User talk:KnowledgeGoddessDC

U up podcast moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, U up podcast, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to offer you a bit more detail on why I draftified this new article. At present, it doesn't appear to contain enough independent secondary sources to establish notability. The first two sources were links to the podcast itself - these are primary sources; the Broadway World article appears to be a routine announcement of an event, presumably a rehashed press release, and so not independent; and the New York Comedy Festival link is an advert, so again, not independent - none of these contribute towards notability per WP:GNG. The Chicago Tribune article is possibly better - I can't assess the quality of the source (I'm in the UK so the content is blocked), but at least it's an independent source. We need multiple such sources to establish notability however. I've looked for more reliable sources online and I didn't find any, but rather than nominate for deletion I've draftified it in the hope that you might be able to find more sources and improve it. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you would like me to take a look at any sources you find about the podcast. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 16:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I don't want to submit my draft for approval unless it feels like it's significant;y better than it was after my first attempt. I have 4 new third party sources (Seattle Times and Elite Daily among others). From your point of view, does this look like a fully built out page? Or should I keep digging up other news sources that talk about the U Up podcast and the live shows this fall? Thanks for your help and expertise! KnowledgeGoddessDC (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi [User:Girth Summit] -- I wanted to call out the 3 best sources here that I think indicate this is a notable podcast worth having its own wiki page. As the fanbase grows, I'm sure there will be more press, but for now, these three sources are reputable and support notability. They are as follows: 1. The Washington Post - 5 Dating App Mistakes You're Probably Making According to the Hosts of U Up (https://www.washingtonpost.com/express/2019/01/24/dating-app-mistakes-youre-probably-making-according-folks-behind-u-up/) 2. Chicago Tribune - The ‘U Up?’ podcast duo is coming to Chicago — with no-nonsense advice for dating in the city (https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-life-betches-dating-show-chicago-20190812-5ey5x2jec5gxdgrxen3ayrkjwu-story.html) 3. E Online - "Listen Up, Gigi Hadid: This Is What Tyler Cameron Is Looking For in a Partner"(https://www.eonline.com/news/1068644/listen-up-gigi-hadid-this-is-what-tyler-cameron-is-looking-for-in-a-partner)

KnowledgeGoddessDC (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, KnowledgeGoddessDC, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GirthSummit _(blether) 19:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

I realised that nobody had welcomed you properly. The above template is a bit impersonal, but the links are pretty useful and should help you get started. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 19:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U Up? (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still has a bunch of advertising verbiage and needs to be redescribed neutrally. Also explain when and how the live show format began, and are they using that going forward or doing most of the current podcasts in studio?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:U Up? and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:U Up?, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KnowledgeGoddessDC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback -- these feel like achievable changes I can make with a little bit more research and re-writing the live show portion. I'll get on that this week and see if it's starting to shape up. Thank you!! KnowledgeGoddessDC (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:U Up? concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:U Up?, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:U Up?[edit]

Hello, KnowledgeGoddessDC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "U Up?".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]