between the Holy See and the State of Israel

added a link pointing to Vatican

Khalidi Library

added a link pointing to Ottoman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Parnas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• approach towards ranking academic production. On his November 2007 paper ''Stop the Numbers Game]'',<ref>[http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1297797.1297815 Stop the Numbers Game], [[ACM]].</ref> he

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Done. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ien Lucas

added a link pointing to Limburg

Jerusalem The Emanation of the Giant Albion

added a link pointing to Britain

Sudarshan Shetty

added a link pointing to Tilton

The Stone of Losses

added a link pointing to Jewish poetry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Done, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HaYarkon 96, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penthouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Radcliffe.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:John Radcliffe.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Constable 026.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:John Constable 026.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Constable 006.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:John Constable 006.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Folk museums

Category:Folk museums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 03:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!

	Thank you!
	Thank you for your work on the museum informatics page, and for your contirbutions to Museums and the Web! I am currently a Museum Studies graduate student, and am doing some self-directed study of the extraordinary role museums are poised to play in the 21st century. Thank you for the information! Histeme (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maronite Catholic Archeparchy of Haifa and the Holy Land, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Milton's Walk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Milton's Walk. Since you had some involvement with the Milton's Walk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Short Road, Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Short Road, Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the Short Road, Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

University of Hertfordshire Press listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect University of Hertfordshire Press. Since you had some involvement with the University of Hertfordshire Press redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LaMona (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Local road listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Local road. Since you had some involvement with the Local road redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Wheare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Wheare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Wheare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collections Management System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galleries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Colt Clavier Collection

added a link pointing to Clementi

Southam's Cardall Collection

added a link pointing to Artefact

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dasha Zhukova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorky Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albert Einstein Archives

added links pointing to Palestine and Princeton

Albert Einstein Square (Jerusalem)

added a link pointing to Palestine

Lonsdale Road

added a link pointing to Preparatory school

Science Oxford

added a link pointing to Martin Wood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Casio EX-S20 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio EX-S20 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio EX-S20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Casio EX-S20

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Casio EX-S20 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 04:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hermann Georg Fiedler

added a link pointing to Queen Margaret College

John Sealy Townsend

added a link pointing to Clerk Maxwell

Sue Black (computer scientist)

added a link pointing to BCS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Brummels Gallery refnotice Comment

Hi Jonathon, Thank you for your checking of Brummels Gallery. It's an article that has required considerable labour due to scant material available, particularly on its early history, despite the recognised importance of the gallery to Australian photography. I've attended to the two citation request insertions...a link to Google maps where a Streetview image of the facade showing the signage is available. Also linked to the Rennie Ellis site from where the information in the seventy exhibitions is derived (repeated in promo material for the retrospective exhibition at MGA). It is a quite thoroughly references article now I believe. Might I ask you please now to remove the request for citations template from the top of the article? Thanks again for your work on WP, James. sinarau (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You are welcome and can also remove the "more refs" request yourself if you have addressed the issues. A photo would be a good addition if you have one. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Resort spas listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Resort spas. Since you had some involvement with the Resort spas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eric Gill

added a link pointing to Michael Sadler

Rockefeller Museum

added a link pointing to British Mandate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Updated. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benjamin Z. Kedar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Updated. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Punctuation in image captions

This is a very, very minor thing, but per WP:CAPFRAG, image captions should only end in a period if they are complete sentences. Ibadibam (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Noted, thank you! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Shaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spinning. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Updated. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Healthcare in Cambridgeshire

I don't think we need citations for facts which are supported by other articles in the encyclopedia.Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Where does it say this in the Wikipedia guidelines, I have not seen it, or is it a personal opinion? Please give the reference, thank you! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

It seems pretty obvious to me. We have well established articles about Regional Health Authorities and the like which shows which districts were the responsibility of each, over time. Its quite a complicated story, and referenced to statutory instruments. Why would we want to rewrite all this in every local area? There is nothing controversial about it, but it can be confusing. In the same way, when we refer, for example, to Bedford, we don't need to provide a reference to show that Bedford exists.Rathfelder (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Sadly what is "pretty obvious" to one person is not pretty obvious to all. That is why there are rules and guidelines. Otherwise we would just have anarchy if we all just follow our own views. See especially Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source in this case:

If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or middlepage in this case).

I.e., don't relie on other Wikipedia pages for verifiability. So you can add the references from the pages where you think there is already a suitable reference. And add more if you think it appropriate too. For further information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles and for general guidelines, see WP:VERIFY. I hope this helps. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I don't think your interpretation is in line with practice. If you inspect today's featured article 70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) - held up as an example of good work - it is full of references to other Wikipedia articles. See Wikipedia:When to cite. The existence of Health authorities is an example of Subject-specific common knowledge. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but not the "facts" about them. 70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) has 186 citations, Healthcare in Cambridgeshire has three and a notice that additional citations are needed. Since I assume you are knowledgeable in this area, you could add suitable citations. On Wikipedia, other articles are not referenced in the list of references, they are linked with internal hyperlinks. I hope this helps and happy Wikipedia editing. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Curate's egg

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

History of Oxfordshire

added a link pointing to Midlands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

RfC: Georgiy Starostin

Hi. Since you are a member of WP:SYSTEMS, could you please weigh in at this RfC regarding a BLP article on Georgiy Starostin? Dan56 (talk) 07:03, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Not really my area, good luck. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Open Data Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Startup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Journal of Creative Computing

The article International Journal of Creative Computing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. (As an aside: I cannot find any other issue apart from the inaugural issue published in 2013).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

