User talk:Lauraself

Hollyoaks[edit]

Please DO NOT add Dom into the upcoming and returning section. As I've explained in the edit summary and even added a comment onto the page, Hollyoaks Later characters aren't included in this section. Continue to go against these rules and it may be considered as disruptive editing and you may be banned. ThisIsDanny (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Raintheone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dominic Reilly because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rain the 1 22:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

From now on, if you'd like to edit something, please request it in the talk page. There's been a number of issues with you where you've tried to edit a page but you've broken the page. Please use your sandbox to practise edits first or at least show a preview of your edit to see what it looks like before saving the page. If you can't do it yourself, please request someone else do it. ThisIsDanny (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You may think it is clever - but we can clearly see that you logged out and edited under your IP address which is 2.26.49.37 Rain the 1 19:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 10:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't you banned yet?[edit]

I seriously don't know how you haven't been banned yet. Every edit you make seems to be pointless, disruptive or just generally breaking the pages by you "attempting" to edit tables etc. It just seems like I have to revert every edit you do which can get a little bit irritating. If you actually have something to contribute then request on talk pages, that would probably be less annoying for other editors. ThisIsDanny (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If they continue - report them at WP:RVAN.Rain the 1 17:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ThisIsDanny (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Hollyoaks characters (2008) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|classification= [[List of past Hollyoaks characters#last appeared in 2008| Former; regular

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (2008). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Rain the 1 19:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. What do you think you are doing? Listing all those recurring characters in lists as regulars. You are ruining this project with your original research edits. I have no doubt you are a sock puppet either so I will not waste my time with advice - you have ignored all warnings so far. Stop it.Rain the 1 19:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

You keep adding 7 November and a source to Will Savage's departure. First of all you can't source properly which makes it difficult for all the other users to understand what you're even attempting to do, secondly, if you read the source it doesn't say 7 November so what you're doing is pointless and irrelevant and I'm confused as to why you STILL haven't been blocked. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Your 50+ edits today on List of Hollyoaks characters don't have edit summaries. While we can just assume they're vandalism, it would be helpful if you added a summary. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE use the Preview feature of the Wikipedia editing screen[edit]

Please use the Preview feature of the Wikipedia editing screen to ensure that your edits do not introduce big red error messages or obvious formatting problems.

To use the Preview feature, click Edit in the usual way, make your edits, and then instead of clicking Save Page, click Preview. Then take a look at the page as it will appear. If there is stray text, a misplaced table cell, or a big red error message, continue editing instead of clicking Save Page. Click Preview again. If the Preview looks right, only then should you click Save Page.

Learning to do this will save other editors trouble. The edits you are making to List of Hollyoaks characters are causing the article to appear in error-tracking categories that many editors watch in order to keep Wikipedia looking nice. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Hollyoaks characters (2013) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

her in the psychiatric unit Sonny promises to help her prove that she did not kill her daughter. [[Sonny Valentine}] goes to the hospital & asks [[Lindsey Butterflied]] if she did check the tot'
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nico Blake (Hollyoaks)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nico Blake (Hollyoaks) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epicgenius (talk) 19:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Myra McQueen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|classification = [[List of past Hollyoaks characters#Last appeared in 2014|Former; regular]](returning]]
scoop/a324190/hollyoaks-qa-myra-on-the-mcqueens-and-more.html|work=[[Digital Spy]]|publisher=([[Hachette Filipacchi UK]]|date=10 June 2011|accessdate=21 July 2012}}</ref> On Myra's parenting

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amber Sharpe may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|[[daughter= [[Bella Sharpe]]
dad Phil about her mum's relationship with Tony."<ref name="holysoap">{{cite web|title=Holy Soap > Hollyoaks > Cast > Amber Sharpe|url=http://holysoap.five.tv/hollyoaks/cast/amber-sharpe-9548|work=[[Channel 5 (UK)|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bella Sharpe[edit]

Hello Lauraself,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bella Sharpe for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulaimandaud (talk) 10:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This character is clearly not worth an individual article, which is why one editor tagged it for speedy deletion and I changed it to a redirect. Please do not change it back into an article again.TheLongTone (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

I've taken a look at your editing after your April block by JamesBWatson, and it doesn't look any less disruptive to me. You still simply push your own changes without ever engaging in discussion, and they're often not good changes. The reverts and edits at Bella Sharpe are one example. There is literally no edit by you to any talkpage, which is the opposite of collaborative editing, especially when people try to talk with you here on your own page. Nor a single edit summary. You have been blocked for a month. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 14:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to James Buckley (actor). Thank you. January (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at High-Rise (film). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for disruptive editing. I have blocked your IP too. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Restrain[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Restrain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ^Discuss? 00:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alter ego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Identity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosie Winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Ramsey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rosie Winter[edit]

The article Rosie Winter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. John of Reading (talk) 13:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than just deleting the deletion notice, please read the text of the deletion notice and the message here. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosie Winter[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosie Winter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 14:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Rosie Winter. And BLP PROD templates.I have no doubt you're also IP 2.26.61.186. Drmies (talk) 15:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bishonen, I gave the above warning after this revert. After this one, I see no reason why they shouldn't be blocked indefinitely: this editor is not worth the trouble. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And this all happened during the past couple of days, soon after the previous 3-month block expired. I see. OK, I agree. I have also blocked the associated IP for three months. Thanks for the ping, Drmies. Bishonen | talk 15:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC).[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:File.58eeb7ab3ec14a27cf38ba6e9df52aac 400x400.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:File.58eeb7ab3ec14a27cf38ba6e9df52aac 400x400.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing without apparently learning anything from the previous blocks. You have only been editing for a couple of days after the previous 3-month block expired, and you have already been removing deletion tags over and over again (ignoring warnings about it), without giving any reason. I'm sorry, it'll have to be an indefinite block this time. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 15:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cloudz679 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any tests in the future. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lauraself/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C 679 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lauraself, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C 679 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]