User talk:Jumpy542

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hudepohl Brewing Company, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 17:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Goodwill Industries have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Goodwill Industries was changed by Jumpy542 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892983 on 2022-01-23T03:30:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Benjamin112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021–22 NFL playoffs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Benjamin112 ☎ 16:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Take Me Home, Country Roads. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monday's Broncos-Seahawks game needs its own Wikipedia page. Jumpy542 (talk) 02:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Template:Buffalo Bills. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The butt fumble has its own article, why doesn't the butt punt? Jumpy542 (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Let's Go Blue—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dartez Jacobs (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one source added since previous decline, it is from a foundation website, not a reliable source like a newspaper.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dartez Jacobs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jumpy542! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panorama Middle School (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panorama Middle School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Pudding[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Royal Pudding, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited or poorly cited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation. A Twitter account belonging to an unknown individual that does not mention the information in question is not a reliable source.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of NFL nicknames, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wide Right II (Buffalo Bills) (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still does not appear to pass WP:NSPORTSEVENT. The information in this draft would be best merged to a section of Bills–Chiefs rivalry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wide Right II (Buffalo Bills) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]