User talk:LadyLirazel
Welcome[edit]
|
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 08:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi LadyLirazel[edit]
Hi LadyLirazel. You might want to have a quick read of WP:SIGNATURE. The signature (four tildes) should be placed at the end of the post, not at the beginning. Happy editing. Bus stop (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:LadyLirazel[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:LadyLirazel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
User page[edit]
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:
- an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
- a workspace for a draft article
- a personal website, blog, or social media site
- a space for self-promotion or other advertising
- a CV/resumé
- a lengthy autobiography
The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020[edit]
Hi LadyLirazel! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Stefan Molyneux that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- --LadyLirazel (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Sorry, that was accidental on my part, as I thought it was my staging area.
Stefan Molyneux/Podcasts moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Stefan Molyneux/Podcasts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 12:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- --LadyLirazel (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC) It is clear that you and others here don't want evidence contrary to the very slanderous allegations of "white supremacist" or "scientific racist". The Podcast list is a very comprehensive list of neary all of Stefan's production, and I would challenge anyone to find anything where he supports "white supremacy". If anything, he denounces supremacy many, many, many times.
- No one here has the slightest interests in the facts, the evidence, any of it. You are only interested in what yellow journalists that kowtow to your echo chamber claims. And one of you have already made it clear that the facts do not matter to you.
- Wikipedia used to be respectable in the past, and I had actually defended Wikipedia despite the fact that "anyone can edit it". Now, it is clear that I am wasting my time here trying to convince any of you of the truth about Stefan. No amount of evidence will convince you. You'll just keep deleting my edits, even my staged edits on my own user page.
- Stay in your echo chambers. What was that song by Pink Floyd? The Fletcher Memorial Home. A song written about more serious times, but it applies. It applies.
- Your article was moved to drafts because it does not follow Wikipedias policies on style, naming conventions and likely does not meet the notability standard for standalone lists. You are more than welcome to submit the draft for review and if not accepted you will receive constructive feedback on where improvement is needed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- It was not an article in and of itself. It was supposed to be included by a macro for another page. And I was not done with it. Well, whatever the excuses, it is clear you are wanting to prevent me from updating Stefan M's page under the guise of "Wikipedia's style", etc. And this is the 3rd or 4th time it was deleted. I am done here. And you can be happy you and the others defeated me.
- Well your work is not deleted but rather moved to a namespace where you could work on it without threat of deletion but whatever. Have a nice day and best of luck in your endeavors. GPL93 (talk) 21:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you move it to a different place, how is the macro supposed to work? And like I said, the other administrators flat-out deleted it, even when I had it in my own sandbox! Whatever.
- The macro will NOT work with the page in user space, that's the point of moving it. The page was moved to user space because A) it is not encyclopedic and B) this gives you a chance to work on it if you feel it can be made encyclopedic.
- It is not encyclopedic because Wikipedia is not a program guide. A list of the various locations of Molyneux's postings is simply not part of summarizing what independent reliable sources say about Molyneux (which is what Wikipedia is for).
- The page you created, which fails Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, has three possible destinations. Had it been me, I would have deleted it as I do not foresee a time when you will be able to find independent reliable sources discussing in a substantive way the sites you have listed in this context. The second option would have been to move it to "Draft" space, giving you and other editors a few months to work on it, establish that it should be moved back or have it deleted. The third option, moving it to user space essentially means you are the only one working on it (which, honestly, is true anyway) but removes the relatively short deadline before it would be deleted.
- Frankly, I think it's a lost cause either way as the material is simply not part of what Wikipedia does. You can do a few different things.
- 1) Give up. The material will sit here and be forgotten unless someone wants to go through the bother of deleting it.
- 2) Try to add it to the article anyway. It will be removed. Heck, you can assume *I* will remove it and skip right to #3.
- 3) Take the issue to the talk page. You will be asked how this list meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. (Hint: I don't think it does.)
- 4) Start a request for comments and see where it goes. (I don't see that working, but I could be wrong.)
- 5) Work to change Wikipedia's policies so that we do include extensive lists of locations of podcasts, cities visited by politicians, book stores where authors have had signings, etc. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you move it to a different place, how is the macro supposed to work? And like I said, the other administrators flat-out deleted it, even when I had it in my own sandbox! Whatever.
- Well your work is not deleted but rather moved to a namespace where you could work on it without threat of deletion but whatever. Have a nice day and best of luck in your endeavors. GPL93 (talk) 21:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- It was not an article in and of itself. It was supposed to be included by a macro for another page. And I was not done with it. Well, whatever the excuses, it is clear you are wanting to prevent me from updating Stefan M's page under the guise of "Wikipedia's style", etc. And this is the 3rd or 4th time it was deleted. I am done here. And you can be happy you and the others defeated me.
- Your article was moved to drafts because it does not follow Wikipedias policies on style, naming conventions and likely does not meet the notability standard for standalone lists. You are more than welcome to submit the draft for review and if not accepted you will receive constructive feedback on where improvement is needed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Stefan Molyneux/Podcasts[edit]
Hello, LadyLirazel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stefan Molyneux/Podcasts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)