I believe the notability of authors of papers in this journal with the own existing Wikipedia entries illustrates that this is a notable subject and certainly the leading journal in the area of creative computing. I have added more information and references including notable authors, I believe meeting criterion 1 of WP:JOURNALCRIT through these authors. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of International Journal of Creative Computing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Journal of Creative Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Creative Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 14:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Harrow Museum

added a link pointing to John Stratford

International Journal of Creative Computing

added a link pointing to JISC

St. Mary's, Harrow on the Hill

added a link pointing to Harrow Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposal to rename categories

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Defunct villages by country and subcategories to Category:Former villages by country etc. Hugo999 (talk) 18:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Percy Robertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Philip. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

"Creativity journals"

Hi, I'm not really sure how to interpret this cat. Are there any journals that don't involve creativity? I mean, Einstein was a physicist and his physics work required an enormous amount of creativity. I think Stephen Hawking is incredibly creative. Engineers also have to be creative. Every computer programmer has to be creative, not just those who publish in the International Journal of Creative Computing. You have added "Arts journals" to this cat, but not "Culture journals" or "Philosophy journals". Are culture ad philosophy not creative? In fact, researchers in any field have to be creative, so I actually don't see how this category is different from the "Academic journals" cat... Can you perhaps clarify how this cat is to be interpreted (if possible with a source)? Also, I don't think that this cat, however it is going to be defined, belongs in the "multidisciplinary academic journals" cat. The one redirect currently directly in the cat is a computer programming journal and not multidisciplinary. Neither are most of the journals in the "Arts journals" cat and its subcats. Yes, the cat as it currently stands contains journals from many disparate categories, but the journals themselves are in large majority not multidisciplinary. --Randykitty (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

I was thinking of journals about creativity at the meta-level. If you don't think arts journals fit, you can delete of course. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Done. However, that leaves just one redirect (a journal on using computer methods in creative endeavors, not really about creativity either) and one subcat (with only 2 entries), that doesn't really need this mothercat, I'd say. --Randykitty (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Personally I think arts journal include papers that are about creativity of artistic works at the meta-level, whereas in other disciplines, the papers themselves are the creative output. Do you disagree? There are more entries in this category now anyway. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ann Thetis Blacker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Oswald. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum of Geology, Tashkent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turing Institute, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shell and Burroughs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Evans (computer scientist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:People from Gwynedd]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Convocations of Canterbury and York article

I believe you added the lacking inline citations banner on Feb 2010. Actually, the whole article was copied verbatim without citation from the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) as linked in article https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Convocation_of_the_English_Clergy. I don’t have a clue about what needs to be done. Vejlefjord (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I did a bit of further editing. I hope this helps. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Danger is here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:745A:6477:A2BC:A7BF (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmanuel Shearith Israel Chapel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Updated, thank you. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taubman Museum of Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Hart Benton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Updated, thank you. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum Mile, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Updated, thank you. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Place of birth missing – why?

Good time of the day,

First, let me duly apologize about the quality of my English. I am doing the best I can.

In September 2015 you added the Category: Place of birth missing to the article about Manfred Broy. This article states that Manfred Broy was born in Landsberg am Lech, a district capital in Southern Germany. I knew Manfred Broy many years ago when we both worked for TUM, and I have no reason to doubt that information. So for what reason did you put him into that category? Does Wikipedia require more precise information?

(If you want to reply then, of course, do it here, as you write in your preamble.)

Best regards, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

This means that a category for the place of birth is missing, not that it is not in the article. So I have added Category:People from Landsberg am Lech in this case. Thank you for alerting me. – Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shanghai Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Century Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Maltster listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maltster. Since you had some involvement with the Maltster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 08:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of IGI Global for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IGI Global is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGI Global (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 06:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Castellers of London

added a link pointing to Catalan

St. Thomas' Peace Garden

added a link pointing to West Midlands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cecil Stephenson

added a link pointing to Constructivist

IGI Global

added a link pointing to ACM

St Ives School

added a link pointing to Constructivist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

I am alerting editors

that I think (or is it a feeling?) might be interested in the discussion going on here. Category talk:Sculptures by artist. Stop by and see what you . . . . well . . .... think or feel. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

IGI Global listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IGI Global. Since you had some involvement with the IGI Global redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. agtx 17:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Palladian Press

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Palladian Press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Safety-Critical Systems Club

The article Safety-Critical Systems Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. A Google search yielded very little in the form of independent reliable source coverage. The only cited source is affiliated. Please add citations to in depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources or this article may be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Safety-Critical Systems Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Safety-Critical Systems Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://scsc.org.uk/?opt=about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)^[1] 05:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Should be saved. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

London Fire Brigade Museum

Hi,

I'm pretty new to Wikipedia and was recently updating the London Fire Brigade Museum page which you created. Unfortunately the museum is now closed until it moves to new premises so I've added info to that effect (along with a pic and some web references). I'm never quite sure if I'm going about things the right way though (infoboxes, web links vs references etc...) so if you don't think it looks right I'd appreciate any feedback.

Thanks! Loweredtone (talk) 13:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

I have done some editing. Avoidance of bare links and more footnotes would be good. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Puzzled

I am puzzled. IGI Global is predominantly a vanity press, and the article was deleted by consensus. You appear to be spending a considerable amount of effort creating directory entries on its journals, and trying to re-establish the article on the company. I'd be interested in understanding why, if you'd care to share that. Guy (Help!) 23:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

IGI Global is not a "vanity press" by the definition on Wikipedia. Even if it was, it is not a criterion for deletion on Wikipedia. It is an academic press widely subscribed by universities internationally with 170+ journals, even if it is not top-rated and has rather expensive publications. I understand that your opinion differs but it is just an opinion, best avoided on Wikipedia and in encyclopedias in general (IMHO!). — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Journal of Global Information Management for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Global Information Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Global Information Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)